Whackadoodle Evening2 - THREAD #2

Discussion in 'Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum' started by Moab, Jan 31, 2008.

  1. Moab

    Moab Admin Staff Member

    I closed the other thread and opened this one with this stunning post:





     
  2. Jayelles

    Jayelles Alert Viewer in Scotland

    It is my opinion that a case could be built against anyone using E2's logic and standards of "evidence".

    There is not one shred of court-admissable evidence in her theory.
     
  3. Watching You

    Watching You Superior Bee Admin

    E2 = Code 6 Wingnut

    otherwise

    known

    as

    loony.

    I think it would be fun to start a thread listing all the C6WNs we've come to know over the years.

    Let's see - E2, jameson, mame, NK - just to name a few.
     
  4. Jayelles

    Jayelles Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Freefalling aka .... several dozen alters.
     
  5. Watching You

    Watching You Superior Bee Admin

    Candy

    Morgan

    Horace Mills

    Mary 99 (whatever happened to her? Wingnuts don't go away, they just morph into a different hat.)
     
  6. Little

    Little Member

    I honestly had to read this a few time...

    Amazing. As opposed to Lou Smit's "opinion" that the Ramseys were just not the type of people who would do this. Just amazing.

    Sigh - I'm not even going to go down that road.

    Little
     
  7. The Punisher

    The Punisher Member

    You need a totally different class for that one, WY!
     
  8. sboyd

    sboyd Member

    Now I understand a little better when a detective says we had every lunatic in the country calling us with "I know who did it". :video:
     
  9. Watching You

    Watching You Superior Bee Admin

    E2 is beyond stupid. She's so stupid she doesn't even understand the arguments that make her theory nigh to impossible.

    Why bother? She's just another loony.
     
  10. Jayelles

    Jayelles Alert Viewer in Scotland

    I have to say that all that interests me is:-

    1) whether there is forensic evidence linking a suspect to the crime and then...
    2) whether the person had means, motive and opportunity

    I think that to obsess about someone's 30+ year old writing and their lives 30/40/50/60/70 years ago is akin to stalking that person.

    OTOH, if we were talking about a proven murderer, then it might be interesting to find out what made him/her tick - what kind of childhood did he/she have etc etc. But not about someone whose only apparent crimes seems to have been a love of the limelight and an interest in gay porn?
     
  11. heymom

    heymom Member

    And if the McReynolds are so psychopathic, why have they never committed any other crimes, either before or since? Preposterous.
     
  12. koldkase

    koldkase FFJ Senior Member


    Okay, I hate to ask...gay porn? Are you saying there is proof McReynolds was interested in gay porn? I remember that John Ramsey tried to paint McReynolds as gay, though it would seem to me that would be an argument McReynolds DIDN'T commit this crime, as the molestation of JonBenet would have involved a PEDOPHILE, not someone who is gay.

    Anyhow, I know E2 has painted the McReynolds with every imagined "sin" she can connect in her disconnected brain, but never heard of any legit connection to "gay porn". Just wondering about your statement on that.
     
  13. koldkase

    koldkase FFJ Senior Member

    No kidding. The problem with ALL of these wingnutz is they invariably have NO CONCEPT of what "evidence" is. Astrology charts, numerology, psychic readings, visions, and "Nancy said it" are NOT evidence. They just aren't, they never will be, and thank god for that.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2008
  14. Jayelles

    Jayelles Alert Viewer in Scotland

    I don't think the gay porn thing came from the Ramseys. I know John Ramsey described him as effeminate, but I understand that Bill McReynold's visits to shops which specialise in pornography involving adult males came out during the investigation.

    This isn't something that I had any particular interest in and I wouldn't have paid the slightest interest in it at all if it weren't for the fact that some members of the doubleBB "misrepresented" the situation and implied that it was kiddie porn. A discussion then developed and followed along these lines until jameson *eventually* intervened and corrected it:-

    http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=56&forum=DCForumID79

    It's a "so what?" for me. Lots of men swing both ways including some very macho historical figures. It doesn't make them likely child molesters - in fact, I believe it may be quite the opposite.
     
  15. Jayelles

    Jayelles Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Hallelujah.
     
  16. Paradox

    Paradox Banned for Stupidity by RiverRat

    Stunningly obtuse that is.
     
  17. icedtea4me

    icedtea4me Member

    And let's not forget those inane anagrams. Yeah, I can just see it now...

    Prosecutor: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, here is JonBenet's astrological chart. Here, transiting Neptune is now opposing her natal Jupiter. Now I know that Jupiter opposing Neptune can have hundreds of interpretations, but the only one it can possibly mean is for JonBenet to be aware of deceptive college professors. And that can only mean one person... Bill McReynolds!"


    -Tea
     
  18. heymom

    heymom Member

    Deceptive college professors...hmmm...Like Michael Tracey???
     
  19. icedtea4me

    icedtea4me Member

    Did you not hear what the prosecutor said? There's only one deceptive college professor and that's Bill McReynolds.


    -Tea
     
  20. heymom

    heymom Member

    Oh, dear! You are RIGHT! I meant "evil college professors!" Within that category, Michael Tracey has the lead all sewn up.

    :bigstick:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice