Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 17
  1. #1

    Default Wolf vs Ramsey 911 Response Motion

    United States District Court
    Northern District of Georgia
    Atlanta Division

    Robert Christian Wolf, )
    )
    Plaintiff,)
    )
    v.)
    )
    John Bennett Ramsey & )
    Patricia Paugh Ramsey, )
    )
    Defendants.)

    Plaintiff's Response to the City of Boulder's
    Motion for a Protective Order

    The plaintiff Chris Wolf, by his attorneys, response to the City of Boulder's motion for a protective oder as follows:

    The City of Boulder claims that it is involved in an "ongoing investigation in the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. Recently published newspaper reports, however, would seem to contradict this representation in the City's motion papers. The Rocky Mountain News, in two separate February 10, 2003 articles, observed that "there is little outward signs of activity in the probe." (Exhibit A). The City of Boulder has, morevoer, ignored forensic evidence presented to such agencies as the Boulder Police Department and the Boulder District Attorney's Office. (Exhibits B and C).

    The City of Boulder has also allowed former Boulder homicide detective Lou Smit to resign from the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation with "top secret' crime scene photographs and reports, which Smit then subsequently disseminated to the public via network television programs, such as The Today Show. Smit was also allowed to comment on the evidence and its significance to the murder investigation. This was done with the express written approval of the City of Boulder and in direct violation of the confidentiality clause in Smit's employment contract with the Boulder District Attorney.

    The plaintiff would normally not take a postition with respect to the City of Boulder's request for a protective order if it were not for the rank hypocrisy of its motion. As a result, the plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court deny the City of Boulder's application for a protective order.

    Respectfully submitted this 18th Day of February, 2003.

    Evan M. Altman
    Georgia Bar No. 01406
    Law Offices of Evan M. Altman
    6085 Lake Forrest Drive
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328
    (404) 845-0695

    Signature on document is as follows: Evan M. Altman by DH w/express permission

    Exhibit A: (4 pages including cover) Rocky Mountain News article, "DA keeps lid on Ramsey Death Probe" dated February 10, 2003 and Rocky Mountain News article, "City ducks lawsuit over slaying" dated February 10, 2003
    Exhibit B: (26 pages including cover) Exhibit of Letter Combinations and Unique Features
    Exhibit C: (11 pages including cover) Ransom Note vs Patsy Ramsey letters A thru Z

    ================================

    I also have the full .pdf file downloaded here showing all exhibits:

    http://www.acandyrose.com/02182003dh911motion.pdf

    and link listed at the bottom of this web page:

    http://www.acandyrose.com/legaldocuments.htm

    Thank You,
    ACandyRose

    edited to correct typos. ACR

    and to add: Signature on document is as follows: Evan M. Altman by DH w/express permission
    Last edited by ACandyRose; March 16, 2003, 2:33 pm at Sun Mar 16 14:33:36 UTC 2003.
    ACandyRose (aka ACR)

    ACandyRose Timelines:
    Erica Lynn Parsons Case Timeline Index
    http://www.acandyrose.com/erica_parsons_timeline.htm
    JonBenet Ramsey Archive still here after 17 years !!
    http://www.acandyrose.com/s-Flight755-15thStreet.htm
    http://www.acandyrose.com/jonbenetindex.htm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The "Beehive State" It's true. Look it up
    Posts
    5,176

    Default

    Thank you ACR. As usual you are right on top of things for us.

    What do you think will happen?

  3. #3

    Default Do I look like a mind reader? :-)

    I don't know but the exhibits on handwriting examples attached in the .pdf file are extremely interesting.

    I just realized how many typos I made. Sorry about that as I was in a rush. I think you get the idea. :-)

    I went back and made type corrections plus to add that the hand written signature is as follows:

    Evan M. Altman by DH w/express permission

    ACandyRose
    ACandyRose (aka ACR)

    ACandyRose Timelines:
    Erica Lynn Parsons Case Timeline Index
    http://www.acandyrose.com/erica_parsons_timeline.htm
    JonBenet Ramsey Archive still here after 17 years !!
    http://www.acandyrose.com/s-Flight755-15thStreet.htm
    http://www.acandyrose.com/jonbenetindex.htm

  4. #4
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    I agree. How anyone can look at those samples and not know Patsy wrote it is beyond me. This note, it must be stressed, was not found in a ravine in the mountains somewhere--it was found inside a locked house with a dead child and a staged crime scene.

    We needn't make it more complicated than that folks!

  5. #5

    Default Interesting

    The handwriting comparisons are very interesting. And some show quite a bit of similarity for sure. However, as you know, both Fausto Brugnatelli and myself have found some strong similarities with John's printing. Clearly neither Patsy NOR John can be ruled out. But to really accuse either John or Patsy of writing this document, one needs to show comparisons with some sort of control group. If in fact an unbiased expert could pick Patsy's or John's printing out from among a group of similar samples by different people using a similar printing style, then that would be truly compelling evidence that might have some impact in a trial. Without such control, we can only speculate. There are indeed a great many people with similar styles of printing, possibly millions in fact.

    The bottom line for me is that I can see no REASON for Patsy to have written a self-incriminating "ransom" note.

  6. #6
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Self incriminating? Yeah in hindsight! People write fake ransom notes like this to stage crime scenes all the time. What makes Patsy Ramsey incapable of making the same mistake hundreds of others have done?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sitting in front of my PC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default john's handwriting experts

    as i understand it, john hired his own handwriting experts, and NONE of THEM....thought John had written the note.

    correct me if i am wrong.

    purr

  8. #8
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    That's right, Purr.

  9. #9

    Default Thanks again, purr

    (I don't think BobC gets it. ;-) But that's OK, there's a LOT that sails over this guy's head!)

    John hired HIS OWN experts to "rule" him "out." For some reason a couple of other "experts" bought it. But in actual fact only a very few forensic doc people have EVER actually examined John's exemplars. These have, in fact, been kept a deep dark secret from the public. And there was NEVER any effort to locate historic exemplars from John as there was from Patsy. There was certainly no warrant ever issued for his exemplars.

    As far as the one exemplar from John that HAS been made public, (the deposition that's been out there for so long) that HAS been confirmed, by Patsy's sister Pam, as indeed John's printing. What she has called his "chicken scratch." A phrase that could be used to describe the note itself. (Patsy's style is much more flowing and even.) Patsy did NOT write that for him, which should be obvious to anyone comparing her (much neater) printing to this document.

    Bob, I don't know how to break this to you, but you are NOT much of sleuth (though you can be amusing). I suppose there could be many people who have penned phoney ransom notes to cover their :(:(:(, but NOT under circumstances remotely resembling the Ramsey note. If the body had been found outside the house, then yes maybe the note might have worked for her. But SHE is the one who called the police and because of that call the body was found IN the house. If you are dead set on Patsy as your favorite perp, I suppose that won't matter. To everyone else it will -- and HAS. Patsy did NOT write that note. And if you won't take my word for it, then just look at the history of this case. EVERY effort to implicate Patsy has gone nowhere. This is NOT an issue anymore, except for a few diehards. Patsy dunnit is DEAD. Find another suspect!

  10. #10
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    uhhhh Doc. You poor, goofy thing. Patsy Ramsey was this close to being arrested several times. As another poster here stated ever so accurately several times, this case was solved long ago --it's just not ready for court. The feds know the deal, but don't need the hastle of going public with the info.

    Patsy wrote the ransom note. It is the opinion of every hand-writing expert consulted thus far. People who do hand-writing anaylsis for the military and the feds, you know, for a living. Now, just because you and Jameson don't think Patsy wrote it, doesn't cancel out their opinion.

    Now regarding my sluething ability--yes, I'm sorry to tell you but my abilities are so refined, so incredibly vast, that a mind such as yours must block it all out, lest you go mad. You examining my reasoning faculties would be like a fruit fly gawking at the Big Bang --the very beginning of existance, you poor thing. Please don't try--I can't take resonsibility for the trauma you may experience. The majesty of my worldview should only be admired in shock and awe from afar, preferably with protective lenses.

  11. #11
    RiverRat's Avatar
    RiverRat is offline FFJ Sr. Member Extraordinaire (Pictured at Left is Patsy Ramsey)
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NoneYa Beessness
    Posts
    7,824

    Cool You two

    Do what you do in style!

    I still have to side more with Bob for one reason. Being the murderer is the only that justifies Patsy's post homicide unusual behaviour.

    RR

  12. #12
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    I just look at what the experts say. Discussion is one thing and that's cool, but when people start thinking they know more about these areas than the CBI and FBI, well, I think that says it all.



Similar Threads

  1. John Ramsey Deposition - Wolf Case - December 12, 2001
    By Moab in forum Transcripts: Ramsey murder case
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 15, 2010, 3:41 pm, Wed Sep 15 15:41:19 UTC 2010
  2. Patsy Ramsey Deposition - Wolf Case - December 11, 2001
    By Moab in forum Transcripts: Ramsey murder case
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 15, 2010, 3:38 pm, Wed Sep 15 15:38:20 UTC 2010
  3. MOTION for NEW TRIAL: Judge to Rule on 3-14-05
    By DocUMento in forum Laci Denise Rocha Peterson
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 15, 2005, 9:09 pm, Tue Mar 15 21:09:51 UTC 2005
  4. Wolf v. Ramsey Updates
    By LurkerXIV in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: January 21, 2002, 4:01 pm, Mon Jan 21 16:01:01 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •