Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 70
  1. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,320

    Default

    Wow, OTG, you could be right. I've wondered for years where hir has been, I think of hir from time to time and wondered where hir has been when Kolar's book surfaced, then the grand jury news. Wow, you could be onto something. Loved the greasy-haired apparition, I was dying laughing at your post!
    I despise the Ramseys and this is just my opinion

  2. #50

    Default

    I have found myself wondering about a few of the "new" members who popped up in a certain unnamed forum...

  3. #51

    Default

    I've noticed the trolls showing up at WS, as well, OTG. They are so full of it. But IDI have historically always been as full of it as the Ramseys.

    Birds of a feather: they lie and lie and lie and lie. Out of lies they create their "alternate reality".

    There's just no point in arguing with someone who is determined to avoid the truth.

    I doubt there's anything coming, legally speaking, in this case. It's just not legally feasible, since among the plethora of crimes committed, from the sexual abuse and murder of a child to the obstruction of justice and cover-up, have all passed the statute of limitations, except for murder.

    And nobody is ever going to need more than Patsy Ramsey and her ransom note to create reasonable doubt in this case.

    Of course Team Ramsey will forever be looking for another parade to declare themselves righteous and make some more money.

    Anyone who is really interested in the truth, however, already knows it. The evidence is clear: 3 people in the home who had no alibis, who had motive, and to whom the evidence always leads; the same 3 people who obstructed the investigation and continue to do so to this day.

    I have given it over to the Universe to sort out now.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  4. #52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tawny View Post
    I have found myself wondering about a few of the "new" members who popped up in a certain unnamed forum...
    Sorry to be dense, but I don't get around as much as I used to....

    You're going to have to give me a bigger hint.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  5. #53

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Tawny View Post
    Aw I was really looking forward to the foreign faction suing her for publishing their ransom novella without permission :/
    BWHAAAAA!!!!!!

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  6. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Southern Silicon Valley !!
    Posts
    2,285

    Exclamation

    Tawny, I guess you will have to give me a hint too. I read elsewhere but not a lot and not many places. I have no clue what you are referring to. Help me please!
    "When are we going to get our heads out of the sand and understand that sometimes really nice people who look good on the outside are dastardly on the inside." Wendy Murphy, former prosecutor, MA

  7. #55

    Default

    One of the new people, cherisa, seemed bound and determined to rile up the RDIs and has been unable to do so. The posts and threads keep getting deleted.

    I sometimes wonder if that IPs of that member shouldn't be checked against a couple of other IDIs, but it's probably just paranoia.

  8. #56
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Oh for God's sake--is Miss Thing still playing those forum games? Remember when that Ramsey Super Fan sold all those transcripts to the tabloids? Man with friends like that who needs enemies?

  9. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by otg View Post
    I see the bad moon arising.
    I see trouble on the way.
    I see earthquakes and lightnin'.
    I see bad times today.

    (Credence Clearwater Revival, 1969)
    I don’t know what’s going on, but “something’s afoot.” In the recent history of this case, we’ve seen that BPD would like to talk again to Burke (but he refused), confirmation that the Ramsey GJ did actually vote to indict (dismissed by John as “just more drama”), announcement of a new soon-to-be-released pro-Ramsey (probably) book, then the third public pronouncement that the Whites are not suspects. And then we got word that Woodward’s book is being shelved. What’s happening? It seems like sides are being drawn, and the Ramsey camp is circling the wagons in preparation for something.

    I was thinking about all this, and it occurred to me that the only thing missing is someone from the past who worked so hard to make hirself such an integral part of this case from the very beginning. Strange, I thought, that this person just disappeared so suddenly without so much as a grand exit (to my knowledge). Why have we not heard from this person with all that’s been going on lately?

    And then I was reading on another forum, and I saw it... Like a greasy-haired apparition rising from the murky waters of the swamp -- it appeared! It began posting under its most famous “hat”. Then, just like before, other hats started showing up agreeing, and sometimes claiming the same persona (with an occasional slip-up of forgetting which hat was being worn). Now I’m thinking back on some of the recently registered posters on our “sister site” who initially declared their neutrality, and then “decided” they were IDI. Not unusual in itself, but a lot more having done so recently makes me just a little suspicious considering everything else going on. Does this all portend something ominous?

    Maybe I’m getting too suspicious, maybe I’m looking at windmills, maybe it’s nothing. Maybe I’ve got my ear too close to the ground.

    Justin Playfair (George C. Scott):



    So maybe I’m wrong, but if some kind of “big” news comes out of Boulder soon, remember: You heard it here first.
    I hear hurricanes ablowing.
    I know the end is coming soon.
    I fear rivers over flowing.
    I hear the voice of rage and ruin.

    You have a way with words otg - wonderful! Are you a teacher?

    Thanks for keeping me updated!
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  10. #58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tawny View Post
    One of the new people, cherisa, seemed bound and determined to rile up the RDIs and has been unable to do so. The posts and threads keep getting deleted.

    I sometimes wonder if that IPs of that member shouldn't be checked against a couple of other IDIs, but it's probably just paranoia.
    Ah. Thanks for the clue.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  11. #59

    Default A revised book from Paula Woodward

    Amazon has an advanced notice of another Paula Woodward book titled: We Have Your Daughter: The Unsolved Murder of JonBenét Ramsey Twenty Years Later.

    The advance announcement promotes that she's had unrestricted access to the Rs for 20 years. One doesn't really need any imagination to know who, in her life's 'opus,' is being blamed for the unsolved crime.

  12. #60

    Default

    Paula Woodward's book must be a mess. She thinks the Ramsey Bible was on the nightstand open to Psalm 118. Steve Thomas disabused us of this notion sixteen years ago in JonBenet. He says that the Bible was on the desk open to Psalm 35, the first lines of which contain "SBTC." If the Bible had been in a different place, open to a different psalm, Lin Wood would have hauled Thomas over the coals when he deposed him. He didn't bring up the matter at all so we can assume that Thomas is right.

    Woodward hasn't even read JonBenet. Pathetic.



Similar Threads

  1. Paula Phillips
    By RC in forum Missing Children and AMBER Alerts -Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 26, 2002, 6:51 am, Thu Sep 26 6:51:33 UTC 2002
  2. America's most wanted: intelligent talk shows
    By JR in forum Missing Children and AMBER Alerts -Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 27, 2002, 3:15 pm, Thu Jun 27 15:15:23 UTC 2002
  3. Paula Jones To Box Tonya Harding
    By Nandee in forum Forums for Justice - Crime Forums
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 3, 2002, 10:26 am, Sun Mar 3 10:26:35 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •