Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 191
  1. #49

    Default

    I know I need to just let this entire case go, but it really bugs me to this day how cavalierly the Ramseys lied to LE. I can reach no other conclusion but that they knew what happened to JonBenet, who did what to whom, and the evidence Patsy wrote the note is solid.

    I mean, come on! PATSY STATES CLEARLY NUMEROUS TIMES SHE PUT THE PANTIES IN THE DRAWER. But there is jams, years later, stating the panties were found in the package SOMEWHERE ELSE, NOT IN THE DRAWER.

    Now, we know jams only knows what those limpheads Ollie and Smit tell her, but how is it that these two WORLD-CLASS DETECTIVES are telling jams that Patsy LIED to LE?

    Oh, we can sure explain that away, can't we? It had been sooooo long, she just was confused, blahblahblah.

    But what is NOT confused is that LE is sitting there telling Patsy Ramsey THE PANTIES ON JONBENET CAME FROM A PACKAGE WHICH PATSY CLEARLY REMEMBERS BUYING IN NEW YORK, and lo and behold, a pair of those panties are found on JonBenet's murdered body, AND YET, THERE ARE NONE OF THE REMAINING PANTIES FROM THAT PACKAGE FOUND IN THE HOME BY LE. Not in the panty drawer, not in any drawer, not on the counter, not in plain sight, not in with the other panties where Patsy stated numerous times SHE PUT THEM, not in the laundry, not in the dryer, not on the floor. NOWHERE IN THE HOME.

    Howzat?

    And the kicker is that jams states that the Ram investigators FOUND the panties STILL IN THE PACKAGE, IN THE HOME, after LE's forensics teams spent 10 days there and never photographed them, never took them into evidence. Of course, in jams duplicitous and always carefully edited versions of her insider info stories, she never says WHERE this package of panties was found. Never says WHEN they were found. Never says WHO found them, by name. NO "LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY" IN THIS SERIOUS DIVERSIONARY SPIN, IS THERE?

    OK, fine. If the RST wants to spin that as LE's fault, old incompetent CBI forensics and BPD, fine. But how does that explain THIS: THE RAMS' INVESTIGATORS FIND THE PACKAGE OF PANTIES IN THE HOME...SOMEWHERE, WE DON'T KNOW WHERE...AND THEY TAKE CUSTODY OF THEM...AND THEY DON'T GIVE THEM TO LE FOR SIX YEARS?

    Now, consider that the RST KNOWS how important these panties are ALL ALONG. This interview took place in 2000. Patsy was asked about the panties in 1998, as well. Schiller wrote about them. Thomas wrote about them. Patsy herself STATES she's READ SOMEWHERE about the fact that they were too big. She has obviously THOUGHT about this. Her lawyers have THOUGHT about this. She has obviously been DRILLED on this, as her FIRST clear and concise answer demonstrates. Yet even in 2000, with Kane and Beckner and other DA and BPD LE making it CLEAR that this is a BIG ISSUE...EVEN THEN, neither Wood nor Patsy nor the Ramsey investigators say WORD ONE about the very PANTIES IN QUESTION BEING IN THEIR POSSESSION!

    They also KNOW there is an issue with the DNA. They KNOW the BPD has said publicly that it may come from the manufacturer, which having the other panties tested could help prove or disprove. Do the Ramseys want IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE cleared up so LE can move on to other important evidence to track down that intruder? OR NOT?

    I say NOT! How could they KEEP SILENT about such evidence IN THEIR POSSESSION for 6 years? THIS is that infamous "cooperation"? HA! BS!

    Jams tried to spin that they didn't trust LE to process it. That's BS. Who is going to process it? The Border Patrol? Then GIVE IT TO THEM!

    But no. The Ramseys and their investigators and lawyers CONSPIRED FOR SIX YEARS TO WITHHOLD EVIDENCE IN A CHILD MURDER CASE!

    Either that, or THEY LIED WHEN THEY SAID THEY'D HAD IT FOR 6 YEARS, UNTIL THEY HAD THE CASE SAFELY IN KEENAN'S HANDS AND TURNED IT OVER TO HER AS EVIDENCE.

    I'm sorry for all the screaming. Most times I'm using caps to emphasize points, like bullet points, because my posts are so long, but now, I'M SHOUTING!

    OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE! BY HER OWN PARENTS AND THEIR LEGAL TEAMS! FOR SIX YEARS!

    How that ends up with Keenan and Judge Carnes and Smit and every damn sorry excuse for a person sworn to seek justice for victims in this country weeping and fawning over the Ramseys is truly diabolical!

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!
    Last edited by Cherokee; June 2, 2012, 10:15 pm at Sat Jun 2 22:15:20 UTC 2012.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  2. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default Kk

    I made the model on Friday but it collapsed slightly when I had to move it. I tried my best to straighten it out but I don't know if it's worked yet. I hung it up in the utility room over the weekend whilst we were away sailing. We're not long back and I'm totally shattered and heading for bed!

    I also intend to make detailed measurements of Tootsie for the record because she's growing so quickly just now and I'm aware this isn't an experiment I'll get a chance to repeat.

    The modelling material is quite thick so it might end up being too big so I need to measure that too. If it's too big, I'll go back to the drawing board. I have a plan B and that will be aided by an artist friend.

    Interesting that there is no mention of this over yonder. I made a post about it at CTV where the discussion was diverted and utilmately trashed by the RST.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  3. #51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    I made the model on Friday but it collapsed slightly when I had to move it. I tried my best to straighten it out but I don't know if it's worked yet. I hung it up in the utility room over the weekend whilst we were away sailing. We're not long back and I'm totally shattered and heading for bed!

    I also intend to make detailed measurements of Tootsie for the record because she's growing so quickly just now and I'm aware this isn't an experiment I'll get a chance to repeat.

    The modelling material is quite thick so it might end up being too big so I need to measure that too. If it's too big, I'll go back to the drawing board. I have a plan B and that will be aided by an artist friend.

    Interesting that there is no mention of this over yonder. I made a post about it at CTV where the discussion was diverted and utilmately trashed by the RST.
    The RST will ALWAYS make sure any discussion about the too large panties is diverted and squashed. They take their cue from Patsy on that. Because any discussion of it leads to Patsy caught lying and obfuscating a piece of evidence that is truly important in identifying the killer of JonBenet.

    It is also tied into the molestation.

    Jayelles, I don't suppose you know any department store or children's shop owners or employees...? Seems to me if you could get a few minutes to try those Bloomies on a child's mannequin of the right size, snap a few pics, that might work.

    I'm sorry your efforts have been thwarted thus far. You are amazing to try so hard. I'm glad you had your sailing for respite.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  4. #52

    Default

    Koldkase,
    The below is brilliant. 2 years ago you summed this up perfectly and it deserves to be posted again!

    To: KOLDKASE2 (41 of 41)

    1716.41 in reply to 1716.40

    OK, this is about all I can do with this, so that's the good news....

    If the pink pj bottoms are missing, which I have never even seen them discussed much, so I don't know, but if they are missing, then this may be the key to why JonBenet is wearing those Wednesday panties.

    Suppose that JonBenet went to bed in her pink pjs--which is why the top is still on the bed in the crime scene photos. Suppose that something happened...pick your favorite scenario...that caused the killer to take those pjs off of her. (The top was discarded and forgotten in the disarray of the bed.) Why did the pink pj bottoms vanish? If the bottoms are missing, that would indicate that the killer did not want LE to find evidence in them. Urine? Blood? The panties JonBenet had on would also have disappeared with the pink pj bottoms in that case.

    So the killer needs panties to put on JonBenet, along with the long johns and white top. For the sake of discussion, consider the idea that JonBenet was known to wear day of the week panties, as I have thought for years (erroneously maybe, since Jahazafat found the source of this to be a tabloid, but I believe LHP was the person I thought stated this). The killer has to know this or why not just pull out any panties in the drawer? Why OPEN a package of Bloomies and pick Wednesday panties?

    All I can think of is because the killer knew she wore these, knew that at the White's, her friends may have noticed them during toileting, or an adult might have noticed while helping her in the bathroom.

    Why would an intruder care?


    He wouldn't. Choosing Wednesday panties had to be done for a reason, that reason being that the person who put them on her did so to disguise one thing: that she had been changed, that the panties she had on were somehow soiled, and that the killer wanted that fact concealed for some reason.

    Now, I know that this theory relies on JonBenet having other day of the week panties she was known to wear. I have thought for years that Patsy had bought JonBenet a package at Bloomies in her size as well, but that may be misinformation that I accepted through time and repetition.

  5. #53

    Default

    Well, I don't know about brilliant, because there are so many ifs in our theories, and they're all built on so much others have posted through the years. Even when I think I have an original thought, like this one, I stumble upon a long forgotten thread where it was someone else altogether that led us down that path. hahaha When I say at this point I've forgotten more than I remember about this case, I'm not exaggerating.

    But that pink top on JB's bed is addressed in the '98 interview with Patsy--I think, it was that one. She says JonBenet kept her pjs under her pillow. But there is only ONE PIECE of those pjs on the bed. This picture of this bed is all wrong, if you look at it.

    http://www.acandyrose.com/002jonbenetbed.jpg

    http://www.acandyrose.com/003jonbenetbed.jpg

    OK, it's Christmas, pjs don't get put under the pillow neatly, I can accept that. But the Ramseys say Patsy and John took JB upstairs, put her to bed still asleep, she never stirred. Patsy is looking for bottoms to put on JB. Patsy said she couldn't find JB's usual bottoms, so she just took the long john bottoms out of the drawer. Where were the matching pink bottoms? There's the top. On the bed. There's the pillow...at the foot of the bed.

    And about those day of the week panties. We see Patsy in the 2000 interview claiming she didn't remember if she bought JB a package of those Bloomies in her own size. But then Patsy said the Bloomies were special...and IF JB was known to wear those day of the week panties, as LHP said at some point and I can't remember where, but maybe in PMPT or Thomas' book, why WOULDN'T Patsy have bought her some? Of course, it's possible she just neglected to do so, shopping frenzy, that kind of thing, but if she didn't, and then JB wanted to keep the ones too large because she wanted some, too...why wouldn't Patsy remember this? Obviously, Patsy DOES remember a lot, but she doesn't remember WHY she decided to give JB panties way too large bought for her cousin? I'm NOT buying this.

    Now, think about that bed: it's a mess. You put your child to sleep, ok, the bed wasn't made during a busy day in a holiday season. No big deal. But if you're putting your child into it asleep, wouldn't you take DISCARDED CLOTHES off of it BEFORE you dressed her and pulled up the sheets and covers to tuck her in?

    And I am telling you, I do not believe that Patsy BS about saying a prayer over JB while she slept in the bed: Now I lay me down to sleep.... I think that's just more of Patsy's bid for sympathy, cheap drama. If I HAD said that prayer over my daughter mere hours before her body was found murdered, I'd never have been able to utter those words again! But there's Patsy, doing a replay for the world on TV. Prime Time, baby!

    John identifies the colored sweater on JB's bed as Patsy's, as well. Why is Patsy's sweater on JB's bed that morning? Again, when would Patsy have removed her own sweater in JB's room and left it on her bed? And why would it STILL be there, after Patsy says she undressed JB and redressed her in long johns and tucked her in? Why wouldn't Patsy pick up her own sweater off the bed and lay it on the other bed, at least, if she couldn't be bothered to take it up to her own room or put it in the laundry?

    The usual RST spin seems to be that Patsy was a housekeeping slob. Yeah, well, that's certainly a good excuse when it seems some of the critical clothing from the day and night before her child was murdered went missing somehow. Or did the intruder just pack a SUITCASE before he climbed back out the basement window? Oh, and he MEANT to have JB inside it, but he didn't have room, what with the wardrobe he wanted for a souvenir.

    Then there is the other bed, with a large piece of dark clothing on it. I can't remember if that was identified by the Ramseys in '98, but I think it might have been. Maybe someone else can remember. I can look it up, but not tonight. I have other fish to fry.

    http://www.acandyrose.com/005jonbenetbed.jpg
    Last edited by koldkase; August 6, 2006, 11:52 pm at Sun Aug 6 23:52:59 UTC 2006.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  6. #54

    Default

    I went back and reread...and either I'm dense, or I just can't grasp some of this in large doses because we're only seeing questions asked and answered with no supporting evidence that makes it clear immediately, like exactly what clothes of JB's are missing and which ones are not.

    But now I'm focusing on something Patsy said that could mean two things, which I didn't catch the probably meaning, now that I look at it.

    First, Patsy stated it was JONBENET'S IDEA to buy the Bloomies undies. Then Patsy stated she didn't remember if she'd bought one or two packagees...which I took to mean, one package for Jenny and a second package for JonBenet, but now I think, looking at the question before that answer, she meant she didn't know if she bought one or two packages for JONBENET. Hard to be sure, but that makes more sense, as surely she'd have bought at least ONE package for JonBenet if JonBenet was the one who wanted to buy them in the first place. So...it makes sense to me Patsy meant she DID buy JB her own package, but might have bought two for her.

    So, I guess LE must have found some of those panties in JB's size. But all those in the drawer were size 4/6. Patsy stated they were too small for JB, but says she doesn't remember what size she did buy. If she bought 8/10, which would be the next size up, LE would have found those, it seems. Maybe they did but found the smaller ones and are stating the smaller size from memory. Or something like that. Gosh, I really wish we had this information. It's such a waste of time speculating over ever-changing stories about evidence, it's exhausting.


    2 Q. Which of those two trips did you

    3 purchase the Bloomi's?

    4 A. The first trip.

    5 Q. Was it something that was selected

    6 by JonBenet?

    7 A. I believe so.


    8 Q. Was it your intention, when you

    9 purchased those, for those to be for her,

    10 not for some third party as a gift?

    11 A. I bought some things that were

    12 gifts and some things for her. So I

    13 don't --

    14 Q. Just so I am clear, though, it is

    15 your best recollection that the purchase of

    16 the underpants, the Bloomi's days of the

    17 week, was something that you bought for her,

    18 whether it was just I am buying underwear

    19 for my kids or these are special, here's a

    20 present, that doesn't matter, but it was your

    21 intention that she would wear those?

    22 A. Well, I think that I bought a

    23 package of the -- they came in a package of

    24 Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday.

    25 I think I bought a package to give to my

    0081

    1 niece.

    2 Q. Which niece was that?

    3 A. Jenny Davis.

    4 Q. They came in, if you recall, do

    5 you remember that they come in kind of a

    6 plastic see-through plastic container.

    7 A. Right.

    8 Q. They are rolled up?

    9 A. Yes.

    10 Q. So if I understand you correctly,

    11 you bought one package for Jenny Davis, your

    12 niece, and one for JonBenet?

    13 A. I am not sure if I bought one or

    14 two.


    15 Q. Do you remember what size they

    16 were?

    17 A. Not exactly.
    So Patsy was all over the place. But I think she's trying to say she didn't JUST buy the package for JonBenet, but for Jenny, as well. That turns it around, doesn't it? She's not saying she didn't buy the package for JonBenet. She's saying she DID, MAYBE TWO. But one for Jenny as well, and that's the too large size that was found on JB on the 26th.

    So, I'm thinking it's confirmed by this interview that JonBenet did have her own size in the Bloomies, at least one package and maybe two.

    Now, one other thing I want to ask about this, and then I'll stop with this topic, I promise:

    Does anyone here do the family laundry? Patsy said she's done lots of laundry. I do lots of laundry. Have since I was a kid. Long before people of my class had dryers. We did have a regular washing machine, though, and a clothesline. Hung clothes out and brought them in, winter and summer. I actually miss my old clothesline, against the 'hood ordinance to have one these days. Nothing like the smell of sunshine sheets on the bed. But I digress....

    I wondering if anyone here who took/takes care of a family and sorts dirty clothes, then washes and drys and folds and puts away the clothes, possibly really doesn't notice what underwear they've folded and put away for their family?

    See, that's my job. I not only notice those things, I have a practical reason to notice: don't want to bleach clothes that would be ruined. Want to bleach clothes that need to be sanitized and whitened. Want to make sure they're clean when finished. Want to make sure they're not torn or the elastic isn't coming off and they need replacing. Want to make sure nobody is sick or having dietary problems, especially children.

    See, I even notice if they're getting too small. I routinely buy clothes for the family, shoes, underwear, because they get worn, torn, stained, outgrown, etc.

    Since we know JonBenet had some kind of recurring infections in her genital area for which she was taken to the doctor several times, and since we know her hymen was basically no longer intact or even present for the most part, as well as she had chronic inflammation of the vaginal tissue at the TOD and so was continuing to have problems of SOME KIND in that area...is there any reasonable way to assume that Patsy did NOT notice those problems showing up in JB's underwear? Of course there would have been some blood. She complained of itching, which Patsy surely would have noticed. Patsy took her to be diagnosed and treated, didn't she?

    Hey...something else just hit me. In this interview, LE asked Patsy about the dates when she was in New York that fall. They mention two trips, one in November, and one in December, when JonBenet was in the parade and presumably the Ramseys were not home.

    This is jogging my memory. Didn't Patsy make three phone calls in one day to Dr. Beuf's office...in early December? No one seems to know what those calls were about.

    Now I'm wondering...if John and Patsy were out of town...and that was RIGHT BEFORE Patsy's calls to Dr. Beuf...maybe there's a connection there. Maybe Patsy came home and found JonBenet needed medical attention.

    Ok. Let me see if I can figure those dates out.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  7. #55

    Default

    OK, from ACR's timeline, I get this. I looked up some of the information, but so far, all I have found is the Christmas Parade that year was on Dec. 6. The application had a deadline of Nov. 26. There is a fax number at the top with a possible date, but it's not clear for me what the date is.

    I looked up the info in DOI where the Ramseys talked about their annual participation in the Christmas parade since 1993. It started with Burke's Boy Scout group. But in 1996, it was JonBenet and "some friends" riding on the back of a convertible driven by the Archulettas. But there is not one word about the fact that the John and Patsy were in New York with the Stines, not at the parade.

    The first New York trip with the mothers and daughters seems to have the days of the trip obscured in DOI, like much else in this case. In DOI, the Rams give no specific date. I think ACR simply put 11/00 to indicate some time in November. One of the glaring omissions from their book is specific information about times and dates. That told me right there they had no intention of ever clearing up those mysteries, only deepening them.

    But Patsy admits in the 2000 Atlanta interview that she and John and the Stines were in New York the day of the parade, which was a Friday, Dec. 6. But John's company Christmas party was Dec. 7, Saturday.

    So the Ramseys spent Thanksgiving on Nov. 21 in Atlanta. Then Patsy's big birthday party was on Nov. 30. She and John were in New York on Dec. 6 with the Stines. Did they go there for a few days after Patsy's party on Nov. 30, putting them there for at least a few of the days between Nov. 30 to Dec. 7, when they must have flown home, because they'd have gone to the Christmas parade if they went home on the 6th, I would think.

    So the parade was on Dec. 6. and Patsy and John were in New York, but back home for the party on Dec. 7. Patsy shopped at McGuckin's Dec. 9. Then Patsy called Dr. Beuf's office 3 times on Dec. 17.

    1996-11-00 (--) 1996-11-00 (--) Patsy and JonBenet to New York to FOA Schwartz Christmas shopping (DOI pg 4)
    1996-11-12 (--) JonBenet Ramsey to Dr. Beuf for sinus infection (PMPT pg 257)
    1996-11-21 (--) Linda/Mervin/Ariana Pugh in Ramsey house over Thanksgiving (DOI pg 166)
    1996-11-21 (--) Patsy Ramsey/JonBenet attended musical production in Marietta, Georgia (DOI pg 39)
    1996-11-21 (--) Ramseys spent Thanksgiving holiday in Atlanta, Georgia (DOI pg 166)
    1996-11-30 (--) Patsy Ramsey's 40th Birthday party at Brown Palace in Denver
    1996-12-00 (--) Linda Hoffmann-Pugh put up artificial Christmas trees (DOI pg 166)
    1996-12-00 (--) Linda Hoffmann-Pugh put up Christmas decorations (DOI pg 166)
    1996-12-02 (--) Patsy Ramsey purchased $46.31 at McGuckin Hardware (DOI pg 119)
    1996-12-03 (--) JonBenet Ramsey to Dr. Marilyn Dougherty for eyesight checked (PMPT pg 258)
    1996-12-06 (--) Patsy Ramsey's application for Lights of December parade (DOI pg 98)
    1996-12-06 (D) JonBenet Ramsey "Lights of December Parade" (Application) *
    1996-12-00 (--) JonBenet and Burke Ramsey in Lights of December parade Boulder (DOI pg 98)

    1996-12-07 (R) John Ramsey's company, Access Graphics annual Christmas party
    1996-12-00 (T) Ramsey Christmas Newsletter 1996 *
    1996-12-09 (--) Patsy Ramsey purchased $99.88 at McGuckin Hardware (DOI pg 119)
    1996-12-14 (--) The Foyer Group Christmas Party at Ramsey home (80 guests)
    1996-12-14 (--) Police didn't discover about the 12-14-1996 party until 01-31-1998 (ST pg 266)
    1996-12-16 (--) Access Graphics party billion dollar sales celebration (DOI pg 135)
    1996-12-17 (--) JonBenet "Colorado's Little Miss Christmas" 6 yrs old
    1996-12-17 (--) JonBenet Ramsey won "Colorado's Little Miss Christmas" pageant (DOI pg 33)
    1996-12-17 (--) Patsy Ramsey called Dr. Beuf 3 times (Reason unknown) (ST pg304)
    http://www.acandyrose.com/timeline-transcripts1996.htm

    http://www.acandyrose.com/12061996paradeapplication.gif

    Looking up the Christmas parade stuff in their book, I figured out that the hard-to-read part of that parade application (second url) says something close to "___ with Pam Archuletta Exec Dir of Boulder County United Way."
    Last edited by koldkase; August 7, 2006, 5:42 am at Mon Aug 7 5:42:19 UTC 2006.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  8. #56

    Default

    Hi KK, In the 6/98 PR interview (line 236) Haney asked if JBR had day of week panties and PR confirms it. (Not narrowed down to new panties though) Also it says (line 579) Dr Beufs office was called 3 times on Dec 7 @ 6:28, 6:50 and 6:59. So it looks like the Dr was called before the Christmas Party? and the day or day after they returned home from the NY visit. PR couldn't remember why he was called 3 times though. Also I wonder if the exact times of the calls were from PHONE RECORDS or the Dr's records. Sorry I don't know how to post the lines from the transcript - thank you ACandyRose again for the site and resources and Why Nut's site is literally moving with the video evidence. All of you help us noobs enormously in your own way. Thanks to all @ FFJ.

  9. #57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cranberry
    Hi KK, In the 6/98 PR interview (line 236) Haney asked if JBR had day of week panties and PR confirms it. (Not narrowed down to new panties though) Also it says (line 579) Dr Beufs office was called 3 times on Dec 7 @ 6:28, 6:50 and 6:59. So it looks like the Dr was called before the Christmas Party? and the day or day after they returned home from the NY visit. PR couldn't remember why he was called 3 times though. Also I wonder if the exact times of the calls were from PHONE RECORDS or the Dr's records. Sorry I don't know how to post the lines from the transcript - thank you ACandyRose again for the site and resources and Why Nut's site is literally moving with the video evidence. All of you help us noobs enormously in your own way. Thanks to all @ FFJ.
    Thank you, Cranberry! Great. I have the NE book and can look that up. You saved me a lot of time. And you caught an error I made with my recap, as well as a discrepancy between Thomas' information that Patsy called Beuf on the 17th, but Haney said to Patsy it was on the 7th. Either there's a typo in one of those, or in transcribing the interview tapes for the NE, the 7th was substituted for the 17th--so that means we need another source to pin that down. Let me check PMPT.

    What I'm looking for now is old information about when the Ramseys were in New York with the Stines. I didn't remember that until I read this transcript again from the 2000 interview.

    But Dec. 7 was a Saturday. So if the true date of Patsy's phone calls is the 7th, that would have to be the day they returned from New York and the calls would have gone to an answering service, I think.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  10. #58

    Default

    Ok, I found a couple of pages of summary of JB's medical history from Dr. Beuf in PMPT. But there is no mention in there that I could locate using the index of Beuf's name stating anything about those three phone calls on either the 7th or the 17th.

    One curious thing Schiller did write is that when Patsy was diagnosed with cancer in '93, JonBenet "went" to stay with Nedra. It was during this time, the book states, that JB regressed in her toilet training, eating, and develped sinus problems and bad breath, as well as developing a very bad diaper rash. Of course, at three years of age, if she was sent to Atlanta to live in an environment she wasn't used to and missed her parents, that seems natural enough, regression.

    But then, OF COURSE, we have another story, as one of the maids is interviewed for a few pages and says Nedra moved in with the Ramseys during that time, which we have heard. Susan Savage took care of JonBenet during that time, the former maid said.

    I did find where Haney asked Patsy about the nightgown found with JonBenet's body. They go through her sleepwear and Patsy said that JonBenet had slept Christmas Eve in the pink pjs, the top of which is the one on her bed in the picture. Patsy also stated that those pink pjs were under the pillow. The thing that caught my eye also is that Patsy started out to say one thing about those pink pjs and stopped herself--red flag--corrected her flow of thought, and then said JonBenet wore the white long johns that night.

    TH: When would she have worn that [Barbie nightgown] last, do you know?
    PR: Well, she didn't wear it that night because she had her -- she had the long underwear pants and her little white shirt. And the night before on Christmas Eve night she wore the pink little...that was under her pillow. And before that I don't remember. But neither of those two nights she wore that.
    So...was Patsy just thinking...stopping...it had been awhile. But there is that one little problem: if those pjs were under the pillow, where are the bottoms and why couldn't Patsy find them to put on the sleeping child? There's the top. Where are the pink pj bottoms that JB wore Christmas Eve, that should have been under the pillow, that Patsy couldn't find there that night? Of course, maybe LE has had them for 10 years. How would we know? They don't ask her where about them that I remember.

    So Patsy had to pull off black velvet pants, never noticing the huge panties still on the sleeping JB, and then she rumaged around in the drawers until she came upon the long johns and pulled those on the child, pulled up the covers and left clothes lying all over the bed.

    And the upshot of all this is the other 6 pairs of undies in the package of 12/14 Bloomies managed to get lost by LE and found by the RST, who keeps them for 6 years and then turns the over to Keenan, being so cooperative with LE and all. m

    Oh, are the black velvet pants the black item at the end of the bed, on the chest? Or are they the black item on the other bed...?

    http://www.acandyrose.com/002jonbenetbed.jpg

    http://www.acandyrose.com/005jonbenetbed.jpg

    You know, I do remember we once might have even figured out what both the black and the colored thingie on the other bed are, but I can't for the life of me remember what the conclusion was. Anybody else remember?

    And here is the pink pj top turned inside out on the bed:

    http://www.acandyrose.com/003jonbenetbed.jpg
    Last edited by koldkase; August 7, 2006, 7:59 am at Mon Aug 7 7:59:08 UTC 2006.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  11. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    BINGO KK. My model will do. It has collapsed a little at the shoulders and I have to be careful with one of the legs, but I've dressed it in a leotard and tights and the flaws aren't too obvious :-)

    Most importantly, the measurements are correct, so even if the surface is slightly lumpy, it doesn't matter because what we want to see is the "fit".

    I have to go out this afternoon and my camera needs to charge up, but I'll post the images this evening.

    For the record, Tootsie is 47inches in height and she weights 46lbs - the same height and one pound heavier than JonBenet was when she died. She is therefore almost exactly the same size.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  12. #60
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default Girls Size 12-14 "Bloomies" Modeled On a Six-Year-Old Like JonBenet

    OK I apologise in advance for my shoddy workmanship and poor photography. My model collapsed a little when I moved it - a shoulder and one of the legs. I left it over the weekend to dry and this evening I carefully padded it out so that the measurements were accurate. It's a bit lumpier than a human model would be, but the measurements are correct and that is the main thing.

    My Tootsie's measurements are as follows:-

    Height 47 inches (same as Jonbenet)
    Weight 46 lbs (1lb heavier than Jonbenet)
    Chest - 22 inches
    Waist - 20 inches
    Hips - 23 inches
    Thigh - 13 inches

    NOTE: The names of the files all end in the word "resized" - that has nothing to do with the model but refers to the photographs. I resized the photos to post them here.

    The first three photographs are showing the model's waist, hip and thigh being measured.

    ETA - sorry that should be thighs 13 inches - my Tootsie does NOT have 16 inch thighs!
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission



Similar Threads

  1. Book Proposal for "Prostitution of Justice" by Thomas C. "Doc" Miller
    By Tricia in forum ***Sneek Preview*** - Tom Miller's Book
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 4, 2007, 9:15 pm, Sat Aug 4 21:15:02 UTC 2007
  2. John Ramsey's '98 Interview...Things That Were "Strange" or "Out Of Place"
    By AMES in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: June 19, 2007, 11:51 am, Tue Jun 19 11:51:40 UTC 2007
  3. "South Park," "SNL" & "Mad TV" Ramsey Episodes
    By RiverRat in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: September 2, 2006, 3:54 pm, Sat Sep 2 15:54:35 UTC 2006
  4. The Ramseys and "lynchings" and "lynch mobs"
    By JustinCase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: June 20, 2004, 1:25 pm, Sun Jun 20 13:25:02 UTC 2004
  5. Debunking the Seven Pieces of "Evidence" That "Prove" the Intruder Theory.
    By Dunvegan in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: September 10, 2002, 7:34 pm, Tue Sep 10 19:34:10 UTC 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •