Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 70
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    1,000 miles from nowhere
    Posts
    165

    Default

    That was my first thought too.

    I am totally bumfuzzled at people who give so little credence to a grand jury true bill. It is scary to think these people are allowed to vote.

  2. #14

    Post

    Thanks cynic. My first thought about Paula Woodward is that she's gone from following Denver Public Work employees around to shilling for the Ramseys...Good gawd...Not much of a leap...LOL

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BOESP View Post
    That was my first thought too.

    I am totally bumfuzzled at people who give so little credence to a grand jury true bill. It is scary to think these people are allowed to vote.
    At least in Colorado, they have the excuse of having legal pot available.
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  4. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tez View Post
    Thanks cynic. My first thought about Paula Woodward is that she's gone from following Denver Public Work employees around to shilling for the Ramseys...Good gawd...Not much of a leap...LOL
    Didn't know Woodward worked for Denver Public Works. Clearly it was the Sewage Treatment Facility.

    Has anyone posted this article link here? On the question of Paula Woodward's bias, the last statement attributed to her in this Brennan article says it all:

    [Hope I'm not repeating, sorry if I am.]

    http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boul...ion?source=rss

    JonBenet Ramsey book, 4 years in works, nears publication
    Author is Paula Woodward, longtime investigative specialist for 9News
    By Charlie Brennan Camera Staff Writer

    POSTED: 12/25/2013 02:00:00 PM MST

    Seventeen years ago Thursday, the first news reports started appearing concerning the violent death of a 6-year-old girl in Boulder named JonBenet Ramsey.

    With the case seemingly no closer to a resolution, books on the enduring mystery continue periodically to surface, and orders are being taken now for one that those who have followed the case have been anticipating for several years.

    "Mr. Ramsey, Listen Carefully!: Facts, Fictions, Lies and Legends in the Murder of JonBenet Ramsey" will be published next year in paperback by Kensington Publishing Corp. The author is Paula Woodward, former longtime investigative reporter for 9News.

    [snip]

    'Nobody knows what I think now'

    Woodward, who lives in the Denver area, said the book is being written with John Ramsey's cooperation.

    [snip]

    Woodward acknowledged that she is perceived by some followers of the case as being convinced of all family members' innocence. But she dismissed any preconceptions about her thoughts concerning the mystery.

    "That case was full of misperceptions, and nobody knows what I thought then and after reviewing it for four years, nobody knows what I think now," she said.

    She also said, "This is doing investigative reporting: Here's the best information I can get. Decide for yourself."

    [snip]

    Woodward shared one hoped-for result of her long-awaited publication: "I hope someone sues me for not getting permission to publish their ransom note."
    Perhaps someone should tell Paula Patsy is dead. Since dead people can't sue, guess that leaves someone "else" as the ransom note writer in Paula's theory. Unless Paula believes a different Ramsey wrote it, she pretty much just said she thinks it was an intruder.

    I swear, those Ramsey shills are invariably, inescapably, irrefutably stupid.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  5. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heymom View Post
    At least in Colorado, they have the excuse of having legal pot available.
    Maybe that's how they stand it. At this point, I'm thinking it might be a good idea....

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  6. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase View Post
    [SNIP]
    Perhaps someone should tell Paula Patsy is dead. Since dead people can't sue...
    [SNIP]
    I swear, those Ramsey shills are invariably, inescapably, irrefutably stupid.
    There may be a legal loophole. Perhaps someone that’s dead can sue someone that’s brain dead, given the level playing field?

  7. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynic View Post
    There may be a legal loophole. Perhaps someone that’s dead can sue someone that’s brain dead, given the level playing field?
    Ha ha ha!

    Okay, I'm willing to sue the brain dead (Paula) on behalf of the dead (Patsy). How dare Paula publish Patsy's ransom note without Patsy's permission?!!!

    I mean, REALLY! That ransom note was a small novella! There's copyright infringement, book rights, movie rights, the mini-series, not to mention the video games and twitter account.

    THE RANSOM NOTE WAS PATSY'S MASTERPIECE! And here, Paula is bandying it about like it was written by some itinerant, half-foreign, sort of plural, but mostly singular, non-respecting, fickle faction that can't spell "business" but can spell "attaché" and uses editing carets to insert words into sentences when they're not threatening to behead people! Hallelujah! Praise the S.B.T.C! We're all going to hell on a fast horse, but there's VICTORY in Jesus! WHERE'S THE REST OF THAT BOTTLE OF XANAX?!!!

    If Paula, and the rest of the Ramsey apologists, IDI, and sycophants can't see Patsy in that ransom note, they are living in a world of delusion created by their OWN psychological need to see the Ramseys as innocent. It is dysfunction of the highest order and speaks to the mental, and emotional, aberrations that can be created by the brain to protect itself from the TRUTH.

    Paula needs therapy, not a book contract.

  8. #20

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee View Post
    Ha ha ha!

    Okay, I'm willing to sue the brain dead (Paula) on behalf of the dead (Patsy). How dare Paula publish Patsy's ransom note without Patsy's permission?!!!

    I mean, REALLY! That ransom note was a small novella! There's copyright infringement, book rights, movie rights, the mini-series, not to mention the video games and twitter account.

    THE RANSOM NOTE WAS PATSY'S MASTERPIECE! And here, Paula is bandying it about like it was written by some itinerant, half-foreign, sort of plural, but mostly singular, non-respecting, fickle faction that can't spell "business" but can spell "attaché" and uses editing carets to insert words into sentences when they're not threatening to behead people! Hallelujah! Praise the S.B.T.C! We're all going to hell on a fast horse, but there's VICTORY in Jesus! WHERE'S THE REST OF THAT BOTTLE OF XANAX?!!!

    If Paula, and the rest of the Ramsey apologists, IDI, and sycophants can't see Patsy in that ransom note, they are living in a world of delusion created by their OWN psychological need to see the Ramseys as innocent. It is dysfunction of the highest order and speaks to the mental, and emotional, aberrations that can be created by the brain to protect itself from the TRUTH.

    Paula needs therapy, not a book contract.
    Great post Cherokee!!
    ~~"Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    I came, I saw, I stuck around!~~

  9. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Niner View Post
    Great post Cherokee!!
    Thank you, Niner. If years of ranting about corruption, injustice and IDIots in the Ramsey case were a paying job, I'd be a freakin' millionaire!

  10. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Niner View Post
    Great post Cherokee!!
    Hear, hear! Agreed!

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  11. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee View Post
    Ha ha ha!

    Okay, I'm willing to sue the brain dead (Paula) on behalf of the dead (Patsy). How dare Paula publish Patsy's ransom note without Patsy's permission?!!!

    I mean, REALLY! That ransom note was a small novella! There's copyright infringement, book rights, movie rights, the mini-series, not to mention the video games and twitter account.

    THE RANSOM NOTE WAS PATSY'S MASTERPIECE! And here, Paula is bandying it about like it was written by some itinerant, half-foreign, sort of plural, but mostly singular, non-respecting, fickle faction that can't spell "business" but can spell "attaché" and uses editing carets to insert words into sentences when they're not threatening to behead people! Hallelujah! Praise the S.B.T.C! We're all going to hell on a fast horse, but there's VICTORY in Jesus! WHERE'S THE REST OF THAT BOTTLE OF XANAX?!!!

    If Paula, and the rest of the Ramsey apologists, IDI, and sycophants can't see Patsy in that ransom note, they are living in a world of delusion created by their OWN psychological need to see the Ramseys as innocent. It is dysfunction of the highest order and speaks to the mental, and emotional, aberrations that can be created by the brain to protect itself from the TRUTH.

    Paula needs therapy, not a book contract.
    Dayum! Tell it! Tell it! Keep going and we'll be dancing and speaking in tongues!


    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  12. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee View Post
    Ha ha ha!

    Okay, I'm willing to sue the brain dead (Paula) on behalf of the dead (Patsy). How dare Paula publish Patsy's ransom note without Patsy's permission?!!!

    I mean, REALLY! That ransom note was a small novella! There's copyright infringement, book rights, movie rights, the mini-series, not to mention the video games and twitter account.

    THE RANSOM NOTE WAS PATSY'S MASTERPIECE! And here, Paula is bandying it about like it was written by some itinerant, half-foreign, sort of plural, but mostly singular, non-respecting, fickle faction that can't spell "business" but can spell "attaché" and uses editing carets to insert words into sentences when they're not threatening to behead people! Hallelujah! Praise the S.B.T.C! We're all going to hell on a fast horse, but there's VICTORY in Jesus! WHERE'S THE REST OF THAT BOTTLE OF XANAX?!!!

    If Paula, and the rest of the Ramsey apologists, IDI, and sycophants can't see Patsy in that ransom note, they are living in a world of delusion created by their OWN psychological need to see the Ramseys as innocent. It is dysfunction of the highest order and speaks to the mental, and emotional, aberrations that can be created by the brain to protect itself from the TRUTH.

    Paula needs therapy, not a book contract.
    Well said, as usual.
    May I also add that your “can sue” attitude would make Lin Wood proud.
    Perhaps another session of “Night Court of the Living Dead” is in order?



Similar Threads

  1. Paula Phillips
    By RC in forum Missing Children and AMBER Alerts -Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 26, 2002, 6:51 am, Thu Sep 26 6:51:33 UTC 2002
  2. America's most wanted: intelligent talk shows
    By JR in forum Missing Children and AMBER Alerts -Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 27, 2002, 3:15 pm, Thu Jun 27 15:15:23 UTC 2002
  3. Paula Jones To Box Tonya Harding
    By Nandee in forum Forums for Justice - Crime Forums
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 3, 2002, 10:26 am, Sun Mar 3 10:26:35 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •