Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast
Results 109 to 120 of 255
  1. #109
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma.....30 miles from the bombing.
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Oh, Jayelles...I am cracking up right now, I can not breathe.

    You nut....
    Jamie

    Life is a journey, always learning what you can, always loving the best you can and realizing you are never alone.

  2. #110
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    The accusations of baiting when she is asked to produce a source isn't new:-



    If anything, a forum should uphold the requests for sources. Believe me - if roles were reversed and it was TWW1 or Rashie who wasn't producing a source, the others would be pouncing on them and would NOT be accused of baiting. Instead, TWW and Rashie would be disciplined.

    It's just all so.... wrong. It should be a level playing field for intelligent discussion. It would be interesting to see how the discussions would go if the posters names were hidden from all but Admin. There could be no tag teaming then.
    The thread in question has been "cleaned up". Interestingly, the majority of posts that have been deleted have been Daffodil and Whitewitch's for being "off track". More interestingly, LindaA's post where she chastised Daffodil & co for repeatedly asking for sources when E2 was ignoring them was allowed to remain.....Not just that, another post of LindA's where she chastised Daffodil was also allowed to remain. The quote of what daffodil actually said was removed but LindaA's remark "Was that really necessary?" was allowed to remain - leaving what was removed entirely to the imagination.

    What is the purpose of removing posts claiming they are "off track" yet allow posts which are completely unrelated to the topic and which focus only on the posters whose posts have been removed to remain?

    That is blatantly unfair - but then we expected this to happen...
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  3. #111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    The thread in question has been "cleaned up". Interestingly, the majority of posts that have been deleted have been Daffodil and Whitewitch's for being "off track". More interestingly, LindaA's post where she chastised Daffodil & co for repeatedly asking for sources when E2 was ignoring them was allowed to remain.....Not just that, another post of LindA's where she chastised Daffodil was also allowed to remain. The quote of what daffodil actually said was removed but LindaA's remark "Was that really necessary?" was allowed to remain - leaving what was removed entirely to the imagination.

    What is the purpose of removing posts claiming they are "off track" yet allow posts which are completely unrelated to the topic and which focus only on the posters whose posts have been removed to remain?

    That is blatantly unfair - but then we expected this to happen...
    If things go on like that, posters seriously interested in discussing this case will be driven off that forum and it will end up becoming a boring IDI nest where the posters stew in their own juice.


    Whitewitch and Daffodil are very well-informed, fair and polite posters - if I were a forum owner, I'd welcome such people with open arms, no matter which side they are on.
    Last edited by rashomon; February 29, 2008, 2:07 pm at Fri Feb 29 14:07:02 UTC 2008.

  4. #112
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default Rashie

    I have discovered that "Cloaked Shadow" is an anagram of "Whackadoodles" and I think it could be a clue ... because..... a)if Bill McReynolds was indeed a chaos magician then he would have worn a cloak. AND b) he had a shadow.

    I won.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  5. #113

    Default Cloaked Shadow/Whackadoodles connection unraveled!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    I have discovered that "Cloaked Shadow" is an anagram of "Whackadoodles" and I think it could be a clue ... because..... a)if Bill McReynolds was indeed a chaos magician then he would have worn a cloak. AND b) he had a shadow.

    I won.
    Very, very compelling circumstantial evidence I must say. Superb sleuthing, Jay! That Cloaked Shadow - hmm - is definitely a clue imo. We should email Evie about that at once!

    Bill being exposed as the chaos magician would explain the ransom note of course:

    S. B.T.C. means Santa Bill "The ChaosMagician

  6. #114

    Default

    I don't know if I'm seeing things or what, but it looks like the "She saved my soul" thread over at 320Sycamore has been deleted.


    -Tea

  7. #115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icedtea4me
    I don't know if I'm seeing things or what, but it looks like the "She saved my soul" thread over at 320Sycamore has been deleted.

    -Tea
    Good riddance!
    I think it now dawns on the mods too that delusional fanatics can drive a forum against the wall if not reined in, and they have deleted that crazy "She Saved My Soul" thread.

  8. #116
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rashomon
    Good riddance!
    I think it now dawns on the mods too that delusional fanatics can drive a forum against the wall if not reined in, and they have deleted that crazy "She Saved My Soul" thread.
    E2 seems eto be completely missing the point about the deleted posts/threads. She claims that she provided sources for her chaos magic posts but the more important issue is that she did NOT provide a source for her claim that the McReynolds were chaos magic practitioners! That was the crux IMO. She said she had 8 posters on ignore and one has to wonder why because only Eagle seemed to be showing any interest in her posts. Daffodil, Rashie & TWW were responding to them but only to ask her for sources!

    Now she is exhibiing some of the paranoia she demonstrated before her banning from CL - she was suggesting moderator conspiracy and cover-up them too. (And what's with the comment about people not remembering that her hobby is fishing? What's that got to do with the Ramsey case? LOL)

    http://www.boards.320sycamore.com/sh...&postcount=424
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  9. #117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    E2 seems eto be completely missing the point about the deleted posts/threads. She claims that she provided sources for her chaos magic posts but the more important issue is that she did NOT provide a source for her claim that the McReynolds were chaos magic practitioners! That was the crux IMO. She said she had 8 posters on ignore and one has to wonder why because only Eagle seemed to be showing any interest in her posts. Daffodil, Rashie & TWW were responding to them but only to ask her for sources!

    Now she is exhibiing some of the paranoia she demonstrated before her banning from CL - she was suggesting moderator conspiracy and cover-up them too. (And what's with the comment about people not remembering that her hobby is fishing? What's that got to do with the Ramsey case? LOL)

    http://www.boards.320sycamore.com/sh...&postcount=424
    I think E2 used the fishing hobby comparison to point out that she will 'fish for' info on the boards also (dig out old posts, etc.). It was something like a threat on her part ("Be careful! For I will fish out stuff!").
    Eve offers an interesting psycological study: she can't bear anyone disagreeing with her and throws a fit whenever this happens.
    Quite ironic isn't it, that people like Eve vehemently deny Patsy Ramsey could ever have flown off the handle, while at the same time she herself publicly flies off the handle all the time over simple disagreements on a message board.

    If Eve could, she would not only put posters on ignore, but also the evidence against the Ramseys.

    And in a way, she does that by constructing her delusional 'Bill and Janet did it' universe instead.
    Interesting that Eve has now begun lashing out at the moderators too, the same Athena and Freshwater she held in such high esteem only a few weeks ago because she believed she would be given free rein by them to post her stuff on Sycamore.
    I hope the mods on 320S are aware that Eve has thrown down the gauntlet - imo she clearly wants to start a power struggle over who calls the shots on that board. And from what I know about Eve, she needs more than having her stuff softly and quietly deleted without getting any warnings or infraction points, and demurely explained to her why this has been done. Eve will merely interpret this as weakness on the moderators' part.

    Imo Eve needs a hard slap on the wrist, with the mods telling her in no uncertain terms who is in charge there and that she has to follow the rules, and if she doesn't, she will have to bear the consequences. If this isn't done, it is the board which will pay the price, not Eve, for types like her are going to find enough other 'virtual meadows' on the net on which to deposit their 'delusional mental manure' on.

    It is up to you now, mods on 320S!

    S. B .T. C. (Stop Buying That Cr*p) coming from E2. It is not Santa Bill, but E2 who is the 'chaos magician' here! If you don't react now, that board will attract other 'chaos magicians' faster than you can push all those 'delete' buttons to remove threads and posts!
    Last edited by rashomon; March 3, 2008, 4:19 pm at Mon Mar 3 16:19:03 UTC 2008.

  10. #118
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rashomon
    I think E2 used the fishing hobby comparison to point out that she will 'fish for' info on the boards also (dig out old posts, etc.). It was something like a threat on her part ("Be careful! For I will fish out stuff!").
    Eve offers an interesting psycological study: she can't bear anyone disagreeing with her and throws a fit whenever this happens.
    Quite ironic isn't it, that people like Eve vehemently deny Patsy Ramsey could ever have flown off the handle, while at the same time she herself publicly flies off the handle all the time over simple disagreements on a message board.

    If Eve could, she would not only put posters on ignore, but also the evidence against the Ramseys.

    And in a way, she does that by constructing her delusional 'Bill and Janet did it' universe instead.
    Interesting that Eve has now begun lashing out at the moderators too, the same Athena and Freshwater she held in such high esteem only a few weeks ago because she believed she would be given free rein by them to post her stuff on Sycamore.
    I hope the mods on 320S are aware that Eve has thrown down the gauntlet - imo she clearly wants to start a power struggle over who calls the shots on that board. And from what I know about Eve, she needs more than having her stuff softly and quietly deleted without getting any warnings, and demurely explained to her why this has been done. Eve will merely interpret this as weakness on the moderators' part.

    Imo Eve needs a hard slap on the wrist, with the mods telling her in no uncertain terms who is in charge there and that she has to follow the rules, and if she doesn't, she will have to bear the consequences. If this isn't done, it is the board which will pay the price, not Eve, for types like her are going to find enough other 'virtual meadows' on the net on which to deposit their 'delusional mental manure' on.

    It is up to you now, mods on 320S!

    S. B .T. C. (Stop Buying That Cr*p) coming from E2. It is not Santa Bill, but E2 who is the 'chaos magician' here! If you don't react now, that board will attract other 'chaos magicians' faster than you can push all those 'delete' buttons to remove threads and posts!
    You are right about it being the board which will pay the price. The most interesting and lively discussions take place when there is polite input from both sides. That will NEVER happen as long as the Mod is one-sided.

    I note that YET AGAIN, Athena has deleted an RDI post but allowed her IDI buddy posts which quote it and chastise it to remain. The JBR case is a highly emotive topic and there will always be "sides". Members need to have confidence that the Mods are going to treat everyone fairly and equally and that just ain't happening at Sycamore.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  11. #119

    Default

    Well, it appears the worm has turned:

    Freshwater
    Admin Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 312
    Blog Entries: 6

    Wow this exchange makes me believe that we shouldn't discuss this case at all since it seems many of you are not capable of doing so in a civil manner. Perhaps you all have been talking about this case for so long with each other that you cannot get over past differences with each other? Maybe that is why it becomes personal?

    [snip]

    So it is really up to you all to come together and work it out. If you cannot - the conversation will be over because as a fledging community we just don't have the resources to police you all.

    Thanks
    Fresh

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  12. #120
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    You are right about it being the board which will pay the price. The most interesting and lively discussions take place when there is polite input from both sides. That will NEVER happen as long as the Mod is one-sided.

    I note that YET AGAIN, Athena has deleted an RDI post but allowed her IDI buddy posts which quote it and chastise it to remain. The JBR case is a highly emotive topic and there will always be "sides". Members need to have confidence that the Mods are going to treat everyone fairly and equally and that just ain't happening at Sycamore.
    Looking at your new photo I'm inspired - maybe SBTC means "stalked by the cat."
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!



Similar Threads

  1. FOFLMAO, comic relief from whackadoodles Evening2
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 21, 2006, 10:58 am, Mon Aug 21 10:58:43 UTC 2006
  2. CS Relief Thread
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: September 2, 2004, 5:26 pm, Thu Sep 2 17:26:39 UTC 2004
  3. New 911 Update Thread 2
    By Twitch in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: April 10, 2004, 12:28 pm, Sat Apr 10 12:28:10 UTC 2004

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •