Page 2 of 30 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 357
  1. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Why_Nut
    There is a way of handling the "shouting out of questions" that has worked very effectively for the various Presidents of the United States. It is called "ignoring the question." Oh, but perhaps Lacy will be too embarrassed by the questions she might have shouted at her and even more embarrassed when she leaves them unanswered. Personally, I hope some reporters do shout out questions so that we are treated to yet another spectacle of having reasonable questions met with a strongarm response as the questioner is thrown out of the room. That would be quite the demonstration of what Lacy's character consists of.
    Oh, yeah, now that would be a PERFECT ENDING to this charade in The Republic of Boulder!

    Surely some reporter is going in there with the balls to do this.

    Surely.

    WHERE'S TRICIA! Get on the next plane to BOULDER!!

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  2. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    KK,

    I think Tricia Griffith is on Boulder's NO FLY list.
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  3. #15
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    aahhhh damage control.

  4. #16

    Default

    On the OFF CHANCE that some reporters might start reading here when they wake up from their hangovers this morning (now now, that's not a slur, I know my press corps!!!), let's start posting some fun questions for the press conference:

    - Why did you let Kolar (previous investigator) go? Did he participate in the Karr investigation?

    - The Carnes decision was based on one-sided evidence with no rebuttal. Why did you accept it as dispositive?

    - What is your relationship with Lin Wood?

    - Your office only spent $25,000 in four years on this investigation, please explain,

    - From the emails you released, Lou Smit, Ollie Gray, and Michael Tracey, all private citizens, were investigating this case with Tom Bennett. Is this a proper investigative method?

    - The emails constantly refer to Michael Tracey drinking alcohol while he is writing to Karr. Does this concern you in regard to his reliability?

    - (Reporter hold up Patsy's handwriting analysis) Can you explain why Patsy Ramsey's handwriting matches the ransom note?

    - What are your criminal investigation qualifications?

    - Do you feel you have any credibility with the Boulder Police Department? Is this a public safety issue?

    - If the only thing that was going to make you go forward was DNA match, why didn't you do that in Thailand?

  5. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    755

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wombat
    - If the only thing that was going to make you go forward was DNA match, why didn't you do that in Thailand?
    - If getting a sample from items Karr handled in Thailand was not good enough proof because of the risk of mixture, does this mean that the DNA sample found in the underwear is, at this point, also insufficient proof of the genetic identity of JonBenet's killer, because it is a mixture?

  6. #18

    Default

    Ha! Good one, Why Nut!

  7. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Why_Nut
    - If getting a sample from items Karr handled in Thailand was not good enough proof because of the risk of mixture, does this mean that the DNA sample found in the underwear is, at this point, also insufficient proof of the genetic identity of JonBenet's killer, because it is a mixture?
    Oh, not only THAT, but according to the DNA document you have from one of the Tracey docs...the Ramseys can be eliminated as THE SOURCE OF THE DNA ONLY IF THERE IS ONE CONTRIBUTOR....

    Wasn't that what it said? That's what I remember.

    Does this mean THE RAMSEYS ARE NOT EXCLUDED NOW?

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  8. #20
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    I'm going to the press conference.

    I will submit the following question in writing:

    Dear Miss Lacy:

    Who did you sleep with to get this job?

    Thanks so much
    BobC

  9. #21

    Default

    BobC, that's a bit of a stretch, dontcha think? I mean you are assuming a lot there.




    You're assuming someone, someone powerful, would want to sleep with her.

  10. #22
    BobC is offline Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    well there has to be some explanation

  11. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Why_Nut
    - If getting a sample from items Karr handled in Thailand was not good enough proof because of the risk of mixture, does this mean that the DNA sample found in the underwear is, at this point, also insufficient proof of the genetic identity of JonBenet's killer, because it is a mixture?
    Now that you mention it WN, I am once again confused.

    Has it been stated by any expert that the DNA they in fact have, truly EXCLUDES the Ramseys, or is it one of those things that we have heard so many times, it got us sucked in as a fact?
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  12. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    755

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbara
    Now that you mention it WN, I am once again confused.

    Has it been stated by any expert that the DNA they in fact have, truly EXCLUDES the Ramseys, or is it one of those things that we have heard so many times, it got us sucked in as a fact?
    From the artistic efforts of Jayelles, I recall, grabbing the appropriate sections of the broadcast paperwork and knitting them together:




Similar Threads

  1. Complete Transcript - Mary Lacy Press Conference About John Mark Karr - 8/29/06
    By Jayelles in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 14, 2006, 3:09 pm, Thu Sep 14 15:09:11 UTC 2006
  2. Complete Transcript - Mary Lacy Press Conference About John Mark Karr - 8/29/06
    By Jayelles in forum Transcripts: Ramsey murder case
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 14, 2006, 3:09 pm, Thu Sep 14 15:09:11 UTC 2006
  3. Keenan-Lacy Press Conference
    By Karole28 in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 17, 2006, 5:42 pm, Thu Aug 17 17:42:03 UTC 2006
  4. Video of press conference with Karr
    By Scarifier in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: August 17, 2006, 4:46 pm, Thu Aug 17 16:46:29 UTC 2006

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •