Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 72 of 271

Thread: JMK and the BB

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JC
    I think as soon as Karr finds out jameson has invited anyone who wants to take his posts to other forums, he'll drop her like a hot potato, if he hasn't already.

    I disagree

    I think he is hoping, along with Jameson, (despite her protestations) that he gets real notoriety on the internet along with whatever TV, Interviews, etc. he can get

    He'll take any and all attention. Don't forget, he's not giving away any information; it's all in his manuscript and his super duper nuclear secret gothic box that only he knows about and Jams is praying to get her hands on. (would be funny if he had Jams' play in that box ....and nothing else)

    There is money to be made and it will be interesting to see whether Jams or Karr is cagier. Either way, they both need the attention and likely some cash at the moment and birds of a feather and all...
    PATSY RAMSEY WROTE THE RANSOM NOTE
    SHE WOULDN'T DO THAT FOR AN INTRUDER.
    PLEASE READ CHEROKEE'S ANALYSIS

    http://66.98.176.96/~tricia/forums/s...ead.php?t=6404

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbara
    I disagree

    I think he is hoping, along with Jameson, (despite her protestations) that he gets real notoriety on the internet along with whatever TV, Interviews, etc. he can get

    He'll take any and all attention. Don't forget, he's not giving away any information; it's all in his manuscript and his super duper nuclear secret gothic box that only he knows about and Jams is praying to get her hands on. (would be funny if he had Jams' play in that box ....and nothing else)
    There is money to be made and it will be interesting to see whether Jams or Karr is cagier. Either way, they both need the attention and likely some cash at the moment and birds of a feather and all...
    Now THERE'S a thought! LOL
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  3. #63

    Post

    Chero,

    I am still laughing at your name for Karr. Frankenkarr, I love it!!!!

    He doesn't want to be heckled??? Well, I can think of an easy solution for that, SHUT UP and GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!

    Jayelles, I wonder if she does get off on his sick fantasies? I can't read them, they make me ill. The eMails between JMK and Tracey just about sent me over the edge, so I really don't want to read whatever other sick fantasies this creep has!!!!

    The above is just my opinion, right or wrong, but please leave it at FFJ.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tez
    Chero,

    I am still laughing at your name for Karr. Frankenkarr, I love it!!!!

    He doesn't want to be heckled??? Well, I can think of an easy solution for that, SHUT UP and GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!

    Jayelles, I wonder if she does get off on his sick fantasies? I can't read them, they make me ill. The eMails between JMK and Tracey just about sent me over the edge, so I really don't want to read whatever other sick fantasies this creep has!!!!
    If what jameson quoted at Topix is anything to go by, then it is nothing short of pornographic - paedophile porn. This is an adult man sexually fantasising about a 6 year old child.

    Then again - remember that when we heard the audio of the child rape video during the Westerfield trial, jameson dismissed it as "earthy" sex sounds.

    jameson used to post at Purgatory under the hat 3606SUSAN. She didn't make a lot of posts under that hat but she made a couple of interesting ones:-

    From: guestV (3606SUSAN) 3/14/2003 5:04 pm
    To: IVORYTOWER (164 of 262)

    760.164 in reply to 760.163

    Pam goes to Jamesons chat. Jameson just posted a new legal document. Jameson still works for them.
    It's quite odd to read that post knowing that jameson herself posted it. Why would she post that about herself?

    Alas, she hasn't been back to the forum since I posted this:-

    From: Jayelles 5/19/2005 1:50 am
    To: guestV (3606SUSAN) unread (161 of 178)

    2410.161 in reply to 2410.158

    Hi jameson! How's the project going? I was hoping you'd come back to Purgatory so that I could ask you why you posted this:-

    >>Pam goes to Jamesons chat. Jameson just posted a new legal document. Jameson still works for them.

    Were you just "playing" when you posted that or is it a double bluff?

    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  5. #65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle_1
    I wouldn't even go near the double b to check it, tylin. I'll take Jay's word for it.
    Just the mention of this man JMK makes me feel sick.
    Elle_1,
    Don't go over there hon. Another JBR case follower emailed me last night and told me some of what was posted at the bb yesterday. OMG!
    That guy (if he is JMK) is evil! Pure evil! He had the freakin audacity to call JBR something like-his Jonbenet. The same ****** that wrote in an email that he wanted to climb into a casket with a dead child!
    After hearing that I beccame furious!


    ewwwwww sick sick sick Jam's and her followers are deranged for talking to him. They should be ashamed of themselves but they feel no shame. Communicating with a childmolesting freak is ok with them. :bos: :6:

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Texarkana, USA
    Posts
    4,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    If what jameson quoted at Topix is anything to go by, then it is nothing short of pornographic - paedophile porn. This is an adult man sexually fantasising about a 6 year old child.
    I think jameson is quoting from some tapes, not from anything Karr has posted at her site.
    This post, unless it is a legal court document, may not be carried in part, or in its entirety to any other discussion forum or bulletin board without the express written consent of the party who wrote it. It is proprietary to the author and to www.forumsforjustice.org. Violators will be reported to their Internet Service Providers.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    One thing is for sure - she's trying to re-invent history:-

    At Topix she said:-

    I have given Karr an opportunity to post on a forum where members treat all other posters civilly. We did it with Kimberly Ballard and got a lot more truth than any other media did - and I don't regret that. I don't think I will regret this either.
    and this:-

    My membership doesn't engage in namecalling and personal attacks because all that does is chase people off.
    http://www.topix.net/forum/news/jonb...H0IR2JRR5H2/p2

    Yet Kimberley Ballard was run right off their forum with attacks and namecalling etc. To the extent that LP posted this:-


    62 . "I'm embarassed"
    Posted by LovelyPigeon on Nov-08-00 at 08:01 AM (EST)

    that Kim Ballard was treated here like Patsy Ramsey would be by anti-Ramsey posters. She was attacked and attacked before having time to explain.
    I wish she had been given an opportunity to give her story, as she saw fit, and then have us question her about it.
    If anyone wants to read the Kimberley Ballard threads and see how she was treated by this "civil" forum which doesn't "engage in namecalling and personal attacks" then let me know and I will make them available to you (for free :-)).
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  8. #68

    Default

    One poster at the swamp has Karr already saved and a holy man. I'm NOT making this up! She's appalled that a church would deny Karr entry, referencing the Ramseys comments about child killers on their Christian Broadcast Network appearance. Remember? "What if we HAD killed her? Wouldn't we be the very people who need the church most?" (Approx. quote.) That was brought up by the swampster and Karr was all over that one. They'll be comparing halos next.

    Jams did point out that most churches don't want families to run away with an admitted pedophile trolling for their children at their church. No kidding. Guess that wouldn't bother the Ramseys. They relate to Karr, it seems, instead of to parents who want their children safe from such monsters. Wonder why?

    As per usual, some of the swampsters come off as real dummies. Though there are a few challenging Karr. Even jams has smacked him around a little. hahaha Loved that. I'd like to slap him around A LOT. Except he'd probably like it.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  9. #69

    Default

    why_nut's post to jam's over at topix:
    So, to clarify and sum up -- Jameson's Webbsleuths is now for people to post misinformation and be media whores, and the primary value of Karr's membership is to be entertaining and not expose facts.
    http://www.topix.net/forum/news/jonb...OJ8FBJLVR7LLVV

  10. #70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tylin
    why_nut's post to jam's over at topix:


    http://www.topix.net/forum/news/jonb...OJ8FBJLVR7LLVV
    Later in the same thread, Why_Nut responds to Susan Bennett's drivel & rationalizations with another excellent post:

    ----------

    why_nut
    New York, NY


    jameson wrote:
    many things just don't fit -- so I think he is delusional and has convinced himself he is guilty when he is just --- wrong.
    On the other hand, he wants to convince us he DID do this -- and I can't understand why anyone would not want to hear him out. he may just expose something that could solve another crime or protect another child.


    He will not say anything that helps "solve another crime or protect another child." This is fact. Therefore, your only purpose to letting him post on your forum is to allow him to post misinformation and to be a "media whore" who wants to make money off his self-described "manuscript," and who has no interest in truth.

    Perhaps you missed what I had to say in another post on this forum, but you should have it waved in your face every few hours that your beloved and admired Sherry Keene-Osborne would turn her back on you for what you are doing now. Call up Lou Smit today and ask him if he will read what Karr has to say on your forum, and you KNOW that your IP logs will show no visits from him. Call up Ollie Grey and John Agustin and ask them to read what Karr is writing on your forum, and you will similarly see that their IP addresses will not appear. Lou and Ollie and John, even if not in solving JonBenet's murder, all have interests in solving child abuse cases, and not a single one of them will take the words Karr writes that you are publishing and do anything with them, because they know that he is a fraud, and that you are knowingly hosting a fraud.

    (And why would you encourage a close association between yourself and Karr, and encourage his child-abuse fantasies, when you have a grandchild who is of the age Karr find magical, when Karr knows where you live, and when Karr has already demonstrated that he has fantasies of stalking and killing children and your grandchild is as much a target as any other child you claim you might be able to protect by publishing Karr's words?)

    ----------

  11. #71

    Default

    And how about this gem from our beloved KK?!!

    http://www.topix.net/forum/news/jonb...FBJLVR7LLVV/p2

    ----------

    koldkase
    United States


    Okay, why ANY of you would use the name Karr and "innocent" in the same sentence is beyond me. That man did not frolick, molest, and murder JonBnet, but he darn sure has obstructed justice with his mincing words and porno child-raping fantasies for play with Michael Tracey. We know for a fact he kidnapped one 12 year old, as he admits it and married her!

    Not to mention, that filth is anything BUT respectful of JonBenet. If I ever see him in public, I'll slap his face for her. HOW DARE HE PROFANE HER NAME LIKE HE DOES?! After what she went through? HE CALLS HER HIS BELOVED ON YOUR FORUM, JAMS! Pathetic, disgusting, sick, evil wimp!

    Why don't you ask him if he's kidnapped and raped any more 12 year olds lately? He bragged to Tracey he'd kidnap a 12 year old for hours and have "mad, passionate sex" with her. Like he did to his poor "first wife" no doubt, a 12 YEAR OLD CHILD. Why her parents didn't have Karr locked up for that, I will NEVER understand.

    He's on your forum acting all CHRISTIAN, jams. He's no more Christian than the Marquis de Sade. I hope you're planning a real WAKE UP CALL for him after you've had your fun.

    And please don't forget to tell him PATSY NEVER SAW HIS STUPID, LYING LETTERS, EITHER.

    ----------

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    Later in the same thread, Why_Nut responds to Susan Bennett's drivel & rationalizations with another excellent post:

    ----------

    why_nut
    New York, NY


    jameson wrote:
    many things just don't fit -- so I think he is delusional and has convinced himself he is guilty when he is just --- wrong.
    On the other hand, he wants to convince us he DID do this -- and I can't understand why anyone would not want to hear him out. he may just expose something that could solve another crime or protect another child.


    He will not say anything that helps "solve another crime or protect another child." This is fact. Therefore, your only purpose to letting him post on your forum is to allow him to post misinformation and to be a "media whore" who wants to make money off his self-described "manuscript," and who has no interest in truth.

    Perhaps you missed what I had to say in another post on this forum, but you should have it waved in your face every few hours that your beloved and admired Sherry Keene-Osborne would turn her back on you for what you are doing now. Call up Lou Smit today and ask him if he will read what Karr has to say on your forum, and you KNOW that your IP logs will show no visits from him. Call up Ollie Grey and John Agustin and ask them to read what Karr is writing on your forum, and you will similarly see that their IP addresses will not appear. Lou and Ollie and John, even if not in solving JonBenet's murder, all have interests in solving child abuse cases, and not a single one of them will take the words Karr writes that you are publishing and do anything with them, because they know that he is a fraud, and that you are knowingly hosting a fraud.

    (And why would you encourage a close association between yourself and Karr, and encourage his child-abuse fantasies, when you have a grandchild who is of the age Karr find magical, when Karr knows where you live, and when Karr has already demonstrated that he has fantasies of stalking and killing children and your grandchild is as much a target as any other child you claim you might be able to protect by publishing Karr's words?)

    ----------
    I'll raise a glass in toast to Why_Nut. jameson doesn't strike me as someone with the ability to learn from her errors and she'd rather cut off her nose to spite her face than acknowledge that she's wrong IMO.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •