Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 50
  1. #1
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,411

    Default People Magazine

    JonBenet Mystery Unsolved After 8 Years

    Friday Dec 17, 2004 8:00am EST
    By Stephen M. Silverman

    This Christmas will mark the eighth anniversary of the death of 6-year-old JonBenet Ramsey in her parents' Boulder, Colo., home, in a case that captured the nation's curiosity and has yet to be solved.

    And the story is far from over. On Saturday, CBS's 48 Hourswill focus a report on Colorado University at Boulder professor Michael Tracey, who's tracked the case for two years and believes that, even though some trails may have gone cold... (snip)

    **********

    No wonder no one trusts the mainstream media anymore. They lie like rugs.
    One borrows falsehoods from the next, and they spread their shoddy wares out all over the airwaves and newsstands. They never bother to check facts--they'd rather repeat an easy lie.

    Yes, Virginia, JonBenet was killed by an intruder. It must be true--People Magazine and CNN say it is so.

  3. #3

    Default

    we all think the rams are guilty,but no matter who is I hope the killer is found out. It is time to put this case to bed. JBR deserves that. If it is someone else and DNA can prove that let the long arm of the law smack the sh$t out of them. Death?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    In a World With Too Much Crime
    Posts
    7,830

    Default

    Well I'll bet the non-Ramsey DNA under JBR's nails and the DNA from the other case don't match...anyone want to take that bet?
    It's probably too late to get justice for JonBenét. Maybe it always was. But knowing where things went wrong is the first step to not going there again. **-- Alan Prendergast-Dec 21, 2006--**

    ______________________
    Bring all our Missing Home www.usearchut.org
    Prayers for our military who are protecting our freedom.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moab
    Well I'll bet the non-Ramsey DNA under JBR's nails and the DNA from the other case don't match...anyone want to take that bet?
    I hope it does to end the case . Altho the Rams will then be open to sue everyone and thier mother, Isn't that thier emo?

  6. #6

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Moab
    Well I'll bet the non-Ramsey DNA under JBR's nails and the DNA from the other case don't match...anyone want to take that bet?
    Moab, we all know it's not going to match. I guess if People Magazine says so, we should believe it though, right? I think I'll take the National Enquirer or The Globe any day over People and CNN at this point.

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The Lone Star State
    Posts
    827

    Default steamed

    It just makes me madder than a wet hen!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The "Beehive State" It's true. Look it up
    Posts
    5,176

    Default

    Sabreena and I were talking last night.

    Isn't this interesting that all of this "The parents are innocent" crap is coming out right before the judge in the Fox suit decides summary judgement?

    Think about it.
    tgrif@xmission.com
    FFJ C/O Tricia Griffith
    6300 N Sage Wood Drive
    Suite H #214
    Park City UT
    84098




    I am unaware of anyone who's profited from exploiting the Ramsey murder over a longer period of time, with a greater disregard for the principles of accuracy and fairness, than the production team of Mills and Tracey.They truly do inhabit a different moral universe from real journalists. It's the difference between journalism and propaganda.
    Alan Prendergast,reporter for Westword

  9. #9

    Default

    Well, the Rs are nothing if not well-connected, well-organized, and well-funded. Not just another pretty face, eh?

    Little

  10. #10

    Default

    Of course all this media attention and the "sudden" revelations brought by Tracey's "final" documentary are being aired right before the hearing on Fox's motion to dismiss (Monday, 12/20). But what it tells us is that Lin Wood needs all this extra hoopla because his argument against that motion is extremely weak at best and he knows it. If he had viable claims (the original and amended complaints list them), he would have the confidence in their merit to proceed. It amazes me that LW, the RST and Tracey all complain loudly when the media is against them, but they have never had any qualms about using the media to spin this kind of chit intentionally to create influence when it suits their purposes. Two-faced hypocrits doesn't begin to describe them.

    Once again, as in 2000, Lin Wood attempts to make this case all about the mystery DNA:

    From CBS website:

    "An investigator at Denver's police crime lab for forensics says DNA found at the Ramsey murder scene came from a male who was not associated with the case, thus ruling out family members as well as a convicted sex offender in Boulder who had been mentioned as a suspect.

    What we found was that there were specific DNA samples that pointed to somebody other than the Ramseys.

    48 Hours reports that Greg LaBerge, of Denver's police crime lab for forensics, says he was 'able to develop a genetic profile that came from a male that was not associated with the case.'"


    Notice how they conveniently forget to include the remainder of Greg LaBerge's comments:

    From Documentary Transcript as Posted at FFJ:

    Narrator: "When the DA’s office took over, they gave priority to enhancing the DNA until it identified the killer. His DNA has now been put into CODIS, America’s combined DNA index. It is the first big breakthrough in the case but it has not yet thrown up a match and the forensic scientist responsible urges caution."

    Greg Laberge: "I think it would be wrong for them to focus just solely on the DNA because the DNA (as important an aspect as it is), it is not the sum total of the investigation. You may never get a hit. Because the suspect may never have committed a crime that qualified him to be in the database or he’s just not been caught yet."

    The truth is that CODIS not only contains DNA samples for matching with adjudicated criminals, it also contains DNA samples from many other crime scenes all over the country that haven't been closed as solved or with arrests. Yet, the mystery DNA from the Ramsey case matches none of those millions of samples.

    "This guy called her by name, so they think he targeted her," Moriarty said Friday on The Early Show. "Also, he hid out in the house. He didn't steal anything. He was there to molest her and that's exactly what the Ramseys say happened in their case."

    The Ramseys have never admitted that their daughter was sexually assaulted until they got ahold of the autopsy report and read Meyers' findings. It was only then that Lou Smit began explaining away the forensic evidence as committed by a wandering homicidal pedophile whose name and ID have changed more often than his underwear. How convenient now to be associating their daughter's murder with this case to divert suspicion.

    They also never acknowledge that the TWO favorite perps being promoted by the Hole-in-the-Head gang lead by Gray, i.e., Helgoth and Gigax, have solid alibis that more than clear them in both cases. Helgoth's DNA was indeed tested for use in the Ramsey case and it did not match. He was already dead and gone for at least a year when Amy was assaulted. Gigax wasn't even in the state of Colorado when both cases occurred and has a solid firsthand witness alibi to corroborate that truth.

    And what's with the "boot prints?" First it was a sole pair of Hi-Tecs that the gang tried to convince us belonged to Helgoth because they were supposedly found at Helgoth's death scene. Now there are TWO sets of boot prints??? And if these perps dress up in black like Ninjas as you claim, what's with completing the ensemble with Hi-Tecs? Why not black tennies or something more suitable for sneaking, running and not leaving ANY prints? Ninjas in hiking boots, yeah right! Sure hope Jet Li is reading here; he could use a few pointers from Smit.

    Yet LW continues to spin this story naming innocent and even dead people, or unidentified wandering burglars (who don't "burgle" if their objective is molestation) with also morphing agendas as if it's true. So which are they Smit, burglars or molesters or both? But how could they be burglars if they don't steal anything?

    Let's just forget that fibers matching Patsy's sweater jacket were identified as littered all over her dead child's body and John's sweater fibers were found in those same panties. Are we to believe that this wandering homicidal pedophile sometimes burglar sometimes just molester who left his mystery DNA on those panties waited until both John and Patsy had removed those articles of clothing that night and fell asleep, then dressed up in John's sweater with Patsy's jacket to commit his or their dastardly deeds? And that he or they just used a housekey copy to gain access too because "some" of these perps allegedly worked at the Ramsey house previously (shades of Elizabeth Smart case)?

    Just how far are our imaginations supposed to stretch to exhonerate two parents who remain the only primary suspects in this case?

    And never mind that Mary Keenan herself spoke publicly defaming this "new" evidence and "big break" in the case as old news that the BDA aren't even actively working. And never mind that Tom Bennett gave a direct statement to Tricia of FFJ that the BDA is not "looking for" Mr. Gigax or even interested in him as a possible lead in the Ramsey case.

    How utterly irresponsible for these media folks to run with this kind of half-truth and lies. I do hope Fox attorneys and Mr. Gigax are documenting all of this carefully for future use.

  11. #11

    Default

    Looks like the only "burglar" Smit can identify is Kenady, who is clearly on the Ramsey payroll.

    Suspect facing burglary charges

    By Christopher Anderson
    Daily Camera Staff Writer, Boulder
    October 25, 2000

    A Lafayette man charged with burglary and theft of a Boulder County home told sheriff's deputies he was investigating the unsolved 1996 JonBenét Ramsey homicide.

    The suspect in the case is John Edward Kenady, 47, the same person who this summer handed over a pair of Hi-Tec boots to private investigators working for John and Patsy Ramsey.

    Boulder police are testing the boots at the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, but do not think they are related to the case. [The DNA didn't match, and neither did the boots. Yet both are still up the Ramsey flagpole to slander/libel innocent people while the RST continues to claim all evidence presented in the Helgoth case was "ignored" by the BPD.]

    The source of a partial Hi-Tec bootprint inside the couple's home is one of many unanswered questions in the investigation into the Dec. 1996 homicide of 6-year-old JonBenét Ramsey.

    And while the boots Kenady gave investigators belonged to a former resident of the house he allegedly broke into, Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said Monday the boots are not among the items Kenady is accused of stealing.

    Kenady was arrested in Longmont Oct. 10 in connection with breaking into a home in the 4900 block of Valmont Road in July.

    He told sheriff's deputies that Boulder Police Detectives Cmdr. Joe Pelle gave him permission to enter the home in the name of investigating the Ramsey case. Pelle said he never gave Kenady permission to break into the home. Kenady also said he feared evidence would be lost because the house was supposed to be demolished.

    Police suspect Kenady of kicking in a rear door to the home and taking with him three "drafting quality drawings," a $54,000 check and legal papers including a deed of trust.

    Diamond jewelry, several watches and money in one bedroom were untouched, according to police reports.

    The home is owned by the family of a deceased man the Ramseys' investigators have said may have been involved with the beating and strangulation death of their daughter.

    The deceased man shot himself in the chest Feb. 14, 1997, the day after Boulder County District Attorney Alex Hunter held a national press conference in which he said the field of suspects had narrowed and vowed to bring the little girl's killer to justice.

    The man also may have owned a stun gun, which the Ramseys' suspect may have been used in their daughter's death, according to public records. [Yet they refused to grant exhumation to test this theory to qualify it officially one way or the other.]

    The Ramseys remain under police suspicion in their daughter's death, but have repeatedly said they did not kill their daughter and that police should be looking for an intruder. They have moved from their 755 15th St. home and now reside in Atlanta.

    Kenady, who was friends with the deceased man, said he suspected him of having some involvement in the killing, but did not say why, according to police reports.

    The documents stolen from the home were found in Kenady's possession. The drawings belonged to the deceased man.

    Officers at the Boulder Police Department and the Boulder County Sheriff's Office said Kenady may be mentally impaired from a car accident.

    Kenady's attorney, Karin Dostal, said her client is mentally competent.

    She said she would not comment on the case other than to say, "There are certain things that will come out later." [What came out later, and is still coming out, is that Kenady was acting in behalf of Smit and Gray who are using Kenady to promote yet another intruder theory upon which Tracey made his crock that is now being further spun by Lin Wood.]

    Kenady was charged Oct. 13 and is scheduled for a preliminary hearing Nov. 8, which will likely to be rescheduled.

    Ollie Gray, an investigator for the Ramseys, said a family member gave Kenady the boots. Kenady gave Gray the boots through an attorney. Gray turned them over to police in August and answered police questions about them during an interview with the Ramseys in Atlanta at the end of August.

    Contact Christopher Anderson at (303) 473-1355 or andersonc@thedailycamera.com.

    October 25, 2000

  12. #12

    Default

    Excerpt from Judge Julie Carnes' order:

    "Defendants' Book names five people, including plaintiff, whom defendants contend should be further investigated. (SMF 328; PSMF 328.) For example, one lead mentioned is Michael Helgoth, a man who committed suicide two months after the murder and one day after District Attorney Hunter issued a statement that the authorities were narrowing their search for the murderer of JonBenet Ramsey. (SMF 281; PSMF 281.)

    Indeed, a stun gun was found near Mr. Helgoth's body, as well as boots with a "HI-TEC logo like that left on the basement floor of defendants' home. (SMF 281: PSMF 281.) See discussion supra at 15, 18."

    Notice the "perps" used to form the basis of this "new" and "startling" evidence per Tracey's croc originated in the Ramseys' book Death of Innocence, not a recent investigative find by the Hole-in-the-Head gang.

    Notice also that at the time of the Wolf case wherein this order was published there was only ONE set of Hi-Tec boot prints claimed at the Helgoth death scene. That has now morphed into TWO sets of prints.



Similar Threads

  1. "Parents who kill their kids..."
    By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: January 7, 2012, 3:17 pm, Sat Jan 7 15:17:55 UTC 2012
  2. Lacy officially "clears" Ramseys
    By Why_Nut in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 260
    Last Post: August 18, 2008, 5:07 pm, Mon Aug 18 17:07:47 UTC 2008
  3. "South Park," "SNL" & "Mad TV" Ramsey Episodes
    By RiverRat in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: September 2, 2006, 3:54 pm, Sat Sep 2 15:54:35 UTC 2006
  4. Think Parents Couldn't "Do That" to Their Kids?
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: February 12, 2005, 4:39 pm, Sat Feb 12 16:39:10 UTC 2005
  5. "parents wouldn't do this"
    By BobC in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: February 5, 2005, 1:27 pm, Sat Feb 5 13:27:04 UTC 2005

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •