Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 72 of 75
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    Not to mention, there's a lot Thomas didn't mention in his book. The RST claimed to be so disappointed when his book came out because he didn't give up evidence not already in the public. Unlike Lou Smit, I should say.

    My guess would be Thomas knows a lot more than he revealed. As do many others who won't come out publicly with the truth for various reasons, IMO.
    Wasn't it ST who said that the public knows only about 10% of the evidence?
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    Well, we're still waiting.... It's not too late for the truth to be revealed. Ever.
    This was the thread I was enjoying when I had to go for therapy for a stiff neck. Dammit! I had to avoid the computer and go for therapy. It will take me for ever to catch up.

    KK, did you notice in this thread we spoke about people who talked too fast. I liked Peter Boyle's voice and you were ready to bash him one. :-)
    I personally think you have one of the best speaking voices I have heard lately. So there! Yes! I have always loved listening to someone who has a good voice.

    I have my favourites. Richard Burton was No.1 with me when it came to speaking.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  3. #63

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle_1 View Post
    This was the thread I was enjoying when I had to go for therapy for a stiff neck. Dammit! I had to avoid the computer and go for therapy. It will take me for ever to catch up.

    KK, did you notice in this thread we spoke about people who talked too fast. I liked Peter Boyle's voice and you were ready to bash him one. :-)
    I personally think you have one of the best speaking voices I have heard lately. So there! Yes! I have always loved listening to someone who has a good voice.

    I have my favourites. Richard Burton was No.1 with me when it came to speaking.
    AWWWW. That's so sweet of you to say, Elle. I did have some training when I was young, in college, etc. But like I said, that's long ago, so I don't really think about it anymore.

    Yes, Burton did have an awesome voice.

    I'll have to go back and read again, Elle. I barely remember anything for long any more if I'm not repeating it, but seems Boyle irritated me because he wouldn't shut up and let his guests talk. This drove me crazy in a lot of Ramsey interviews, especially when questioned by LE as I would shout (while reading the transcripts): "QUIT FEEDING HER THE ANSWERS! LET HER SPEAK! QUIT INTERRUPTING!"

    Oh well, opportunities missed--some probably deliberately.

    Anyway, thank you for your support, Elle. I'm not a professional like Tricia, so it means a lot.

    Also, hope your neck is much better.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  4. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee View Post
    Wasn't it ST who said that the public knows only about 10% of the evidence?
    I think Mike Kane also said something similar. If we ever got those files, I think we'd know exactly what happened and who did what.

    I also think we'd know everyone who was in on the cover up, too.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    AWWWW. That's so sweet of you to say, Elle. I did have some training when I was young, in college, etc. But like I said, that's long ago, so I don't really think about it anymore.

    Yes, Burton did have an awesome voice.

    I'll have to go back and read again, Elle. I barely remember anything for long any more if I'm not repeating it, but seems Boyle irritated me because he wouldn't shut up and let his guests talk. This drove me crazy in a lot of Ramsey interviews, especially when questioned by LE as I would shout (while reading the transcripts): "QUIT FEEDING HER THE ANSWERS! LET HER SPEAK! QUIT INTERRUPTING!"

    Oh well, opportunities missed--some probably deliberately.

    Anyway, thank you for your support, Elle. I'm not a professional like Tricia, so it means a lot.

    Also, hope your neck is much better.
    No need to backtrack, KK. I think we all repeat what we say here. It's good to let people know how they came over when it comes to something like a radio broadcast. This is not easy when you're not doing it every day like the pros. Your training paid off!

    One has to pay for Physio in Canada. $25.00 first visit. $15 for every other one. Gave up the treatment. It wasn't helping after 10. I'm back to using my own infra red gadget.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  6. #66

    Default

    Since this is a parody, I thought I would post this here.
    It is an edited version of an old MADtv sketch.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nCfIoy5JrA

  7. #67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynic View Post
    Since this is a parody, I thought I would post this here.
    It is an edited version of an old MADtv sketch.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nCfIoy5JrA
    That's a parody? How can you tell?

    Thanks, cynic. I needed that!

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Southern Silicon Valley !!
    Posts
    2,285

    Arrow

    Cynic, It's interesting to note that way back when this was done there were folks who were brave enough not to drink the Ramsey "kool-aid". It seemed that for a time FFJ was about the only forum that actually shouted their guilt. Now so many more are beginning to see the light...well almost anyway. Heh!
    "When are we going to get our heads out of the sand and understand that sometimes really nice people who look good on the outside are dastardly on the inside." Wendy Murphy, former prosecutor, MA

  9. #69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    That's a parody? How can you tell?

    Thanks, cynic. I needed that!
    Hmm, perhaps I was a bit hasty with that assumption.

    If you liked that, you will most likely find the romantic comedy, “Blameless in Boulder,” to be amusing.
    The premise is that JR an PR are coaching Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan to accurately portray them in a movie.
    Patsy: “I mean Meg Ryan, who would not kill to have her portray them in a movie; I know I did, uh, would.”

    Blameless in Boulder:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FDB20nAOqs



  10. #70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoomama View Post
    Cynic, It's interesting to note that way back when this was done there were folks who were brave enough not to drink the Ramsey "kool-aid". It seemed that for a time FFJ was about the only forum that actually shouted their guilt. Now so many more are beginning to see the light...well almost anyway. Heh!
    It might really return to those days once Tricia's secret is revealed, hopefully.

  11. #71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynic View Post
    Hmm, perhaps I was a bit hasty with that assumption.

    If you liked that, you will most likely find the romantic comedy, “Blameless in Boulder,” to be amusing.
    The premise is that JR an PR are coaching Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan to accurately portray them in a movie.
    Patsy: “I mean Meg Ryan, who would not kill to have her portray them in a movie; I know I did, uh, would.”

    Blameless in Boulder:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FDB20nAOqs


    Please tell me you have this locked up in a deposit box in a bank vault in Switzerland! It might be better than South Park's "Butters"! The male actors aren't anything special, but the women are ROCKING IT! Of course, it's all about a woman anyway, isn't it?

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  12. #72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynic View Post
    Since this is a parody, I thought I would post this here.
    It is an edited version of an old MADtv sketch.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nCfIoy5JrA
    TV HOST: "John and Patsy, what do the initials DNA stand for?"

    PATSY: "Ah, that's easy ... uh, Do Not Answer, at least not without an attorney present!"

    Bwaaaahaaaa!



Similar Threads

  1. Peter Boyles talks about the recent Grand Jury revelation (Jan. 28 & 29, 2013)
    By cynic in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: January 21, 2017, 5:38 pm, Sat Jan 21 17:38:04 UTC 2017
  2. Peter Boyles 2
    By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: August 25, 2006, 10:27 am, Fri Aug 25 10:27:00 UTC 2006
  3. Good News. Peter Boyles will feature New Times article on Wed. show
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: August 24, 2006, 7:48 am, Thu Aug 24 7:48:33 UTC 2006

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •