[VP]

I did some research years ago on this person and found that a neighbor of the Stines and Ramsey's last name was Lake. Also, a Bill Lake was in the movie about JonBenet's murder.

Anyway, here are some posts by Lake (broken up for expediency of posting), from the old Justice Watch forum. Hints as to who this might be can be found in the mispelled words. I'd say typos except for the fact that he mispells them over and over again.

Unbelieveably
seperately
neice
judgement
cooberated
publically
coverup
warrent

I doubt seriously this is Ohlshaker.

________________________________
[font=Arial Narrow][size=1]"More MW"
Posted by lake on 17:34:01 5/31/2000

The claims of the woman from Ca. is the closest thing to date that makes
the loose ends of this case tie together. Now this woman has a brother and
a sister that are are alive and well. Her sister is two years younger than
she, and her brother is 4 years younger than she. It seems to me that her
stories of abuse and the long time connection to the White family could be
cooberated by her siblings if they were willing to talk. But quite often,
siblings do not come forward when this type of abuse and criminal activity is
involved.
But the kicker to me is the long time association with the White family if
there is no biological connection between the two families. Especially since
the mother of the MW confirms that she and a MW neice have been in the
company of the Whites in Boulder Co. in 1996. Of course the mother says it
was a Haloween party in 1996 and not the Christmas party that MW says
the mother told her of. But is one to believe a long time abuser of children
or a former child that was abused?


[ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]

_________________________
6. "Not likely, SD"
Posted by lake on 22:24:55 5/31/2000

But since SLK(R) is a government employee, I think the Feds are might be
able to put some extra pressure on that one. The case may be about to to
turn the corner and ST is going to be run over again. This guy can't can't
stay on his feet.
Poor Steve. He is going to be run over but good this time.
[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. "Well"
Posted by lake on 22:38:25 5/31/2000

Most of you could be run over by the truth of this case and would not know
what hit you. Just like little Stevie. If he were not such a moron one might
feel sorry for him.
[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
_________________________________
21. "fly"
Posted by lake on 16:04:30 6/01/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 16:04:30, 6/01/2000

I try and give you the benefit of the doubt, but sometime your thinking is
soo skewed. Fleet White wrote public letters pretending to be defending the
good name of Boulder from the mess he claimed Hunter was making of the
Ramsey case. And he cannot find it in him to write one public letter
defending the good name of HIS family? Demanding that the BPD "clear" his
family from the claims of NJK? Give me a break, fly. And god knows it is a
huge family. If you open your eyes, you will see that the area within a 90
mile radius of Boulder is crawling with White/Brown/Cox/Christof relatives.

The "hero" of many on JW has his feet nailed to the floor on this one. He
can trot out posters like A.K. with his misinformation, but that is about it.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
___________________________
28. "Luvsflowers"
Posted by lake on 16:29:13 6/01/2000
One word. EVIDENCE. That which Steve Thomas and the BPD do not seem
to think is important before one writes a book based on theory and
speculation.
The Ramseys and their investigators are much, much smarter than Steve
Thomas and the BPD.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
______________________________
32. "The poster A.K"
Posted by lake on 17:33:04 6/01/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 17:33:04, 6/01/2000

Has had an agenda for years. And her agenda has never been JFJBR as far
as I can tell. Her agenda has been ITRAAC. But A.K (by her own admission)
has been in bed with the tabloids from very early on in this case. And so
has FW. A "key witness" in a murder case in bed with the tabloids through a
covey of middlemen and women is highly suspect.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
______________________
85. "Well, fly"
Posted by lake on 13:54:57 6/02/2000
You have not seen that evidence and Thomas is putting his own personal
spin on that evidence you have not seen. But then you trust a corrupt cop
that writes a book using case files of an open investigation and who had
been in bed with the tabloids during the time he worked the case.
Me, I find the MW to be more honest that Thomas has proven to be. Maybe
things will change, but right now MW stands head and shoulders above
Thomas as a human being.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
________________________
1. "Luvs"
Posted by lake on 16:41:47 6/02/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 16:41:47, 6/02/2000

Good questions. But I don't say the mother was there. NJK says her mother
told her by phone one the 12/27/96 that the mother and the neice of NJK
were at the Whites dinner party on 12/25/96.

As far as which party it was, ask the Ramseys the Whites and the BPD. My
bet is that NJK's mother and the neice were there on 12/25/96.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]


2. "But"
Posted by lake on 16:57:07 6/02/2000
Patsy Ramsey says there were two sisters of P. B. White at that dinner
party. I can only account for one sister of P.B. White in what has been fed
to the public. That one is the Allison person that Jams. claims has a last
name of Shoeny. The Heather Cox person is represented as a neice of P.B.
White. I know of a Heather Danialle Cox who would have been about 10
years old at the time of the murder. And a Heather Boykin (maiden name)
who would have been about 21 at the time.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
_________________________
9. "Should be Clear"
Posted by lake on 14:25:23 6/03/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 14:25:23, 6/03/2000

That the Ramsesy and the Whites are misdirecting in this case. The BPD lets
the Ramseys make BPD look like village idiots and the DA lets the Whites
make him look like the village idiot. And the Gov. says the case is on the
right track. Well the right track is probably the siding track that it has been
on for about 2 years.

Fleet White allows the media to present him (for 2 years) as someone that
has the key to solving the case but is just waiting for a trial to let it all
hang out. The Ramseys allow the media to present them as the killers of
their daughter for years. The Ramseys blame the BPD and the Whites blame
the DA for everything that is wrong in this case.

Now, more than 3 years after the killing a woman from Ca. comes forward
with info. that she thinks may have direct or indirect impact on the murder
of JBR. A "match made on heaven" for the Ramseys if they are pulling a
scam. People allegedly connected to some pretty weird behavior with little
grils that are friends with the Whites and have visited the Whites within
days or months of the murder of JBR. But do the Rs and their team jump on
the find publically and demand that the BPD, the FBI and the Russan Army
take these charges seriously because even a tree stump should be able to
see the probabilities that lay within these allegations? No. The Ramseys
move the spotlight to them by taking a PG and debating Steve Thomas on
LKL. Even run out the Psychic sketch of the killer. And not a peep out of
the Ramseys about the "match made in heaven" with the California
connection.

Even FW does not appear to think that it is necessary to publically defend
his family name from the public allegations of the MW. Contrast that to the
need FW had to defend the reputation of the City of Boulder when he said
the DA was destroying the moral of the BPD. Hey, the man had lived in
Boulder only for about 2 years in 1996.

And Beckner just sits at his desk and postures about the need for the FBI to
administer a PG and says he needs to interview the Ramseys seperately
about "new" developments in the case since the end of the GJ. And honest
indian, he tried, but the BPD just could not find any connection between the
MW claims and the killing of JBR.

Could it be any clearer than that?

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
_______________________
27. "Darn It All"
Posted by lake on 20:43:22 6/03/2000
I must have taken a wrong turn. Too many people agree with that post.
Pretend it never happened.
Let me back track here.

But, the beauty of it is that there is no single answer to the WHY of the
obvious suspect behavior of all the players in this case.

1) Did BR do it because of some influence of a juvenile connected to the
Whites and mom coverup without really knowing WHY it had happened but
suspecting that IT MAY HAVE happen?

2) Did some other juvenile connected to the Whites do the deed and BR
played a minor role and PR & JR knew nothing for sure when PR called 911
but suspected the worst and yet "knew in their hearts" that the worst just
could not be?

3) I can't go for the adult killer bit, but that is an option. But this one makes
the weakest option to me. JR and PR are not likely to let any adult abuse
that little girl, kill her and
get away with it. And there is no evidence to suggest that the Rs exhibited
child abuse or child sexual molestation in the past. That is why Thomas had
to come up with that silly hypothesis in his book. But NJK holds the key to
that question regarding the Whites. And Fleet White has not set his hair on
fire publicly denouncing NJK like he did the DA when he was sooo concerned
about the moral of the BPD and how the the JBR case might hurt the tourist
trade in the fine city of Boulder.

And the absence of conclusive evidence does not equate to absence of
invlovement by one in a crime. And that applies to the Whites or one or
more of their guests as well as the Ramseys.
[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
___________________________
33. "OK, But"
Posted by lake on 00:49:33 6/04/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 00:49:33, 6/04/2000

Discount the juvenile angle at your own risk. The BPD has yet to release the
911 tape after more than three years. The BPD has not seen fit to make
public the names sealed at the request of the DA in the search warrent of
the Ramsey home of 12/26/96. The BPD has not seen fit to disclose the
location of and the reason for the search warrent of which the entire
contents still remains under seal after more than three years.

This spells juveniles. And the GJ was sworn to secrecy and the GJ
proceedings are under seal after all the leaking that Thomas and Company
did for the first 18 months of this case. And this spells juvenile involvement
in the crime. BR was the last to appear before the GJ and the day after his
appearance before the GJ it was reported that the BPD was out taking DNA
samples from an exteded family of four. And less than a week later, BR was
officially cleared by the DA and the BPD. Juveniles.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
______________________________
36. "Well, darby"
Posted by lake on 02:07:15 6/04/2000
A naked picture of a baby does not a child molester make. If that were the
case both my parents, the parents of my wife, my next door neighbor and
about 1/2 to 3/4 of the parents in America would be child molesters. And
you have to look to Burke in such a speculation. The Ramseys were much
too free in letting BR go back to school and interact with other kids right
after the murder. Heck, they acted like BR was some stranger if you notice
him in the news clips.
Many just hang on to the Rs and molesters because they need to. Not
because of any evidence of that.
But the close friends of the Rs may be a different matter from the evidence.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
____________________________
57. "Ginja"
Posted by lake on 15:23:27 6/04/2000
NOTE: This message was last edited 15:23:27, 6/04/2000

As long as you understand that you are putting your spin on most
everything, then all is OK.
But Koby said the cops did not look in the room that morining. You spin
against Koby there. Koby talked to the cops in question, you did not and
Ressler seems to be confused about that since he did not say he talked
personally to the cop. And remember that the original disinformation about
the door was that JR was with the cop and the door was painted shut.
Disinformtion.

As far as FW statement that he did not see the body at about 6:30 am, you
take his word for that without question, I suspose. But FW looked into the
room at at about 6:30 and maybe saw no body.
But there was said to be a differecnce in the lighting at the early morning
hour when compared to the lighting at early afternoon when JR is said to
have opened the door and saw the body.

Also were the two men were standing, the size of the two men and the
lighting has been reported to have an effect upon the amount of light that
entered the room. This is a non issue to me. You can spin it any way you
care to and still prove nothing about the issue being debated.

And of course you also must take the word of FW as to why he moved the
blue suitcase, moved broken glass, opened the door to the room of the
body room and returned to the room and picked up the tape removed form
the mouth of JBR after the body was taken up the stairs by JR and Arndt
said she told FW to guard the door to the basement and not let anyone
down there.

But of course you assume the motives of FW were innocent. I find a lot to
suspect about FW. And I would not buy a used car from the man or take is
word alone for anything about this case.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
_________________________
63. "Well, FW"
Posted by lake on 16:27:53 6/04/2000
Is smart enough to know that if he denies the MW charges publically
through a letter to the newspaper of some such way, he has opened himself
up for substantiation of the charges in the media by those that know better
but may not be able to prove the charges in a court of law because of the
lies and coverup by the people involved in the activities. One of those he
said she said things. Sort of like the murder of JBR. If the BPD can't prove
that one, imagine the problems they would have with a child molestation
charge with the baggage of this case hanging over them.

[ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ]
[ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]
___________________________