Page 5 of 59 FirstFirst 1234567891555 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 708
  1. #49

    Default

    Thanks for explaining the difference. When cases are under investigation in the U.K., the police release info to the family and the media then?

    The McCanns were on Greta last night and she asked them a few questions which they declined to answer because of the investigation, I got the impression that they may have had the information though and just were told they could not discuss it with the media.

    I am not clear on the layout of the apartment and where the entrance was --- was it out of their eyesight ? Was there only the door or was there a balcony/patio door as well?

  2. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrina
    Thanks for explaining the difference. When cases are under investigation in the U.K., the police release info to the family and the media then?
    Yes, the police in the UK are pretty good at communicating with victims and their familes. The pro judice laws are to prevent a trial by media or for anyting to be published that would jeopardise the trial. Scottish law is different from the law in England and Wales but they are pretty similar in this respect. In Scotland we have a 100 day rule which means that if someone is refused bail, a trial must br brought about within 100 days.

    The McCanns were on Greta last night and she asked them a few questions which they declined to answer because of the investigation, I got the impression that they may have had the information though and just were told they could not discuss it with the media.
    The British detectives who have been working on the case may have communicated stuff to them but asked them not to disclose. The Portugese police are prevented from talking by law so my guess is it's the British investigators who have shared and not the Portugese.


    I am not clear on the layout of the apartment and where the entrance was --- was it out of their eyesight ? Was there only the door or was there a balcony/patio door as well?
    Early reports said the apartment was 200 yards from the restaurant where they ate but it is more like 50-100 yards. These hotel complexes are usually quite similar and comprise of a main building and then a pool with little apartments skirting round the pool. When you book, you often get the choice of a room overlooking the pool or not overlooking the pool. We always choose not overlooking the pool because as in the case of the McCann's hotel, there is often a bar and/or eating place beside the pool for people who don't want to leave the hotel complex for a meal so it can be quite noisy in the evening. The restaurant was just on the other side of the swimming pool from their apartment and they could see their apartment from the restaurant.

    You usually have to go through the hotel to get to the pool area because stealing is a problem in some resorts. People will go out to laze beside the pool and thiefs will go round and steal their purses. However, one of our favourite hotels in Majorca is quite open plan and anyone could wander in off the street to sit by the pool. Having said that, it's a wonderfully safe resort and I've taken the children there on my own without my Hubby and felt absolutely safe. We've never had any bother at that resort. I wouldn't say the same about some of the resorts we've been to in Spain. There were muggings and even a burglary in our hotel and we never left the complex in the evenings. Same in Tenerife - lots of gypsies and thefts. Majorca, Minorca, Cyprus, Portugal ... these are all considered safe places to go on holiday.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  3. #51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    As I recall, the sniffer dog lost the scent at some place which didn't make a lot of sense to me at the time (I don't want to start any rumours by posting what I have in my mind that this was). On reflection, it's possible that there was a vehicle parked at this place and that is why they lost the scent here.
    I read the interview with the man from Scotland Yard a couple of weeks ago, and he said the scent was lost in a market area not far from the hotel. His theory is that Madeleine woke up and left the apartment, wandering into the market area where she was taken by someone who saw her alone. He thinks it was a crime of opportunity.

    The idea of her wandering out of the apartment and not being TAKEN from the apartment has not been as highly publicized, but to me it makes a lot of sense, especially in view of the fact the other two small children were not as well.

  4. #52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    I read the interview with the man from Scotland Yard a couple of weeks ago, and he said the scent was lost in a market area not far from the hotel. His theory is that Madeleine woke up and left the apartment, wandering into the market area where she was taken by someone who saw her alone. He thinks it was a crime of opportunity.

    The idea of her wandering out of the apartment and not being TAKEN from the apartment has not been as highly publicized, but to me it makes a lot of sense, especially in view of the fact the other two small children were not as well.
    Thanks Cherokee for posting this. I have wondered why they seem so certain that someone went to their room and took her, and like you said, the other two were not taken. I know there could be a lot of reasons for this, one that maybe the twins would have been more likely to cry and attract attention.

    If Madeline woke up she many well have decided to look for her parents.

    Little

  5. #53
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    I read the interview with the man from Scotland Yard a couple of weeks ago, and he said the scent was lost in a market area not far from the hotel. His theory is that Madeleine woke up and left the apartment, wandering into the market area where she was taken by someone who saw her alone. He thinks it was a crime of opportunity.

    The idea of her wandering out of the apartment and not being TAKEN from the apartment has not been as highly publicized, but to me it makes a lot of sense, especially in view of the fact the other two small children were not as well.
    That's the one. I didn't read this - it was a telephone interview with a tv presenter. It's the only tme I've heard the suggestion that she wandered off too but I wasn't sure if I'd caught that correctly and I didn't want to post it and maybe spread misinformation. To be honest, I don't know how she'd get out because these apartments tend to have adult height locks. The hotels in Continental Europe must comply with stringent safety and security standards before the British holiday companies like Thomsons and Airtours will use them. What we often find is that the apartment has a card key which opens the door but which also must be inserted into a reader on the wall before the electricity will work. It's a good arrangement. The doors lock automatically when they close and in fact, it's easy to get locked out! Hotels who want to be acredited by British holiday companies often have to spend a lot of money getting up to standard. I'll try to find out if this is a hotel that Thomsons use because they are very picky. If it is, I think we can take it as read that a proper lock would be on the door and that a child of 3 wouldn't be able to reach it.

    The guy from Scotland Yard was also the one who spoke about how rare a stranger/intruder crime was and how the vast majority of child abduction cases were opportunistic. He said that it was such a rare crime that there were probably only about 20 people in the entire UK capable of such a crime.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  6. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    I couldn't find any photos of the hotel rooms which included the entry door into the apartment (I thought this might let us see if she could have reached the door handle).

    However, I did find the interview with the Scotland Yard guy:-

    http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...265416,00.html

    Unfortunately, he said that he thought the case would be solved in a couple of days - and that was nearly 3 weeks ago...
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  7. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearlsim
    Even if Portugal is the safest place on Earth, I can't imagine leaving babies three and under alone and out of earshot, just to go eat out.

    I remember being incensed when I read that the Ramseys left Burke alone while they drove to the hospital for Patsy to deliver JonBenet. Some family member was on the way to babysit, but what if that person had been involved in an accident on the way to the house? It seemed irresponsible to me for parents to go off and leave a young child alone. Not because I want to demonize the Ramseys but that's what I feel in regards to ANY child being left alone, when they are under a certain age.

    I'm not a perfect mom, by any means. But I KNOW that I'd never have been able to be at peace, knowing my children were alone and might wake up and be scared, suddenly get sick and start vomiting..or, as heymom commented in an earlier post, wander off and fall in the pool. Truthfully, it's hard to picture the McCanns having a wonderful, happy, relaxing vacation type of dinner when they knew they'd left babies at "home" to fend for themselves.

    I don't know what the exact layout was of the distance between the resturant where the McCanns dined and the hotel room where they left their children, but no matter how "close" some may argue it is...it was obviously far enough away for someone to enter Maddie's room and snatch her without the parents hearing or seeing anything.

    It was a huge error in judgement. I can be genuinely sorry Maddie was taken, I can hope and pray every day that she comes home safely, but it doesn't change the fact that the parents helped set up the circumstances for their child's abduction.

    What an excellent post Pearlsim. :star3d:

    I do remember reading that the restaurant where the Mccann's ate was more than 2 football fields away from the room where the children slept. The Mccan's were not ignorant. They knew that was too far away for them to see if anyone entered the apartment or the children's room.

    No matter how you look at it they and the other parents who had children in the apartment were negligent. I'm sure the Mccann's have suffered much for that fact. It shows on their faces. I hope and pray Maddy is found but after following child disappearance cases for years, I have little hope there will be a good outcome.

  8. #56

    Default

    An excellent link with excellent pictures of the hotel area, including maps, etc and excellent information about the case and the investigation. It is updated daily.
    (FYI-I found this at the Crimeshots forum.)

    SCROLL TO THE END OF THE PAGE TO SEE THE PICS. They can be enlarged.

    http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/

  9. #57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    To be honest, I don't know how she'd get out because these apartments tend to have adult height locks.
    If the hotel doors are like the ones in the US, the doors automatically lock from the outside and automatically open from the inside. In other words, it would be difficult for someone to enter the hotel room without a room key card, but it would be very easy for a child to exit the room by just pulling on the door handle (which is at the normal door knob height).

    I do not know what kind of door the McCann's hotel room had, but I've read their room was left unlocked, so maybe it was a regular key and lock arrangement, not a card key. Of course, the information regarding the unlocked door may not be accurate as we have heard conflicting reports about the actual evidence in this case.

  10. #58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tylin
    An excellent link with excellent pictures of the hotel area, including maps, etc and excellent information about the case and the investigation. It is updated daily.
    (FYI-I found this at the Crimeshots forum.)

    SCROLL TO THE END OF THE PAGE TO SEE THE PICS. They can be enlarged.

    http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/
    Thanks for the link, Tylin. They say they think she was taken through a window, not a door, and show a photo of the window. I had not heard that theory before.

  11. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    If the hotel doors are like the ones in the US, the doors automatically lock from the outside and automatically open from the inside. In other words, it would be difficult for someone to enter the hotel room without a room key card, but it would be very easy for a child to exit the room by just pulling on the door handle (which is at the normal door knob height).

    I do not know what kind of door the McCann's hotel room had, but I've read their room was left unlocked, so maybe it was a regular key and lock arrangement, not a card key. Of course, the information regarding the unlocked door may not be accurate as we have heard conflicting reports about the actual evidence in this case.
    Door handles in Europe are higher than ours. I have never been in a European hotel with American-style doorknobs. A child of 3 could not reach high enough to open the door on her own.
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  12. #60
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,411

    Default tylin,

    Thanks for that link. A brief study of those photos shows that the McCanns were both out of sight and out of earshot of their three defenseless babes.

    That Nancy Grace is so ignorant on this case. She continues to claim that the parents were "just steps" away from the babies. That's an outrageous lie!
    By some estimates, they were 100 yards away from the apartment, on winding pathways obscured by trees and walls. That's the length of a football field. Waitstaff at Tapas said they never left the table that night during dinner.

    Even "as the crow flies", Tapas is 60 yards from the apartment. The photos show that the apartment was not in a safe enclosed area, but that the window backed on to a small parking lot, separated from a main highway by only a 3 foot high wall.

    Definitely not a safe place to leave three tots unattended.

    These were not parents who went "downstairs" to a dining room in a hotel, leaving three unattended sleeping babes a few stories up. They went entirely out of the apartment building, down and around a couple of roads bordered by heavy brush, all the way to the OTHER side of a swimming pool, to sit and socialize with three other doctor couples, who had ALSO left their babies, all under 3 years of age, alone and unattended.

    And enough already about Mrs. McCann being "naive". She is an emergecy room doctor. She has probably seen a hundred times over what horrible accidents befall unattended children. She is not an eighteen-year-old inexperienced mother.

    Those McCanns make me as ill as the Ramseys did!!



Similar Threads

  1. Madeleine McCann thread?
    By heymom in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: May 19, 2012, 12:40 pm, Sat May 19 12:40:56 UTC 2012
  2. McCann Case Still Unsolved?
    By koldkase in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 518
    Last Post: May 16, 2009, 8:25 am, Sat May 16 8:25:54 UTC 2009
  3. Madeleine McCann - did he or didn't he?
    By Little in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 30, 2007, 12:58 pm, Sun Dec 30 12:58:15 UTC 2007

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •