Page 16 of 34 FirstFirst ... 612131415161718192026 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 192 of 400
  1. #181

    Default

    cynic, I'm sorry to report that I caved and watched a rerun of the Huckabee show. Mostly talk of how John's faith helped him deal with the deaths of two daughters.
    Cherokee, didn't the husband/wife team who conducted the DNA test appear on TV and say the DNA exonerated the Ramseys? If so, did they explain that it was just "touch" DNA?

  2. #182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    cynic, I'm sorry to report that I caved and watched a rerun of the Huckabee show. Mostly talk of how John's faith helped him deal with the deaths of two daughters.
    Cherokee, didn't the husband/wife team who conducted the DNA test appear on TV and say the DNA exonerated the Ramseys? If so, did they explain that it was just "touch" DNA?
    Bode Labs basically used the Ramsey case as an infomercial to drum up business for their "touch" DNA testing, which they'd only been doing for three years prior to lab analysis on parts of JonBenet's longjohns. That was the only article of clothing tested; not the oversized panties or JonBenet's top (near the neck), where the stager would have possibly touched her. There were no follow-up tests done, nor was the result replicated by another lab or independently verified. All we have is Bode Labs and Mary Lacy's word for it.

    "Touch" DNA is still not a fully-approved method of scientific inquiry. It is difficult to get a good sample due to contamination because of the nature of "touch" DNA. In addition, the longjohns had been handled by numerous people along the evidence chain. Mary Lacy refused to say if the DNA from any of those people had been tested against the alleged "touch" DNA found by Bode Labs. Her refusal to answer questions and/or release the "touch" DNA results so they could be independently verified speaks volumes.

    Lacy got what she wanted from Bode Labs (alleged DNA that wasn't a Ramsey), and they got what they wanted from Lacy (free publicity that resulted in a business boom).

    What is unsaid in all this is that even IF the "touch" DNA is truly that of another person other than a Ramsey, it doesn't preclude or exhonerate the Ramseys from being involved in JonBenet's death and/or staging of the crime scene. It could be innocent transfer. If the sample was only tested against the DNA of John, Patsy and Burke Ramsey, there are other people who could have touched those longjohns; including friends, LE and lab workers.

  3. #183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    Dear Mr. Ramsey,
    We know who murdered your child, and so do you.
    KK,
    There has been some discussion here about which Ramsey was the perpetrator; what evidence do you think marks a specific family member as the killer?
    Last edited by rashomon; March 24, 2012, 3:23 am at Sat Mar 24 3:23:37 UTC 2012.

  4. #184

    Default

    There was a story a couple of years ago (on 48 HOURS, I think) about a murder in Fort Collins, CO, that used Bode Labs to exonerate the alleged killer many years later. At the time of the murder, the man arrested was a teenager. He was arrested when he was in his 20s. He spent many years in prison until Bode found DNA that did not match his. He was released from prison and sued the police department. I always thought this man was not the killer, but after I heard that Bode was involved, I now have my doubts.

  5. #185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    cynic, I'm sorry to report that I caved and watched a rerun of the Huckabee show. Mostly talk of how John's faith helped him deal with the deaths of two daughters.
    If you really want to suffer you might consider watching the Daystar interview.
    http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...&postcount=173
    It's by far the worst and not for the faint of heart.

  6. #186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    … didn't the husband/wife team who conducted the DNA test appear on TV and say the DNA exonerated the Ramseys? If so, did they explain that it was just "touch" DNA?
    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    There was a story a couple of years ago (on 48 HOURS, I think) about a murder in Fort Collins, CO, that used Bode Labs to exonerate the alleged killer many years later. At the time of the murder, the man arrested was a teenager. He was arrested when he was in his 20s. He spent many years in prison until Bode found DNA that did not match his. He was released from prison and sued the police department. I always thought this man was not the killer, but after I heard that Bode was involved, I now have my doubts.
    Carol, looking at these two posts, it seems that you might be under the impression that the husband and wife team, Richard and Selma Eikelenboom, are affiliated with Bode Labs.
    The Eikelenbooms are Dutch forensic scientists who run Independent Forensic Sciences, also known as the “Crime Farm” in the Netherlands. They offer bloodstain analysis, and DNA testing among their services.
    Richard Eikelenboom recently testified for the defense in the Casey Anthony trial.
    The Eikelenbooms are working on their PhDs at the University of Denver and are looking to open a lab in Colorado.
    http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_12...#ixzz1q4GYLHzB

    Their only involvement in the JonBenet case is the following:
    “Linda Wheeler-Holloway, a former Fort Collins detective who became involved in the Tim Masters DNA-based exoneration case, said she and DNA forensic specialists Richard and Selma Eikelenboom of Holland presented "touch DNA" testing to the Boulder County district attorney's office in October 2006.
    The district attorney's office never followed up, according to Wheeler-Holloway. Until Wednesday, she was unaware that Boulder County had pursued such a method.”


    Lacy has never mentioned this meeting and, as a matter of fact, attributes her knowledge of touch DNA to attending a course at West Virginia University.

    In December of 2002, the Boulder District Attorney’s Office, under Mary T. Lacy, assumed responsibility for the investigation of the JonBenet Ramsey homicide. Since then, this office has worked with the Boulder Police Department to continue the investigation of this crime.
    In early August of 2007, District Attorney Lacy attended a Continuing Education Program in West Virginia sponsored by the National Institute of Justice on Forensic Biology and DNA. The presenters discussed successful outcomes from a new methodology described as “touch DNA.” One method for sampling for touch DNA is the “scraping method.” In this process, forensic scientists scrape a surface where there is no observable stain or other indication of possible DNA in an effort to recover for analysis any genetic material that might nonetheless be present. This methodology was not well known in this country until recently and is still used infrequently
    .
    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news...38/detail.html

    This course allegedly inspired her to contact Bode Labs to conduct touch DNA testing on evidence selected by her and her investigators

    In October of 2007, we decided to pursue the possibility of submitting additional items from the JonBenet Ramsey homicide to be examined using this methodology. We checked with a number of Colorado sources regarding which private laboratory to use for this work. Based upon multiple recommendations, including that of the Boulder Police Department, we contacted the Bode Technology Group located near Washington, D.C., and initiated discussions with the professionals at that laboratory. First Assistant District Attorney Peter Maguire and Investigator Andy Horita spent a full day with staff members at the Bode facility in early December of 2007.
    The Bode Technology laboratory applied the “touch DNA” scraping method to both sides of the waist area of the long johns that JonBenet Ramsey was wearing over her underwear when her body was discovered.

    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news...38/detail.html

    The case you are referring to in Fort Collins is the 1987 murder of Peggy Hettrick which was featured on 48 Hours. Tim Masters was eventually exonerated on the basis of touch DNA findings presented by the Eikelenbooms. Masters spent about nine and a half years in prison. Bode was not involved in the Tim Masters case.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4630559.shtml
    Last edited by cynic; March 24, 2012, 6:50 pm at Sat Mar 24 18:50:50 UTC 2012.

  7. #187

    Default

    Wow. I had totally forgotten that JR was going to have a new book out. (Then again, I haven't been following the case like I once had.)

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee View Post
    I think that Patsy's comment about thinking of JB in her coffin when she saw the MyTwinn doll was something that she thought AFTER JB was killed, not a "premonition". Rushing about the house in the aftermath of the murder, I can picture Patsy glancing at that doll still in its box and thinking exactly that.
    Patsy also makes another striking revelation in her book when she tells us for the first time about her "premonition" of JonBenet's death. On Christmas Eve, she was wrapping the special look-alike Twinn doll for JonBenet. As she opened the box, for a moment Patsy had a striking image of JonBenet lying in a coffin. Patsy further revealed that that year she had decorated the Christmas tree in purple--for the first time ever--symbolic of Christ's death and atonement, because she had been struck by that color during the previous Lent season. Her own explanation for this incident was that she had unconsciously been psychic about JonBenet's impending death. However, a more logical explanation exists: Murder was unconsciously on Patsy's mind as her rage toward JonBenet and John grew. Her fear of JonBenet's death was actually a forbidden wish. This is classic psychoanalytic theory, validated by years of experience. The conscious mind disguises a secret impulse, the wish, as a fear in order to make it acceptable.--Hodges; Who Will Speak for JonBenet, pg 226

  8. #188

    Default

    cynic, thanks for clearing that up for me (although I think I'm still a little confused). What do you think of the Tim Masters' case? Those violent and disturbing pictures he sketched of women (even when he was an adult) really makes me think he has a deep hatred for women. Of course, that doesn't make him a murderer.

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    cynic, thanks for clearing that up for me (although I think I'm still a little confused). What do you think of the Tim Masters' case? Those violent and disturbing pictures he sketched of women (even when he was an adult) really makes me think he has a deep hatred for women. Of course, that doesn't make him a murderer.
    This quote seems to fit this very well:

    Be careful of your thoughts- they become your words.
    Your words become your actions.
    Your actions become your character.

    People like that will act on their thoughts when they get the chance.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rashomon View Post
    KK,
    There has been some discussion here about which Ramsey was the perpetrator; what evidence do you think marks a specific family member as the killer?
    KK may not have seen your post, rashomon. Nice to see you back!

    I think the evidence of the head injury which came first could have been caused by Patsy, in a rage, throwing JonBenét against the bath tub or toilet because of JB's bedwetting. Delmar England and Steve Thomas also thought this if my memory serves me right (?).
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    rashomon, you were in close touch with Delmar too. We can never forget his garrote analysis. I'm so glad Peggy wrote her book including these.
    btw I correspond with Delmar's nephew. So in a way, I'm still in touch with Delmar.

    Easywriter (Delmar England)

    Evidence Vs Pretense II
    http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4816&highlight=Delmar+England


    The body of JonBenet was found in the Ramsey house. Along with
    the body was found a bogus ransom note, a phony bound and gagged
    scene inclusive of am amateurish "strangling device" that doesn’t
    work. The rigged portrait of death by strangulation exists
    alongside a very real fatal, or near fatal, skull fracture. The
    singular purpose of the "garrote scene" was to divert attention
    from the skull fracture as primary. The amateurish staging tells
    the story, the real story of accidental head injury with
    subsequent attempt to cover up the truth.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  12. #192

    Smile

    Okay, I know it's the Natl Enquirer... but... it says:

    ...John... has broken his years of silence on the devastating tragedy. In his riveting new book he reveals exactly what happened in the family home that fateful day, details of the police probe and much more.
    For those of you have read this book - did he REALLY reveal what happened that night, or is it just the same old stuff??

    Also:
    I vowed I would spend every dime I had to find the killer of my daughter.
    I truly doubt he's done that!

    and this:
    A mistake I made in those early hours after finding JonBenet missing was to assume the police knew what they were doing. I should have called anyone and everyone I knew who could possibly bring resources and attention to bear on finding JonBenet.
    Finding JonBenet? They did find her...
    ~~"Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    I came, I saw, I stuck around!~~



Similar Threads

  1. Tom Miller's Side-By-side Comparison of Patsy's Exemplars To the Ransom Note
    By rashomon in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: August 27, 2006, 1:59 pm, Sun Aug 27 13:59:48 UTC 2006
  2. "RE: Margoo's soapbox again" - John Ramsey compared to Marc Klaas & John Walsh
    By "J_R" in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 25, 2004, 12:25 pm, Fri Jun 25 12:25:46 UTC 2004
  3. Patsy Ramsey & John Ramsey - BPD Interviews (Atlanta) - August 28, 2000
    By Tricia in forum Transcripts: Ramsey murder case
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 15, 2004, 1:29 am, Sat May 15 1:29:53 UTC 2004
  4. John Ramsey, "There is a perverse side of me..."
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: April 4, 2004, 1:33 pm, Sun Apr 4 13:33:26 UTC 2004
  5. New Book on JonBenet Ramsey
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: November 10, 2003, 7:54 am, Mon Nov 10 7:54:36 UTC 2003

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •