Results 61 to 72 of 79
Thread: Jeff Garfield Wants Our Help ...
-
July 30, 2004, 4:00 pm, Fri Jul 30 16:00:50 UTC 2004 #61
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 4,288
Originally Posted by Jayelles
-
July 30, 2004, 4:08 pm, Fri Jul 30 16:08:50 UTC 2004 #62
Awwwww, i'mon, I mean c'mon...here...have a piece of candy.. sorry, it's the cheap hard kind, but it's all I have to offer at present. :sonar:
:freecs:
-
July 30, 2004, 4:40 pm, Fri Jul 30 16:40:07 UTC 2004 #63
Originally Posted by Driver
This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission
-
July 30, 2004, 5:43 pm, Fri Jul 30 17:43:35 UTC 2004 #64
-
July 30, 2004, 6:12 pm, Fri Jul 30 18:12:47 UTC 2004 #65
Originally Posted by Cherokee
It's probably too late to get justice for JonBenét. Maybe it always was. But knowing where things went wrong is the first step to not going there again. **-- Alan Prendergast-Dec 21, 2006--**
______________________
Bring all our Missing Home www.usearchut.org
Prayers for our military who are protecting our freedom.
-
July 30, 2004, 8:34 pm, Fri Jul 30 20:34:45 UTC 2004 #66
Information 2004, I appreciate your information and was wondering about the Democrat that was running.
We are not all saying John or Patsy Ramsey is guilty of murder.
What we are saying is John Ramsey in particular, is guilty of not following through on his promises. For example, his promises to advocate protection for our most precious resource, our children. He promised to do so in his book and on public tv appearances. He did nothing. The public records prove this.
This is important for someone running for public office, isn't it? How many people in District 105 have ever looked at the public documents of the JonBenet Ramsey Foundation to see what a fraud this was?
-
July 30, 2004, 10:12 pm, Fri Jul 30 22:12:13 UTC 2004 #67
If the 105th elects him or not, mismanagement of public funds, as documented by public and empirical evidence, is a disgrace to the memory of his child. This in reference to the foundation monies, and the "contribution" which was spurred out of a nonexistent financial entity at the bequest of the public pressure which was exerted upon the Ramsesses (sort of like "teefesses", or "breastesses").
We don't put up with suchwithin polite society here in da hood!
It's all just my opinion. They're like noses-everybody has one.
____________________________________________
"Personally, I think lawyers who immerse themselves in themselves are disturbed individuals who need to get a life, and are to be both prayed for and pitied." -quote from The HyperScrubulator, May 25th 2004
____________________________________________
I eat noobs for breakfast, with a side of nails.
-
July 31, 2004, 7:31 am, Sat Jul 31 7:31:28 UTC 2004 #68
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 2,096
Sabrina is right Information 2004...if John can't handle a simple Charity or website devoted to his daughter, what makes the voters think he can handle the complications of a political office? One that demands REAL ACTION and not a verbal vomit of promises?
-
July 31, 2004, 9:26 am, Sat Jul 31 9:26:43 UTC 2004 #69
Well, God didn't put me on this earth to please the voters of Michigan or anyone else. Frankly speaking, as I said before, if the Michigan voters can't, or won't, make the effort to learn all they can about John and Patsy Ramsey, and they vote for him, then they deserve what they voted for, if he wins. All the Candy in the world won't change that.
It's interesting, though, that Information chooses to speak for all the voters in her district, just like someone else I know. I don't know why voters would be so annoyed to learn the truth about a candidate running for office in their district. Sounds personal, to me.
What does intestigative mean?
Ramsey's a joke.Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
the philosophy which does not laugh,
and the greatness which does not bow before children.
---Kahlil Gibran---
-
July 31, 2004, 9:42 am, Sat Jul 31 9:42:24 UTC 2004 #70
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
Take your pick Rainsong or Jameson? Our clowns ...er ...um ... clones!
elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
July 31, 2004, 9:44 am, Sat Jul 31 9:44:36 UTC 2004 #71
Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 2,154
Ok - here’s something for the voters of Michigan to consider:
Facts to consider: The Ramseys are not opposed to suing an entire city if they don’t get their way.
City ducks lawsuit over slaying
By Charlie Brennan, Rocky Mountain News
February 10, 2003
BOULDER - The decision by Boulder District Attorney Mary Keenan to take control of the JonBenet Ramsey case might not solve a crime, but it spared the city a major lawsuit.
Source: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...734299,00.htmlRamseys aren't focus of inquiry, letter hints
But Boulder DA says probe 'will not exempt' the couple
By Owen S. Good, Rocky Mountain News
December 24, 2002
jump
Keenan, on taking office, vowed not to become a "talking head" for the case. Last year, she said she was glad to have been minimally involved with the case during her career as a deputy prosecutor.
Granting Wood's request for an investigation that doesn't involve Boulder police also conflicts with previous stances. In June 2001, Wood made the same demand in a letter to Keenan.
She refused to respond then, saying, "I am not going to be baited by the Ramseys' attorney."
Wood said he believes Keenan is confronting the case out of professional commitment, not because he has threatened to file a civil rights suit against the Boulder police for what he called a campaign to smear the Ramseys and sweat out a confession.
"If it is believed this was a deal for Mary Keenan to take the investigation and cut a deal with Lin Wood to avoid being sued, it just didn't happen," Wood said. "I say that even though I made it very clear to Mary Keenan that we would be willing to forgo the lawsuit if she transferred the case."
Source: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...629708,00.html
But Boulder DA says probe 'will not exempt' the couple
By Owen S. Good, Rocky Mountain News
December 24, 2002
A letter from Boulder District Attorney Mary Keenan to the lawyer for John and Patsy Ramsey strongly implies that a renewed investigation into the death of their daughter will not focus on them as suspects.
Keenan, in a Dec. 20 letter to L. Lin Wood of Atlanta, said that "the Boulder Police Department has done an exhaustive and thorough investigation of the Ramseys as potential suspects" in the Dec. 26, 1996, slaying of their 6-year-old daughter, JonBenet.
That investigation effectively ended in October 1999, when a grand jury refused to return an indictment against either parent.
Keenan's letter does not disclose any opinion about the Ramseys' innocence or guilt and says the new investigation"will not exempt the Ramseys."
Source: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...629708,00.htmlHunter: We're not quitting
By Karen Auge
Denver Post Staff Writer
Oct. 15, 1999 - BOULDER - John and Patsy Ramsey are still under that umbrella of suspicion.
In three separate news conferences Thursday afternoon, key figures in the Ramsey case admitted mistakes were made in the investigation, pledged to catch the killer and entertained the idea of having a special prosecutor pick up the case.
Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter and Police Chief Mark Beckner both stressed that efforts to find JonBenet Ramsey's killer didn't end Wednesday with the grand jury investigation - and said the grand jury's 13-month probe did not change the status of JonBeneÚt Ramsey's parents.
"We have not excluded the Ramseys,'' Hunter said.
Source: http://uss001.infi.net/denver/post/news/jon101599.htm
-
July 31, 2004, 10:10 am, Sat Jul 31 10:10:17 UTC 2004 #72
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
Rocky Mountain News - December 4, 2002
Wood said he believes Keenan is confronting the case out of professional commitment, not because he has threatened to file a civil rights suit against the Boulder police for what he called a campaign to smear the Ramseys and sweat out a confession.
"If it is believed this was a deal for Mary Keenan to take the investigation and cut a deal with Lin Wood to avoid being sued, it just didn't happen," Wood said. "I say that even though I made it very clear to Mary Keenan that we would be willing to forgo the lawsuit if she transferred the case."
Aye, right Woody, you're a rotten liar!
Thanks for posting these, Little! It's good to go over these LYING LAWYER'S THREATS to D.A. MARY KEENAN.elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
Similar Threads
-
Jeff Shapiro: Patsy Did It, Hunter Agreed She Was Only Logical Suspect, Lacy Wrong!
By Cherokee in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 23Last Post: January 16, 2012, 1:00 am, Mon Jan 16 1:00:15 UTC 2012 -
Take JonBenet Case Out Of Limbo/Jeff Shapiro
By Elle_1 in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 14Last Post: August 2, 2006, 12:31 pm, Wed Aug 2 12:31:40 UTC 2006 -
Jeff Garfield/Candidate
By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 5Last Post: July 7, 2004, 6:33 am, Wed Jul 7 6:33:27 UTC 2004 -
Jeff Shapiro Reviews Intruder Theories
By LurkerXIV in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 10Last Post: January 7, 2002, 4:57 pm, Mon Jan 7 16:57:11 UTC 2002