Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 15 of 15
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Hornetsville, NY

    Default So do I, Dun

    though the Ramsey self-appointed spokesperson at the bog will deny this ever happened. How she thinks she can speak with authority on this issue is beyond me - she wasn't there - but she will say her sources said it never happened. Yeah right.

    Steve Thomas didn't just pull this information out of thin air - someone who was there and who spoke to JB told him about this incident. I would take ST's word and just about anyone else's word on this above the snake at the snake pit.

    But, I digress. It totally made sense to me - a little girl sitting on the stairs feeling bad because she didn't feel pretty. Not that she didn't look pretty, but that she didn't *feel* pretty - it jives with this statement in the autopsy: "All of the sections contain vascular congestion and focal interstital chronic inflammation." The term "chronic" is not open to interpretation, according to Dr. Cyril Wecht, and any intelligent person knows that. Chronic means the inflammation was at least 48 to 72 hours old. The inflammation was not fresh, something had caused it on December 22 or 23, or perhaps even earlier, according to Wecht.

    Now the bozos at the swamp can spin this to mean she was inflamed due to bubble bath or urine or poor hygiene, but don't be swayed by that. It is pure bunk. The focal interstitial chronic inflammation - break it down - "focal" means "in some spots," "interstitial" means in the walls of the vagina. How would bubble bath or urine or poor hygiene affect only some spots and not others? Don't buy into jameson's ridiculous theories. It is misinformation to the max.

    Consider this from the autopsy - "Acute inflammatory infiltrate is not seen." Inflammatory infiltrate would be white blood cells, the ones that would rush to the scene to defend the body. They were not found at this injured location on the vaginal wall because JB had died before there was time for them to arrive. That would take an hour or so from the moment of the injury, and her body's vital reactions had ceased before then - along with her life.

    As Dr. Wecht says, "She died too soon, in more ways than one."

    Now, anyone can spin this whatever way she wishes, but scientific fact is scientific fact, and all the spinning in the world isn't going to change that. Wecht is under the bus with many other experts who have spoken out about this case and it hasn't been in the Ramseys' favor, and there are other experts who agree with him and some who are noncommittal and some who do not agree with him, but he makes sense to me on this issue. That does not mean that everything he says makes sense to me, but he's the expert, not I. I know what chronic means, and I know what acute means, and I know he is right about this. The Code six wingnut at the swamp is, to put it nicely, "simply wrong, *grin*.
    Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
    the philosophy which does not laugh,
    and the greatness which does not bow before children.

    ---Kahlil Gibran---

  2. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Los Angeles

    Default how lucky for jams

    If she didn't raid the other fourms she would have nothing to talk to herself about
    She posted this:

    19 . "log grabber"
    Posted by jameson on Jan-07-02 at 09:09 PM (EST)

    Don't know who first found this photo, but it seems to me that the thing I called a poker is a fiteplace tool.

    .... Hey Jams.... How did you copy it if you didn't know who found it? We both know you found my post on WS.. Image Basement room thread, post #65!!
    When you defend the indefensible, you make the Ramsey's look even more guilty.....

  3. #15


    I don't think that Patsy is/was afraid of John physically, but I do believe that she was/is afraid of losing what is left of their reputation (which is actually very little considering the majority of the public think they murdered their daughter). I have no doubt that they each have their own reasons for covering up the truth of what really happened that night.

    If John was molesting JonBenét, and Patsy walked in on it and accidently whacked her while aiming for John, then that would mean admitting to some incredibly embarrassing and shameful activities; not to mention Life in prison. For an "Uppity Southern Gal" like Patsy, having incest confirmed would be worse than the death of her "prized" little girl.

    If what was allegedly reported by Linda Hoffman Pugh is true, that she found where JonBenét had defecated in her bed and that it was 'the size of a grapefruit', I'm pondering how such a large amount got out of her clothing; OR did she not have on underwear, and if so, why not?

Similar Threads

  1. The RST's View of John and Patsy Ramsey
    By icedtea4me in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: August 11, 2006, 9:44 am, Fri Aug 11 9:44:49 UTC 2006
  2. Did John or Patsy fail a polygraph?
    By DocG in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 14, 2005, 5:39 pm, Thu Apr 14 17:39:44 UTC 2005
  3. CBS talking to Patsy & John
    By JC in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: December 24, 2004, 11:53 pm, Fri Dec 24 23:53:35 UTC 2004
  4. Patsy we know never did... but what about John...
    By Sprocket in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: February 14, 2004, 4:52 am, Sat Feb 14 4:52:12 UTC 2004
  5. An Open Letter To John And Patsy
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: June 27, 2002, 1:00 pm, Thu Jun 27 13:00:34 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts