Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 255
  1. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sboyd
    Now I understand a little better when a detective says we had every lunatic in the country calling us with "I know who did it".
    No kidding. The problem with ALL of these wingnutz is they invariably have NO CONCEPT of what "evidence" is. Astrology charts, numerology, psychic readings, visions, and "Nancy said it" are NOT evidence. They just aren't, they never will be, and thank god for that.
    Last edited by koldkase; February 2, 2008, 12:24 pm at Sat Feb 2 12:24:23 UTC 2008.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  2. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase
    Okay, I hate to ask...gay porn? Are you saying there is proof McReynolds was interested in gay porn? I remember that John Ramsey tried to paint McReynolds as gay, though it would seem to me that would be an argument McReynolds DIDN'T commit this crime, as the molestation of JonBenet would have involved a PEDOPHILE, not someone who is gay.

    Anyhow, I know E2 has painted the McReynolds with every imagined "sin" she can connect in her disconnected brain, but never heard of any legit connection to "gay porn". Just wondering about your statement on that.
    I don't think the gay porn thing came from the Ramseys. I know John Ramsey described him as effeminate, but I understand that Bill McReynold's visits to shops which specialise in pornography involving adult males came out during the investigation.

    This isn't something that I had any particular interest in and I wouldn't have paid the slightest interest in it at all if it weren't for the fact that some members of the doubleBB "misrepresented" the situation and implied that it was kiddie porn. A discussion then developed and followed along these lines until jameson *eventually* intervened and corrected it:-

    http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/d...um=DCForumID79

    It's a "so what?" for me. Lots of men swing both ways including some very macho historical figures. It doesn't make them likely child molesters - in fact, I believe it may be quite the opposite.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase
    No kidding. The problem with ALL of these wingnutz is they invariabley have NO CONCEPT of what "evidence" is. Astrology charts, numerology, psychic readings, visions, and "Nancy said it" are NOT evidence. They just aren't, they never will be, and thank god for that.
    Hallelujah.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  4. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Not Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    840

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moab
    I closed the other thread and opened this one with this stunning post:
    Stunningly obtuse that is.

  5. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koldkase
    No kidding. The problem with ALL of these wingnutz is they invariabley have NO CONCEPT of what "evidence" is. Astrology charts, numerology, psychic readings, visions, and "Nancy said it" are NOT evidence. They just aren't, they never will be, and thank god for that.
    And let's not forget those inane anagrams. Yeah, I can just see it now...

    Prosecutor: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, here is JonBenet's astrological chart. Here, transiting Neptune is now opposing her natal Jupiter. Now I know that Jupiter opposing Neptune can have hundreds of interpretations, but the only one it can possibly mean is for JonBenet to be aware of deceptive college professors. And that can only mean one person... Bill McReynolds!"


    -Tea

  6. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icedtea4me
    And let's not forget those inane anagrams. Yeah, I can just see it now...

    Prosecutor: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, here is JonBenet's astrological chart. Here, transiting Neptune is now opposing her natal Jupiter. Now I know that Jupiter opposing Neptune can have hundreds of interpretations, but the only one it can possibly mean is for JonBenet to be aware of deceptive college professors. And that can only mean one person... Bill McReynolds!"


    -Tea
    Deceptive college professors...hmmm...Like Michael Tracey???
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  7. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heymom
    Deceptive college professors...hmmm...Like Michael Tracey???
    Did you not hear what the prosecutor said? There's only one deceptive college professor and that's Bill McReynolds.


    -Tea

  8. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Oh, dear! You are RIGHT! I meant "evil college professors!" Within that category, Michael Tracey has the lead all sewn up.

    :bigstick:
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  9. #21

    Default

    Good. Lord. That thread you linked to, Jayelles, appears to me to name McReynold's having an interest in "gay" pornography "a secret", which jams now is OUTING. And what is the SOURCE for this SECRET? I don't see one named...just JAMS.

    Sorry, I'm not using jams' GOSSIP as a source for anything but RST GOSSIP.

    I'm still reading, but that is one doozer of a thread, so maybe I'll find a "source" other than the sudden left turn of the RST NOW ATTACKING MCREYNOLDS...again.

    I thought mBm thought Karr was in on it with JAR or his friends? Last time I looked? So how did this certainty that McReynolds is THE PERP change without so much as a "clearing" by jams? Maybe I'm getting mBm mixed up with the rest of the RST there--so many wingnutz, so little time.... But in this thread Don Bradley, who loathes to name ANYONE a suspect other than mentally ill Oliva as "church mouse", is going with the McReynolds flow.

    Oh wait, Karr showed up at the swamp as their STAR PERVERT after this, didn't he?

    Well, I'm sure whackadoodles was in heaven. Seems she'd turned the worm, and they were all jumping on the "McReynolds did it" band wagon. Truly pathetic. AGAIN, his DNA did NOT match, but oh well, he had that FOREIGN FACTION with him, so no prob....

    Where are they on this now? E2 left in a huff after jams said don't turn every thread into McReynold's did it. Karr came and went last year. Now E2 is back. Mame is back, too. What's the code six count there now?

    What a bunch of total idiots.
    Last edited by koldkase; February 2, 2008, 1:29 pm at Sat Feb 2 13:29:09 UTC 2008.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  10. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Texarkana, USA
    Posts
    4,301

    Default

    Who knew E2 had published hundreds of articles and is known by her real name throughout the world? Heh. I sure didn't. She posted this at CL recently.

    "I forgot to add, Jayelles. I TOO have published hundreds of articles all of which used the same name, my REAL name. I'm known BY that name throughout the world and had NO reason whatsoever to use another."


    This post, unless it is a legal court document, may not be carried in part, or in its entirety to any other discussion forum or bulletin board without the express written consent of the party who wrote it. It is proprietary to the author and to www.forumsforjustice.org. Violators will be reported to their Internet Service Providers.

  11. #23

    Default

    Well, the suspense is nail-biting.

    Does she mean she published hundreds of articles...online? If that's the standard of "publishing" she means, we've all published tens of thousands of "articles" online.

    Or does she mean academic articles? Hm. Now what oh what is her area of specialty? Conspiracy theories? Or just libeling the McReynolds endlessly?

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  12. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Texarkana, USA
    Posts
    4,301

    Default

    She certainly doesn't seem to want "that name" linked to her screen name.


    I'm known BY that name throughout the world and had NO reason whatsoever to use another."
    This post, unless it is a legal court document, may not be carried in part, or in its entirety to any other discussion forum or bulletin board without the express written consent of the party who wrote it. It is proprietary to the author and to www.forumsforjustice.org. Violators will be reported to their Internet Service Providers.



Similar Threads

  1. FOFLMAO, comic relief from whackadoodles Evening2
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 21, 2006, 10:58 am, Mon Aug 21 10:58:43 UTC 2006
  2. CS Relief Thread
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: September 2, 2004, 5:26 pm, Thu Sep 2 17:26:39 UTC 2004
  3. New 911 Update Thread 2
    By Twitch in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: April 10, 2004, 12:28 pm, Sat Apr 10 12:28:10 UTC 2004

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •