Results 109 to 111 of 111
-
February 10, 2013, 12:26 am, Sun Feb 10 0:26:46 UTC 2013 #109
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 4,288
-
April 15, 2017, 10:47 am, Sat Apr 15 10:47:36 UTC 2017 #110
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Posts
- 132
Continuing On . . .
While many may have viewed the recent Brennan and Vaughn investigative report revealed in the Daily Camera last October, if they've not been following the misinterpretations and outright lies about the DNA, they would miss how truly mind-blowing the article is. What is paramount to remember, imo, is DA ML’s drum beat that “matching DNA” between the long johns and the underwear meant there was no innocent explanation for its existence. She was emphatic that this proved it was an Intruder.
DA ML’s claim was the big trigger for this analysis by DNA experts who reviewed the BODE tDNA reports specifically in the context of the Unk male 1 DNA. ML created the connection between the long johns tDNA and the DNA in the underwear. The facts of too many alleles on parts of the long johns pointing to multiple DNA contributors and too weak DNA on the underwear which could not be replicated for verification, simply equaled what the article references as “twin realities . . . that the genetic profile may not be from a single individual and that DNA on the girl’s clothing may have landed their innocently.”
It’s too much to hope that the media (or some promoters of the Intruder theory) might understand the determination of experts. Their conclusions point to the irreality of DNA as relevant to the crime.
-
April 15, 2017, 11:03 am, Sat Apr 15 11:03:06 UTC 2017 #111
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Posts
- 132
I’d be remiss if I did not mention ML had help in spreading DNA falsehoods. One of the myths involved linking DNA from underneath JB’s fingernails to the DNA in the underwear. Not until Kolar’s book came out and it was discovered how much foreign DNA had been found and what DNA testing had been performed, did FFJ posters, namely cynic, uncover that the private investigators for the family had circulated an additional fable. (http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...726#post190726)
The claim of John San Agustin and Ollie Gray (private investigators for the Rs) helped construct another public myth that the DNA under the nails was the same as the DNA in the underwear. Read cynic’s post to understand why this was a huge fiction. Amazingly this tale was shared on many programs - CNN, Fox News and Nancy Grace, to name a few. San Agustin in particular became what I call an official DNA ‘puffer.’**
One will always have to wonder why ML took this path of 'exoneration' via DNA when she had been told about multiple contributors to the tDNA.She only gave one explanation which involved discovering a butt print she knew belonged to the killer and being desperate to shield the R family.
As for the Rs’ private investigators, it’s been shared on the Internet that Gray has recently passed away. But San Agustin has some bigger ‘fish to fry’, beyond defending his DNA fable. http://gazette.com/former-el-paso-sh...rticle/1594505
This past January former sheriff department Commander John San Agustin was scheduled to be arraigned in a fraudulent scheme. The former Commander, along with another former sheriff department supervisor Paula Presley and former Sheriff Terry Maketa, were indicted last May and accused of involvement in a plan to jail a victim of domestic violence in order to protect a former sheriff’s deputy.
As of March 6, 2017, attorneys for Presley and San Agustin asked for their next court date to be in the summer after former Sheriff Terry Maketa’s trial, "once the dust settles." The judge settled for middle ground and scheduled their date for May 8 which will occur before Maketa's trial. Stay tuned.
**It’s ironic that San Agustin, has been indicted for participation in a fraudulent scheme. I always thought ‘puffer’ was derived from ‘puffery’ or exaggerated endorsement. But there’s actually a legal definition of ‘puffer’ and it’s described as someone employed to bid up an item at auction for the purpose of raising the price upon bona fide bidders. (Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006) It’s considered fraud which invalidates the sale.
Similar Threads
-
CNN Interviews James Kolar (Oct 26, 2013)
By cynic in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 18Last Post: October 28, 2013, 3:56 pm, Mon Oct 28 15:56:28 UTC 2013 -
Sexual Behavior Problems (SBP) - from James Kolar's book about Ramsey case
By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 159Last Post: December 24, 2012, 11:24 am, Mon Dec 24 11:24:14 UTC 2012 -
Where to buy James Kolar's book: "Foreign Faction - Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet"
By Cherokee in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 49Last Post: August 18, 2012, 12:35 pm, Sat Aug 18 12:35:36 UTC 2012 -
James Kolar's new book! It's what we have been waiting for! Daily Beast article!
By Moab in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 308Last Post: August 14, 2012, 10:11 pm, Tue Aug 14 22:11:18 UTC 2012 -
Listen to James Kolar talk about new book on Tricia's show tonight! (July 18, 2012)
By Cherokee in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 24Last Post: July 19, 2012, 8:43 pm, Thu Jul 19 20:43:59 UTC 2012
The Suspicious Death of Rebecca...
June 14, 2018, 9:10 pm, Thu Jun 14 21:10:09 UTC 2018 in Crimes, Trials & Missing Persons