Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default Here's the question you all should ask

    I just love the dog and pony show that the RST have now come up with. The RST (now including Candy) are just having a field day with the distraction of Tricia and Gigax' name being put out there.
    They are saying that because of this and that, Gigax' right to privacy, Gigax' right to have his name private, Gigax now needs a lawyer, Gigax shouldn't have "been bothered"......yadda, yadda

    Even Jameson spews that this is good because now other people can "come forward and clear their name"

    Hello?

    Haven't we heard a thousand times that one doesn't have to prove themselves innocent? The ramseys don't have to clear their name because they are not suspects? The ramseys are INNOCENT until proven guilty? For crying out loud, THE RAMSEYS WOULDN'T EVEN COME FORWARD AND "CLEAR THEIR NAME". The Ramseys didn't trust the authorities and now they pick on those who are either dead or have criminal records and a tainted past, who are not at all wealthy and THEY WANT THEM TO GO TO THE SAME AUTHORITIES TO CLEAR THEMSELVES?????????????

    Total strangers should "come forward and clear their name?????"

    Now for the question you should be asking:

    Tricia "outed" Gigax' name.

    Why was there a name to out in the first place?????????????????

    I'd like Tracey to answer that.

    It seems Tracey doesn't want too many copies floating around the United States. Well duh, of course not, people will see what a farce and a slap in the face to the "investigation" here by suggesting such drivel

    Tracy will be "outed" as the blood sucker that he is.

    Now the National Examiner is naming Helgoth (you know, the man Jameson "outed") and his "accomplice" as the killers.

    Yeah, but the RST and Lou Smit and the Ramseys can continue to distract the facts with the focus on Gigax' name made public.

    Doesn't anyone see what is happening???? This is the RST's dream! All Tricia talk, all Gigax talk and NO Ramsey talk.

    Wake up guys!
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,617

    Default

    R S T=



    RAMSEY SCUM TEAM

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Driver
    R S T=



    RAMSEY SCUM TEAM

    I bet you Candy thought of that first LOL
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Great post, Barbara!
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle_1
    Great post, Barbara!

    Thanks Elle,

    I try to always read "between the lines" of what is going on and while sometimes it takes a little time, I eventually get there and then I start on my own rants.

    Unfortunately, it is difficult most times not to get caught up in the banter myself as it is, (juvenile or not) very entertaining at times. Hey, we all need the laughs.

    But I try to keep up with the "distractions" that get more and more blatant as time goes on.
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  6. #6

    Angry

    Barbara,

    That is an excellent post! I can't believe the audacity (sp) of some people. Who else needs to come forward and clear their name and prove their innocence? Who needs to be thrown under the bus?

    The Ramsey's have never cooperated fully with LE. I don't care what they say about how they cooperated. Heck, they cooperated more when Pasta Jay took the bat after those reporters and when their house in Atlanta was broken into by that nice gentleman burglar. In both of those instances, they couldn't wait to get to the police station to cooperate. Patsy for Pasta Jay, and both John and Patsy for the gentleman burglar. Something is very wrong with that picture IMO.
    Last edited by Tez; July 16, 2004, 6:47 pm at Fri Jul 16 18:47:23 UTC 2004. Reason: To fix my boo-boo.

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbara
    Thanks Elle,

    I try to always read "between the lines" of what is going on and while sometimes it takes a little time, I eventually get there and then I start on my own rants.

    Unfortunately, it is difficult most times not to get caught up in the banter myself as it is, (juvenile or not) very entertaining at times. Hey, we all need the laughs.

    But I try to keep up with the "distractions" that get more and more blatant as time goes on.
    Like many of the younger ones on this board, you are feisty and call it like it is! I'm feisty myself, Barbara, although a Senior! I think we need to be like this when coming up against a situation like the one we've got on hand now.
    I'm fed up with the whole damn lot of them myself. I could line them all up in a row and throw rotten tomatoes at the whole bunch.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Tez wrote:

    The Ramsey's have never cooperated fully with LE. I don't care what they say about how they cooperated. Heck, they cooperated more when Pasta Jay took the bat after those reporters and when their house in Atlanta was broken into by that nice gentleman burglar. In both of those instances, they couldn't wait to get to the police station to cooperate. Patsy for Pasta Jay, and both John and Patsy for the gentleman burglar. Something is very wrong with that picture IMO.


    You're darn right Tez! They did cooperate more with the police about these incidents. Something "far" wrong with this scene!
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    See what happens when you don't wade in the swamp? You miss gems like this.

    Jameson
    "RE: Responding to BORG"
    In response to message #0

    Barbara write something I want to respond to.
    Barbara:
    Why isn't anyone asking why and HOW Tracey was able to get hold of this information and make a f***ing documentary all about this guy?
    He got to know where he lived, who his family is, what he does, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME

    His records, his date of birth, his friends, and everything else about this case and this man's whole life story. Tracey is nothing but a journalist, and a two bit journalist at that!

    WHY ISN'T ANYONE INQUIRING WHO GAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION TO TRACEY AND IF IT IS SUPPOSEDLY "LEGITIMATE" INFORMATION, WHY DOES TRACEY HAVE IT????

    WHY WAS TRACEY GIVEN ALL THIS INFORMATION AND ALLOWED TO MAKE A TELEVISION SHOW ABOUT HIM, MAKE A PROFIT, MAKE A NAME FOR HIMSELF?????

    AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO BELIEVE JAMESON THAT SHE HAD ALL THIS INFORMATION, I WOULD ASK: WHY DOES AN ORDINARY CITIZEN HAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION???????????????

    SHE IS NOTHING BUT A CITIZEN. WHY WAS SHE GIVEN ANY INFORMATION AT ALL, ESPECIALLY INFORMATION THAT IS SO "CRITICAL" AND "IMPORTANT"?????

    WHO IS LEAKING THIS INFO TO AN ORDINARY CITIZEN?

    WHY ISN'T ANYONE ASKING THESE QUESTIONS BESIDES ME???????


    Tracey spoke to investigators who decided to follow the Helgoth lead. THEY spoke to Kenady and other people who knew Helgoth and they found some interesting things. They spoke to Tracey.
    I guess they are still being paid rather well by the RST

    Tracey took what they told him and went out on his own a bit - - he spoke to people - interviewed people.
    A bit??????????????? Apparently, he interviewed the wrong people

    If you put the time into it, people will talk and others will learn things.
    Tracey has shown us that if you put in even less time, you can fill in the blanks with misinformation, but time is money after all. Be damned with accuracy!

    And people will share.
    That's why "professional journalists" are supposed to check the FACTS before all that sharing is touted as "information"

    People who spoke to Tracey were also speaking to people like Rita Johnson - and to me.
    Ah, the three "journalists". Is it any wonder the information is bogus?

    I have never posted about all I do in this investigation but I have always been in touch with a number of people who are related to this case in one way or another. That is no secret. People talk to me. No secret.
    Do us all a favor and KEEP IT SECRET. There are already too many people making it up as they go along

    Sometimes I find out something that seems unimportant then months or years later someone says something that - - in itself is unimportant but put with the older file seems important. When that happens I may talk to an investigator about it.
    Sure you do.

    It is what I do - - no secret, but not public.
    As Martha would say "It's a GOOD THING"

    My sources, and Tracey's sources, any journalist's sources, any investigator's sources, will forever be protected if they want to be anonymous. That is also how it works.
    Let me reiterate: There are never supposed to be "sources" in an (in your words) "ongoing, active investigation". If there are, then it is illegal as well as inaccurate it seems. Lou Smit has ruined his reputation by revealing these things to ordinary citizens

    You don't burn your source - ever.
    Unless you can get $40,000 and then some
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default Misleading the British Public

    What Tracey's documentary said about the investigators:-

    A completely new team of investigators has recently uncovered dramatic new facts about the murder.
    DA Mary Keenan took the case away from local police and called Lou Smit back to lead a new investigation.
    During the past year, the new investigation set up by the DAs office has uncovered dramatic facts about the killing that will shock America and which identify an entirely new prime suspect.
    After ITV reported on the Ramsey murder, Lou Smit, the detective who did most to clear the parents, was called back by the Boulder District Attorney to lead a new investigation. Because of this, he is bound by the confidentiality of her office and no longer able to talk to us. But the Boulder DAs office is neither equipped nor funded to carry out major investigations. So it has also sought the help of private detectives once employed by the Ramseys to hunt the killer. These investigators have been involved from the beginning. Although now unpaid volunteers because of the DAs limited resources, they are an important part of the new investigation and the are free to talk.
    I think that it appears in the documentary as though Augustin, Gray & co are working on the official investigation with full access to the Ramsey file. Reading between the lines, I think they have perhaps been contracted to do some work for the DA on the investigation and are using this as a ticket to qassociate themselves with the investigation. JMO.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  11. #11

    Default

    Lou Smit "was called back to lead" the investigation ???

    I thought Tom Bennett was in charge and Lou was a "consultant."

  12. #12

    Default

    After ITV reported on the Ramsey murder, Lou Smit, the detective who did most to clear the parents, was called back by the Boulder District Attorney to lead a new investigation.
    Hello? The BDA "called Lou back"? The BDA has said all along Loose Mitts was a "consultant" on the case. When was he let go in order to ever be "called back?" And his agenda? To clear the parents. Why would an impartial district attorney purposely do that? Because (1) the BDA is not impartial and (2) the BDA's agenda is to clear the parents. How many more times and in how many more ways does Keenan have to spell it out? Whatever happened to Pease and the FFJ Petition effort? As long as the case remains in the BDA's care, custody and control, the public will continue to be subjected to bogus intruder theories generated by Smit libeling innocent people. This Gigax fiasco, if there ever was one, should be the straw to break the BDA camel's back.



Similar Threads

  1. The DNA Question
    By Ginja in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: March 22, 2008, 8:23 pm, Sat Mar 22 20:23:54 UTC 2008
  2. DNA question
    By Karen in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: March 7, 2005, 4:07 pm, Mon Mar 7 16:07:30 UTC 2005
  3. Another question or two
    By Barbara in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 16, 2004, 7:18 am, Fri Jul 16 7:18:57 UTC 2004
  4. Question of the day...
    By "J_R" in forum Laci Denise Rocha Peterson
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 7, 2004, 10:35 am, Wed Jul 7 10:35:19 UTC 2004
  5. A Question..
    By ravens_tears in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: September 2, 2003, 6:39 pm, Tue Sep 2 18:39:10 UTC 2003

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •