Page 1 of 30 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 350
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hornetsville, NY
    Posts
    8,871

    Default Whackadoodles Evening 2

    Wow, is Evening 2 bizarre, or what?

    She continually calls Professor McReynolds and his wife (aka Mr. and Mrs .Santa) murderers of JonBenet Ramsey; then, when someone informs her that she is committing libel and could be sued, she tells them they are threatening her and she will "pursue the remedy."

    She reminds me a lot of a couple of former posters at JW who were also very bizarre.

    Evening2 should, in fact, take heed of LegalMatter's advice.

    Oh dear, do you suppose she will accuse WY of being Santa, now? Of course, he's dead, but, there's always Mrs. Santa, I guess.
    Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
    the philosophy which does not laugh,
    and the greatness which does not bow before children.

    ---Kahlil Gibran---

  2. #2

    Default

    Evening2 is one of the more seriously disturbed posters at the swamp. She actually believes she has cracked the case because she alone can see that the McReynolds confessed! In some writing they did! She's posted it! And there it is!

    Or not. Some of the saner swampsters have tried to tell her that no, what she's reading INTO something the McReynolds wrote is NOT in fact a confession of anything, but too bad...she's not listening.

    So Evening goes around calling the McReynolds child killers. It's a help to her that ONE of them is dead. You know, favored RST perps are dead ones who can't respond, defend themselves, or sue. As for Janet McReynolds, since Evening clearly states she believes Janet was a partner in this murder, Janet could sue, but in all probability, she won't. That's because to do so would only bring lots more publicity to being accused of murdering a child, even if the accuser is mentally ill.

    The fact is that the very people who go bonkers over anyone discussing the Ramseys as prime suspects in this case, though they clearly were for at least half a dozen years and have STILL NOT BEEN CLEARED BY LE, are the same people who love to trash truly innocent people and push them under the bus without batting an eye.

    So Ramsey of them.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hornetsville, NY
    Posts
    8,871

    Default

    I think Jayelles said her husband is a lawyer. He'd do well to slap a muzzle on her.
    Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
    the philosophy which does not laugh,
    and the greatness which does not bow before children.

    ---Kahlil Gibran---

  4. #4
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Wackadoodles has always had a fondness for accusing any person who didn't have a murdered six year old in their locked home of being child molesters. I'm surprised she hasn't accused me of it--well she probably has but nobody cares. She can dine at my hotdog stand.

  5. #5

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by BobC
    Wackadoodles has always had a fondness for accusing any person who didn't have a murdered six year old in their locked home of being child molesters. I'm surprised she hasn't accused me of it--well she probably has but nobody cares. She can dine at my hotdog stand.
    Thanks to you Uncle Bob, Wackadoodles is now a permanent fixture in my vocab. I said it the other day, and my son said, "Where did you learn that word?" I said, "Uncle Bob." He looked at me very strange and proceeded to inform me I didn't have an Uncle Bob. I told him it was too deep for him to understand. LOL

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  6. #6
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Hee hee! My crackpot views are spreading like a pestilence! Hey Tez--did you still want a pic of that Stevie Ray Vaughn statue at Towne Lake? I forgot all about that until I walked by it on Saturday.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Watching You
    Wow, is Evening 2 bizarre, or what?

    She continually calls Professor McReynolds and his wife (aka Mr. and Mrs .Santa) murderers of JonBenet Ramsey; then, when someone informs her that she is committing libel and could be sued, she tells them they are threatening her and she will "pursue the remedy."
    "Pursue the remedy"? In other words - Physician, heal thyself.

    Quote Originally Posted by BobC
    She can dine at my hotdog stand.
    Oh, my! (You know, in a way, that emotie kinda does go quite appropriately with your quip.)

    -Tea

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hornetsville, NY
    Posts
    8,871

    Default

    Heh. :eat: :eat:

    I will that the pcguru gets Evening


    Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
    the philosophy which does not laugh,
    and the greatness which does not bow before children.

    ---Kahlil Gibran---

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Seems like Evening 2 has "pursued the remedy" by complaining to jameson!

    The "remedy" :- jameson has started a thread in defence of Evening2 - possibly a mistake. If Janet McReynolds (or any of the McReynolds family actually) or even Louise Armstrong decide to take legal action against her forum, this thread will serve to prove that jameson was aware of the issue of the libelous posts (and that she defended the member's right to make them).

    It is NOT enough to put a disclaimer saying (paraphrased) 'if anyone is distressed by anything written here, contact me'. That only serves as proof that she is aware that there are potentially distressing comments written and would add strength to a libel lawyer's case! In the same way as offering to remove stolen copyrighted material is not a defence against breach of copyright. It is NOT enough to stress that her forum is just a discussion board - cases against discussion boards have now been tested and won.

    IMO, it is NOT enough in this case to say that members are responsible for their own words. I also believe that the fact that jameson charges her members to post could place her on severely dodgy ground if ever there was a libel case against a particular member. Let's face it, a brothel owner cannot deny responsibility for the activities of the prostitutes who rent rooms from her!

    Interestingly, in the recent Internet libel case here, the forum where the libel took place was a Yahoo group and the plaintiff didn't bother to complain to the moderator - he just went straight to his lawyer!. The freedom of speech lawyer criticised him for this, but Michael Smith argued that the posts were unlawful in the first place. The fact that Tracey William's attacks on his were sustained and constant was also enough to prove malice (necessary in a libel case). The offending Yahoo group was simply closed down.

    Evening2 has been attacking the McReynolds for years now - a case for actual malice would be easy to make against her.

    It's very clear that jameson supports ANYONE being accused outright of JonBenet's murder on her forum - provided it isn't a Ramsey or one of their supporters.

    EDITED TO ADD: Godfrey v Demon - ISP was also successfully sued for defamatory comments on a newsgroup which they hosted. Dr Godfrey has won 10 libel cases for defamatory comments posted on the Internet. In one of them, the owner of the forum was considered to be liable also. Several websites have been closed following lawsuits raised by Dr Godfrey.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hornetsville, NY
    Posts
    8,871

    Default

    jammy sue is a fool if she thinks her silly disclaimers protect her. But, that's SOP for her - she posts, or allows to be posted, on her forum defamatory statements, then states she will remove them if the defamed or offended contacts her. That is putting the onus on the victim, and that won't fly, because she admits she knows she has offended simply by her offering to remove them.

    That's akin to going up to someone in a large group and accusing them of murder - then offering to retract the statement if that person writes them a letter requesting that she do so. It's TOO LATE. The damage has been done.

    I only wish mame and her gang of stinking thugs could have been sued for defamation for the things they said about FW a few years ago. Sadly, I suspect the statute of limitations has run out of their blatant libel, and just about anything could be said on-line, then, without repercussions. Not so, today. People are suing and winning.

    I guess we all have to be a little more careful about our accusations, but - remember - if it's true, it's not slander or libel. Therefore, I can still say that Crappy is nuts and the Skank is a liar.
    Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry,
    the philosophy which does not laugh,
    and the greatness which does not bow before children.

    ---Kahlil Gibran---

  11. #11

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by BobC
    Hee hee! My crackpot views are spreading like a pestilence! Hey Tez--did you still want a pic of that Stevie Ray Vaughn statue at Towne Lake? I forgot all about that until I walked by it on Saturday.
    Yes, a million times yes!!!! Thanks Bob!!!!!

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  12. #12
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    you got it.



Similar Threads

  1. Whackadoodles (generic) Thread 3
    By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: February 8, 2009, 9:52 pm, Sun Feb 8 21:52:31 UTC 2009
  2. Whackadoodles 3, et al, too
    By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: May 19, 2008, 9:47 pm, Mon May 19 21:47:24 UTC 2008
  3. FOFLMAO, comic relief from whackadoodles Evening2
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 21, 2006, 10:58 am, Mon Aug 21 10:58:43 UTC 2006

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •