Layers Of Lies

Discussion in 'Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum' started by EasyWriter, Dec 20, 2004.

  1. EasyWriter

    EasyWriter FFJ Senior Member

    The following is on its way via snail mail.

    December 20, 2004

    Kathleen O’Connell, Senior Story Editor
    48 Hours
    524 West 57 Street
    New York, NY, 10019-2924

    Re: Ramsey Case

    Dear Ms. O’Connell,

    On or about June 4, 2003, I sent to the above address a letter
    (regular mail) concerning the ongoing practice of CBS dispensing
    only Ramsey-serving propaganda while excluding any counter
    arguments in the presentations, and while totally ignoring the
    actual evidence. In addition to my letter pointing out certain
    relevant facts, I enclosed a copy of my 39 page letter to Boulder
    DA, Mary Keenan. This letter exposes as fallacy literally every
    alleged item of alleged evidence of an intruder. Not a single point
    in the letter has ever been challenged, let alone refuted.

    The material was returned to me with a cover letter bearing your
    signature and dated June 16, 2003. Your letter of rejection states
    in pertinent part:

    “We received your material, but after careful consideration,
    decided not to report on this matter at the present time. This does
    not, of course, indicate that the subject is unimportant or
    uninteresting. 48 HOURS is faced with the enormously difficult task
    of choosing one topic each week among hundreds that could
    conceivably and justifiably be covered. Our goal is to explore a
    wide variety of stimulating and timely issues. As our broadcast is
    a single subject for the entire hour, we do find that it’s often
    difficult to do an entire hour on even the most compelling stories.
    We often share ideas with our colleagues on 60 minutes and 60
    Minutes II.â€

    The form letter brush off (apparently assuming I am gullible idiot)
    tells a truth not intended to be divulged. Let us now set aside
    your words intended to deceive and put into words of truth what
    your actions tell.

    “We are very interested in the Ramsey case and have already devoted
    considerable air time to it. However, we decided to go with the
    intruder theory no matter what the facts since it has the greater
    potential for needed Ramsey cooperation and audience appeal which
    is necessary to our financial bottom line. It is for this reason
    that I return your material without inquiry or investigation.â€


    This truth is verified by the most recent 48 HOURS psychodrama
    aired on Dec. 18, 2004. It has some entertainment value in that it
    prompted new terminology needed for brief description. The new word
    is “Inventigate.†“Inventigate†is defined as “the practice of
    making up stories and pretending subjective mental inventions are
    objective discovery.†It is “inventigators†such as Lou Smit, Ollie
    Gray, Tracy, St. Augustine, Peterson, et al, who “inventigate.â€


    “Boulder police brushed aside the thousands of leads that came in,
    and dismissed the possibility that an intruder had somehow slipped
    inside the house and committed the murder. Instead, they leaked
    information to the media -- sometimes fabricated information,
    charges of pornography and sexual abuse -- to put pressure on the
    Ramseys.†(From the show)

    I found this very entertaining in a disgusting sort of way. Looking
    at the content of the show and hearing Erin Moriarty accuse the BPD
    of “fabricated information†is hilarious. Now wouldn’t you think
    that Ms. Moriarty would bring out and explain at least one of the
    “thousand of leads?†This is but one of her many outrageous
    comments.

    Throughout the week, the show was touted with claims such as “New
    Evidence. New Suspects.†“We have evidence that will tell you who
    the killer is.â€

    Sure you do. Part of the program was simply dug out of the old
    trash and mixed with new trash. From the past and in the present,
    the program was made up of three elements: Deliberate lies, wild
    speculation and omission of actual evidence. The obvious intent of
    design was to portray the Ramseys as innocent victims persecuted by
    the BPD and falsely maligned by the general public.

    Given the fact there was no intruder, hence, no evidence of any
    intruder, your entire program dedicated to the contrary is a
    complete falsehood. I could take a transcript of the program and
    line by line expose every lie. If you don’t think I can, try me.
    Absent such a request, since you have already made it clear that
    you have no interest in truth, it would only be an exercise in
    futility.

    I have explained the actual evidence many times before. It was in
    what I sent you and you rejected without inquiry or examination. It
    is also online, so no need to repeat here. I want you to understand
    the ramifications of your actions. John and\or Patsy Ramsey are
    responsible for the death of JonBenet. John and Patsy Ramsey are
    conspirators in the cover up of what happened that fateful night.
    The actual evidence leads to no other conclusion.

    At no time during any of the CBS broadcast, 48 HOURS or others, was
    any of the actual evidence identified and explained so that the
    viewing audience could make an informed decision. Instead, actual
    evidence was kept away from all except the few of us who made it
    our business to investigate. In its stead, the propaganda put out
    for general public consumption was and is endless fairy tales
    about an imaginary intruder. This is all the general audience has
    to go on. This is on what they rested their conclusions and
    evaluation and valuation of John and Patsy Ramsey.

    Had it not been for CBS and other media refusing to air the actual
    evidence and give the viewers and readers an accurate picture of
    the crime and crime scene, do you think the Ramseys would have
    filed any lawsuits? Do you think that John Ramsey would have ever
    run for public office? Do you think that John and Patsy Ramsey
    would be paid for making speeches?

    By your disdain for the truth and the encompassing Ramsey-serving
    propaganda, you and the Ramseys are bedfellows in the most shameful
    and most contemptible exploitation of a child I have ever witnessed
    during my long days on this earth; a tragically dead child at that.
    Knowing what I know, what the evidence tells me, when I hear John
    Ramsey, in reference to the death of his daughter, say he was
    “given†an opportunity to “do goodâ€, I shudder in disgusted
    disbelief.


    Are you getting the picture? There are at least three individuals
    who know this for certain: John Ramsey, Patsy Ramsey and myself.
    Evidence does not lie. Nevertheless, as demonstrated by 48 HOURS
    time and time again, lies flow easily to evade and deny evidence.
    In this manner have you and CBS aided and abetted John and Patsy
    Ramsey, not only in covering up the truth about the death of
    JonBenet, but in exploiting her death for public recognition and
    financial gain. I cannot imagine that I will ever again encounter
    anything more contemptible.

    One of the things that occurred to me as I was watching the show
    was that if the general viewing public knew the truth and weighed
    the show content against the truth, 48 HOURS credibility drops to
    zero and the lies to gain a few extra rating points backfires. I’m
    working to see that this happens in some measure.

    Given your displayed attitude of keeping the truth from the general
    public, I am motivated to make public that which you choose to keep hidden. So that others may see exactly what you propose to conceal, a copy of
    this letter will be posted at FFJ and any other places available.

    __________________________
    Delmar England
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2004
  2. Moab

    Moab Admin Staff Member

    :toast:
     
  3. Watching You

    Watching You Superior Bee Admin

    Lest anyone at CBS think that EasyWriter is alone in his contempt of CBS's perpetration of this fraud, let me take this opportunity to state emphatically that I (and I believe everyone at FFJ) stand behind EW and agree with him 100 percent.
     
  4. Voyager

    Voyager Active Member

    EasyWriter....

    Easy Writer has my support in all that he wrote in the letter to the editor of 48 hrs. at the CBS network.....It is such a disgrace when a major network parades such falsehoods and deceptions as news and truth when indeed what they have put together for this 48 hrs. presentation is pure entertainment with the added feature of false promotion of the program's contents to promote ratings and financial gain....A poor testament to the quality of programing for this network and as to their stature as news gatherers and reporters....

    I no longer watch any news on this network because I do not trust either the content or the slant which they put on existing facts....

    Voyager
     
  5. JC

    JC Superior Cool Member

    Good work, Easywriter.

    "...we decided to go with the intruder theory no matter what the facts since it has the greater potential for needed Ramsey cooperation and audience appeal which is necessary to our financial bottom line."

    Of course the intruder theory has greater potential for Ramsey cooperation. The only audience I see it appealing to is, well, ... I don't think it's appealed to any audience. I think sooner or later this will all backfire in Lawyer Lin's lap.
     
  6. Deja Nu

    Deja Nu Banned

    I hereby publicly declare that my full support is given to Delmar England, the author of the above letter to CBS, and any effort he makes to disclose the truth about the Ramsey case and CBS' self-serving interests in promoting what it knows to be false and defamatory information.
     
  7. Thor

    Thor Active Member

    Thank you Delmar. Someone needs to do something, Keenan sure as he!! isn't helping this case. This needs to be challenged and no one is doing so.
     
  8. LurkerXIV

    LurkerXIV Moderator

    Kudos to you, Delmar!

    If you ever come to my town, I want to take you out to dinner to thank you for expressing so well what all FFJ'ers are thinking.

    CBS is a fraudulent corporation pretending to be a channel of public information. They are so corrupt that their broadcast license should be rescinded.

    See-BS is a well-chosen nickname for this bastion of falsehood and purveyor of BIG FAT LIES.
     
  9. Ginja

    Ginja Member

    Send off a copy, Delmar

    I logged in today to see the response to Katie Couric. I didn't get very far, stopping at this letter of yours.

    With all due respect, the idiots at NBC also need a lashing. Did you see that BS this morning? Still harping not only on the dna "evidence," (what a joke!!) but also on the fact that Keenan agreed fully with the Carnes decision. New to this story today (at least to me) is that Carnes had ALL the evidence at her disposal to make such a judgment.

    I give you so much credit Delmar, to keep fighting this fight. I'm so disgusted I've had to walk away from this for a while, else my blood pressure will shoot my head off my shoulders!
     
  10. Deja Nu

    Deja Nu Banned

    KATIE POPS UP ON LIST TO TAKE DAN'S CHAIR

    December 20, 2004 -- CBS has a new name on top of its list of potential replacement for Dan Rather — Katie Couric.

    According to Broadcasting & Cable magazine, CBS wants to "land a superstar to take over" for Rather and the "Today" show diva is its top choice.

    Couric has just 18 months to go on her $15-million a year contract with NBC, the weekly reports in its edition out today.

    ---snip---

    http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/36789.htm
     
  11. JC

    JC Superior Cool Member

    "New to this story today (at least to me) is that Carnes had ALL the evidence at her disposal to make such a judgment."

    Out of the mouth of Lin Wood if I remember right.
     
  12. Show Me

    Show Me FFJ Senior Member

    Go Delmar!

    Amazing we hear no response from the BPD.

    Well.... 48 hours is out to make a buck, no matter what.

    Next time the 48 hours team tries to convince us they working hard to uncover corruption... oh brother! We know what crap they spew.

    Nice going 48 Hours....don't investigate, cave into Woody lawsuit threats.......CBS the Girly Girl station. The Tabloid Television.
     
  13. Deja Nu

    Deja Nu Banned

    The Ramseys' Next Gig

    Coming to a carnival near you!
     

    Attached Files:

  14. VP

    VP Member

    LOL Deja - perfect

    This may have come up - I've scanned the threads and haven't found it, but do you all know who John San Augustin worked for prior to becoming a (paid imhfo), moutpiece for Lin Wood and the Rams? The El Paso Sheriff's Department. Yepper, same as his predecessor, Lou Smit. Just seems sort of odd to me somehow. Didn't numerous articles state that Gray and San Augustin had a consulting business back in 1999 when they started for "free" on the Ramsey case? This article is from minutes of a 2000 meeting in a CSIA newsletter: http://csiainc.org/CSIANewsJun2002.doc

    "The business meeting was adjourned at 9:00 a.m. at which time the speaker, John San Augustin with the El Paso Sheriff's Department, was introduced. John is an expert in the presentation of multi-media evidence and gave an incredible presentation relating to numerous high-profile cases, including the Columbine case. Thank you, John, should we all be so talented!"


    Is San Augustin the person Lou shared information with back in 1999, (mentioned in the article below), especially given that the article above states: "John is an expert in the presentation of multi-media evidence..."
    http://www.longmontfyi.com/ramsey/storyDetail00.asp?ID=34

    "3/23/2000
    Owens not in on deal between Hunter, Smit

    by B.J.Plasket
    Daily Times-Call

    BOULDER — While deciding last fall not to appoint a special prosecutor in the JonBenet Ramsey case, Gov. Bill Owens was apparently unaware of a secret agreement in which prosecutors agreed to give up evidence to a former detective who now works for the Ramsey family.

    While Owens and his team interviewed police and prosecutors and were made privy to most of the evidence in the case, a source close to the situation told the Daily Times-Call the governor was never told about an agreement under which former investigator Lou Smit was given total control of photographs, a crime-scene video and other information contained on a compact disc.

    The agreement between Smit and District Attorney Alex Hunter was made under seal in March 1999, only months after Smit left the case and only weeks after Hunter filed a motion demanding the return of all material gathered by Smit during his 18 months as a special investigator.

    Most of the information given to Smit was contained on the disc, which Smit admitted preparing with the help of a former associate in the El Paso County Sheriff's Department."

    Interesting if you ask me.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2004
  15. Sabrina

    Sabrina Member

    Yep, it sure looks like they go back years and years. Since Lou Smit has joined Ollie and John's private investigative agency, I would surely say this appears to be a conflict of interest if he is still on the Ramsey case in any official way.

    Hey, I tried to see to the Katie Couric interview but President Bush held a press conference and it was pre empted. Then I had to go to work. I am not sure if it ever got shown in the pacific time zone!
     
  16. Tricia

    Tricia Administrator Staff Member

    So, in other words, San Augustin and Smit put together the "PowerPoint Presentation." Therefore it's not a leap to think that San Augustin took the a copy of the Power Point for himself, with Smit's full knowledge of course.
    It's not much of a leap to suggest this is what happened.

    It would explain how San Augustin came to have the picture of Helgoth that was never released to the public.

    It would explain a lot of things actually.

    Nothing will happen of course. Like I have always said, if we had a video of the murder no one would care. However, it is fun knowing that "the dark side" must wonder what we will come up with next. What dirty little secret we will uncover to expose them even more.
     
  17. Zman

    Zman Banned

    "Given the fact there was no intruder, hence, no evidence of any
    intruder, your entire program dedicated to the contrary is a
    complete falsehood."

    What facts? What evidence? Why don't you all get together and make your own 60 min video with all these facts and evidence presented the way you want. Put it up for sale on the net somewhere. Why do you think everyone is so ready to believe whatever 48 Hours tells us? The DNA seemed to be the main theme of the show. They have DNA and they are trying to match it to some one. Ok with me. At the least it keeps the story out there so people just don't forget. Bad press is better than no press. Right?
     
  18. Deja Nu

    Deja Nu Banned

    Squeeze me??? And please tell me what the value of making people remember is if all they remember is ******** that doesn't prove :(:(:(:( while two people still under the umbrella of suspicion for the horrid murder of their 6 year old run free and amok on the airwaves. Isn't that like brain washing or mind control???? Perhaps when they're done swabbing every mouth in Boulder they can move their "investigation" to your town. Say "ah!" Whatever happened to integrity and truth? Is this still America or did I wake up from my cat nap in the former soviet union.... :sucks:
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2004
  19. JC

    JC Superior Cool Member

    "Bad press is better than no press. Right?"

    Wrong. Jmho.
     
  20. EasyWriter

    EasyWriter FFJ Senior Member

    Are you trying to discredit my criticism of 48 HOURS and CBS? :)
    “What facts? What evidence?†C’mon, Zman, let’s not play games.
    In addition to many posts, what I allege to be facts and evidence
    is well chronicled at http://www.acandyrose.com/. How about
    http://www.acandyrose.com/05202003keenanletter.htm for starters.
    Are you telling me that your are not aware of what I call facts
    and evidence? One might get that impression from your question
    which has already been answered by the above references. Some
    folks might call this evasion.

    Let me add another item I consider as fact. Not a single line of
    what I have alleged to be fact has ever been challenged, let
    alone refuted. In an atmosphere wherein there is a popular
    illusion that “unknownâ€, “may beâ€, “could beâ€, and “possible’
    constitute evidence, there are similar illusions regarding the
    concept, challenge.

    A challenge is not asking for a repeat of what has already been
    alleged to be fact; nor it is making up stories like an intruder
    going out and buying “slick cord.†Challenge is not just
    disagreement, but the why of the disagreement. A challenge is to
    first specifically identify by quoting an alleged fact with which
    you disagree. Disagreement presuppose a fact in opposition,
    therefore, present the fact alleged to refute the alleged fact
    challenged. My files, (decades deep) including the letter to
    Keenan follows this procedure. Can you find anything wrong with
    it? If so, what? If not, can you give me a single example of
    where this has happened with anything I have written. If so,
    please bring it out. I want to take a look.

    I see no need to repeat what is already stated in my assorted
    posts and analysis, but there is one thing I will repeat. It’s
    the invitation to anyone and everyone who believes he\she has
    evidence of intruder to meet me online and answer some questions.
    In over four years, not a single individual has risen to the
    challenge. How about you, Zman, care to have a go at it?

    I promise I won’t make a single comment except to clarify your
    expressed or implied position on a given point. I will only ask
    questions. This means it will be your conclusions and only your
    conclusions for the readers to evaluate. Can any proposition be
    more fair than this?

    At another time and in a separate event on the flip side of the
    coin, I will, of course, be happy to respond to any questions you
    ask in regard to what is stated in the afore referenced material.
    Shall we have a go at it?

    As a preview of coming attractions with best chance to prepare,
    you might want to examine my analysis of the Ramsey Complaint
    against Fox News.

    I’m ready anytime you are. I will sincerely appreciate it if you
    will give it a try.
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2004
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice