Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 81
  1. #1

    Default Weapon used on JonBenet's skull: golf club or flashlight?

    Impressions made by a golf club and flashlight:

    Golf club socket and heel area:







    Golf club parts:



    Flashlight:





    Assumptions:
    Burke’s arm length was 21 inches
    Burke was able to rotate his arm at a burst speed of 3 revolutions per second. (A very fast, violent swing.) (By way of comparison, competitive volleyball spikes and softball “windmill” speeds are 5 revolutions per second.)
    9 iron golf club head weight of 10 ounces.
    Average PGA golf swing speed: 114 mph, or 167 feet per second.
    Burke was able to swing a golf club at 70 fps.
    Maglite flashlight weight of 2 pounds
    Maglite was held near the bottom
    Surface area of depressed skull fracture (1.75” x 0.5”,) is 0.875 sq. in.
    45 foot-pounds of kinetic energy was sufficient to produce a depressed skull fracture in that region of the skull of JonBenet.
    Primary formulas used:
    Kinetic energy = 0.5 * mass * velocity squared
    Velocity = Angular velocity * radius

    Regions of the skull:



    Skull density:



    Bone thickness of a human skull. Three-dimensional Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the skull of a human child, in side view. The parietal bone is mapped in colours depicting bone thickness: light blue to yellow (0.5-2.5 millimetres); red to dark blue (3-5 millimetres). The bone thickness mapping by computer shows local variation of thickness in the human skull. This map was used to compare human skull thickness with fossil skull thickness of a Neanderthal child found at Devil's Tower, Gibraltar. Human skulls prove to be thinner than Neanderthal skulls. Research at the Anthropologis- ches Institut, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
    http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/302666/enlarge

    The skull varies greatly in thickness-not only in different individuals, but also at different parts-a point which must be kept in mind when trephining. Speaking generally, it is thickest over the frontal and occipital regions, attaining a maximum at the posterior occipital protuberance, and is thinnest over the squamous portion of the temporal.http://bookdome.com/health/anatomy/S...al-Region.html

    The temporal and parietal regions are the thinnest cranial boned and the most common sites of accidental fracture. The thickest cranial bones are the frontal and occipital. Occipital fractures are related to more serious brain injury due to the increased force necessary to generate a fracture in the thickest bone of the skull.
    Nursing Care of the Pediatric Neurosurgery Patient, edited by Cathy Cartwright, Donna C. Wallace, page 150

    Force required to cause a depressed fracture in JonBenet’s skull in the posteroparietal region:

    Modern studies of skull fractures conducted by the American military demonstrate that it takes a minimum of 90 foot-pounds delivered over 1 square inch to fracture the human skull with a blow delivered to the front of the head. If the blow is delivered to the temporal/parietal area, 45 foot-pounds will produce a fracture. A blow to the zygomatic region, the bony arch on either side of the face below and around the eye, requires only 18 foot-pounds of force to produce a fracture. A mace weighing 1.8 pounds can be swung at a speed of 60 feet per second by the human arm so as to generate 101 foot-pounds of energy on impact, more than enough to fracture a human skull at its strongest point.
    From Sumer to Rome: The Military Capabilities of Ancient Armies,Richard A. Gabriel, Karen S. Metz, page 57

    Skull and Brain: Upon reflection of the scalp there is found to be an extensive area of scalp hemorrhage along the right temporoparietal area extending from the orbital ridge, posteriorly all the way to the occipital area. This encompasses an area measuring approximately 7x4 inches. This grossly appears to be fresh hemorrhage with no evidence of organization. At the superior extension of the is area of hemorrhage is a linear to comminuted skull fracture which extends from the right occipital to posteroparietal area forward to the right frontal area across the parietal skull. In the posteroparietal area of this fracture is a roughly rectangular shaped displaced fragment of skull measuring one and three-quarters by one-half inch. The hemorrhage and the fracture extend posteriorly just past the midline of the occipital area of the skull. This fracture measures approximately 8.5 inches in length. On removal of the skull cap there is found to be a thin film of subdural hemorrhage measuring approximately 7-8 cc over the surface of the right cerebral hemisphere and extending to the base of the cerebral hemisphere.Excerpt from JonBenet’s autopsy report.

    Conclusions:

    The golf club is the winner in this showdown.
    While Spitz assures us that the Maglite was capable of producing the injury to JonBenet’s skull, I’m not so sure.
    Dr. Werner Spitz, the forensic pathologist, even ran macabre tests to see if the heavy flashlight could have inflicted the kind of massive skull fracture that was found on JonBenét. To do so, a child’s cadaver was obtained so he could strike the skull with a similar flashlight and examine the resulting injury pattern. He said the results were consistent, that the damage could have been caused by the flashlight—but it could also have been caused by other things.
    JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 267

    The first problem is the shape of the depressed skull fracture. It is a rectangular/ovoid shape while a flashlight would generally leave a crescent shaped depression if struck on an angle.
    I do recognize that a depression doesn’t always slavishly follow the shape of the object responsible because of density irregularities in the skull, but there should be some degree of similarity and there is none there that I can see.
    The second problem is the long linear fracture extending down to the frontal area of the skull.
    If the blow was struck as depicted by Spitz, I find it difficult to imagine how the linear fracture would have occurred given the direction of the force. Perhaps if it followed a suture line it would be somewhat understandable, but it does not.
    The final problem that I have is that while the force required to cause the fracture using the Maglite is conceivable in the hands of Burke, it is at the outer limit of his ability, IMO.
    It would be considerably more likely in the hands of an adult.
    The one advantage the Maglite would have over the golf club would be that the Maglite would be less likely to lacerate the scalp because of the rubberized edge.

    By contrast:
    The socket and heel region of the golf club will leave a rectangular impression.
    The direction of force and possible interaction with the shaft of the golf club would more readily produce the long linear fracture found in the skull of JonBenet.
    The force required to cause the fracture is well within the physical ability of Burke if he swung a golf club as a weapon, IMO.

    The other potential object that is sometimes discussed is a baseball bat.
    I don’t think this is as likely as either of the above, because of the large surface area that would probably make contact with the skull, thereby producing either a linear fracture or a significantly larger depressed fracture than what is seen in the JonBenet case.

    With respect to a PDI scenario involving a violent push or perhaps a swing of Jonbenet into a rounded edge as opposed to JonBenet being stationary and struck by an object, the speed necessary to produce a fracture would be approximately 8 feet per second. What is uncertain is whether enough velocity is there to produce a depressed fracture rather than the more probable linear fracture. It can’t be ruled out, though, IMO.
    Last edited by cynic; August 20, 2012, 2:56 am at Mon Aug 20 2:56:05 UTC 2012.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Very impressive work, cynic. Thank you for the time taken. Between the two photographs, the golf club matches the injury on JonBenét's scalp better
    than the flashlight photo.

    I'm now wondering how this injury occurred(?) JonBenét sitting at the table eating her pineapple (?). I believe golf clubs were mentioned as Christmas presents. So they were maybe close at hand near the kitchen (?). I had opted more for the flashlight on the kitchen counter.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Yes, very impressive. Did you say you are an engineer? I have 2 scientists in my immediate family and this is how they approach a problem, very detailed and logical.

    Your observation at the end, about the possible violent contact with a faucet or the edge of a toilet or bathtub, has summed up my problem with that scenario. Also, as you observe about the baseball bat, I think such a contact (assuming one could get enough force/speed up) would also leave a larger area of impact, but not a depressed fracture like JonBenet had. That fracture had to have been caused by a relatively small object, but one that could be struck with a force hard enough to cause the fracture as well as the linear crack away from it.

    I really think that we are narrowing things down to a golf club being the instrument that caused JonBenet's skull fracture. It also fits very well with John's comment about Pam retrieving his golf bag from her evidence raid.
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  4. #4

    Default

    Fantastic work, Cynic!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    southern california
    Posts
    374

    Default wow

    I always thought John wanted his golf clubs because evidence was hidden in the bag but, based on Kolar's book and Cynic's amazing work, I now believe a golf club was the weapon.

  6. #6
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    I'm with you, Pearl. Why did John want his golf clubs retrieved from the house?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    1. Why didn't the police jump all over John Ramsey because he was asking for his clubs to be removed from a crime scene?

    2. Why did the police allow Patsy's sister Pam to retrieve items from a crime scene? Absolutely ridiculous!

    3. This crime will be forever remembered for the way the police handled the Ramseys with kid gloves. Unbelievable!
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  8. #8

    Default

    Wasn't there a report of a golf club on the lawn with a blonde hair on it?

    What did LE decide about that?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Learnin View Post
    Wasn't there a report of a golf club on the lawn with a blonde hair on it?

    What did LE decide about that?
    Oh, THAT??? The intruder dropped it just after he slid quietly out of the window after using the suitcase as a stepping stool, ignoring the real stepping stool that was right there near the window. The intruder had been practicing his putts in the basement room while waiting for an opportunity to get out of the house after his assault of JonBenet. He had long blonde hair which is not uncommon for men in Boulder CO.

    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  10. #10

    Default

    Very impressive, cynic! I had been doing some work on exactly this, but I'm glad you started it because I'm not nearly as thorough as you always are.

    If you don't mind, I'll add some of the things I had been looking at to your thread that might help too.

    First, I'd like to establish exactly where the depressed fracture occurred, because I was surprised at how wrong my impression was once I drew it out. I think I know why I had the wrong impression, but I won't share that until the end to see if others were under the same impression (I know by looking at that silly photo of Dr. Spitz that he was.).

    I won't repost that lurid autopsy photo -- we've all seen it, we know what it looks like. But picture it in your mind and place your fingers on your head where you think the depressed fracture was on JonBenet's head. C'mon... group experiment -- no one's looking -- put your fingers up on your scalp where you think the hole in JonBenet's skull was.

    The following is an overhead drawing of a child's skull in an approximate position as the alleged X-ray of JonBenet's skull posted next to it. Obviously it is of a much younger child because the anterior fontanelle is still open, so just disregard that; but the reason I used this one is because it shows the sutures (lambdoidal, sagittal, and coronal). In it I've placed an oval where, according to the AR, the comminuted fracture was.



    Notice where the fracture is in relation to the lambdoid and sagittal sutures and then see if it doesn't agree with this sketch showing the skull horizontally from the back:



    Now see if you agree that the depressed fracture would be located in the area shown in the following diagram with a red arc (although it should be further away to the right side away from center or the sagittal suture):



    Now honestly, is that much lower and to to rear than what you pictured in your mind?

    Does this not indicate that the assailant would almost have to be striking from behind?

    And one more question... Is Dr. Spitz full of it?

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynic View Post
    Impressions made by a golf club and flashlight:

    Golf club socket and heel area:







    Golf club parts:



    Flashlight:






    The golf club is the winner in this showdown.
    While Spitz assures us that the Maglite was capable of producing the injury to JonBenet’s skull, I’m not so sure.
    Dr. Werner Spitz, the forensic pathologist, even ran macabre tests to see if the heavy flashlight could have inflicted the kind of massive skull fracture that was found on JonBenét. To do so, a child’s cadaver was obtained so he could strike the skull with a similar flashlight and examine the resulting injury pattern. He said the results were consistent, that the damage could have been caused by the flashlight—but it could also have been caused by other things.
    JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 267

    The first problem is the shape of the depressed skull fracture. It is a rectangular/ovoid shape while a flashlight would generally leave a crescent shaped depression if struck on an angle.
    I do recognize that a depression doesn’t always slavishly follow the shape of the object responsible because of density irregularities in the skull, but there should be some degree of similarity and there is none there that I can see.
    The second problem is the long linear fracture extending down to the frontal area of the skull.
    If the blow was struck as depicted by Spitz, I find it difficult to imagine how the linear fracture would have occurred given the direction of the force. Perhaps if it followed a suture line it would be somewhat understandable, but it does not.
    The final problem that I have is that while the force required to cause the fracture using the Maglite is conceivable in the hands of Burke, it is at the outer limit of his ability, IMO.
    It would be considerably more likely in the hands of an adult.
    The one advantage the Maglite would have over the golf club would be that the Maglite would be less likely to lacerate the scalp because of the rubberized edge.

    By contrast:
    The socket and heel region of the golf club will leave a rectangular impression.
    The direction of force and possible interaction with the shaft of the golf club would more readily produce the long linear fracture found in the skull of JonBenet.
    The force required to cause the fracture is well within the physical ability of Burke if he swung a golf club as a weapon, IMO.
    Once again, a brilliant post, Cynic! Excellent scientific analysis and exposition! Well done!

    I am now, more than ever, convinced that a golf club was the weapon used to inflict the head blow on JonBenet that resulted in the skull fracture.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by otg View Post
    Very impressive, cynic! I had been doing some work on exactly this, but I'm glad you started it because I'm not nearly as thorough as you always are.

    If you don't mind, I'll add some of the things I had been looking at to your thread that might help too.

    First, I'd like to establish exactly where the depressed fracture occurred, because I was surprised at how wrong my impression was once I drew it out. I think I know why I had the wrong impression, but I won't share that until the end to see if others were under the same impression (I know by looking at that silly photo of Dr. Spitz that he was.).

    I won't repost that lurid autopsy photo -- we've all seen it, we know what it looks like. But picture it in your mind and place your fingers on your head where you think the depressed fracture was on JonBenet's head. C'mon... group experiment -- no one's looking -- put your fingers up on your scalp where you think the hole in JonBenet's skull was.

    The following is an overhead drawing of a child's skull in an approximate position as the alleged X-ray of JonBenet's skull posted next to it. Obviously it is of a much younger child because the anterior fontanelle is still open, so just disregard that; but the reason I used this one is because it shows the sutures (lambdoidal, sagittal, and coronal). In it I've placed an oval where, according to the AR, the comminuted fracture was.



    Notice where the fracture is in relation to the lambdoid and sagittal sutures and then see if it doesn't agree with this sketch showing the skull horizontally from the back:



    Now see if you agree that the depressed fracture would be located in the area shown in the following diagram with a red arc (although it should be further away to the right side away from center or the sagittal suture):



    Now honestly, is that much lower and to to rear than what you pictured in your mind?

    Does this not indicate that the assailant would almost have to be striking from behind?

    And one more question... Is Dr. Spitz full of it?
    Another excellent and informative post, OTG! Fantastic and well illustrated! I do believe the head blow came from behind and have thought that for quite some time now. Your post reveals just how far to the rear the head blow landed and how next to impossible it would have been for the blow to have come from the side or front of JonBenet.

    And yes, Dr. Spitz is full of it.



Similar Threads

  1. JonBenet's Skull Fractures: The Weapon
    By otg in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 394
    Last Post: July 11, 2013, 1:27 pm, Thu Jul 11 13:27:32 UTC 2013
  2. Burke did it with a flashlight
    By VP in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: October 11, 2010, 11:23 pm, Mon Oct 11 23:23:03 UTC 2010
  3. JonBenet's skull and the way her face was turned....
    By Golden_Rose in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 18, 2008, 7:26 pm, Tue Mar 18 19:26:53 UTC 2008
  4. Worst Foursome In Golf
    By Nandee in forum Forums for Justice - Crime Forums
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 27, 2002, 9:33 pm, Wed Feb 27 21:33:36 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •