Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 62

Thread: Linda Arndt

  1. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    I can't bring myself to read DOI; I have read just about every other book on the case. If Arndt wrote a book, I'd read it, even if it was pro-R.
    Yes, I, too, would love to read anything written by any of the R friends who were called to the home that morning. I's REALLY love to read what housekeeper LHP has to say; I now she tried to write a book, but was stopped by the R lawyers. I don't know how- anyone has the right to write a book, especially about public case. As long as what she writes was either her opinion of the truth, she can't be stopped. The RST can sue (as they did with ST) or threaten to sue, but if she's not printing lies, they can't stop her. But someone like LHP wouldn't have the financial resources to defend herself legally, so that would be a deterrent right there. That's a good example of how wealth can prevent someone from being held accountable for a serious crime and at the same time, stop the less wealthy from being heard.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  2. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee
    I can't bring myself to read DOI; I have read just about every other book on the case. If Arndt wrote a book, I'd read it, even if it was pro-R.
    Yes, I, too, would love to read anything written by any of the R friends who were called to the home that morning. I's REALLY love to read what housekeeper LHP has to say; I now she tried to write a book, but was stopped by the R lawyers. I don't know how- anyone has the right to write a book, especially about public case. As long as what she writes was either her opinion of the truth, she can't be stopped. The RST can sue (as they did with ST) or threaten to sue, but if she's not printing lies, they can't stop her. But someone like LHP wouldn't have the financial resources to defend herself legally, so that would be a deterrent right there. That's a good example of how wealth can prevent someone from being held accountable for a serious crime and at the same time, stop the less wealthy from being heard.

    Hi DeeDee, I think the reason she canceled her book was because she would have to write what she testified to in the Grand Jury and she's not allowed to talk about it. So, no book. I think she even went to court to get them to drop the secrecy so she could write about her experiences but they said no. That is probably the resaon Linda A. hasn't come out with her book. It would be very hard for somone who testified at the Grand Jury to write a book and actually say anything interesting that anyone might want to read. Thats JMO.

    Oh and you've just GOT to read DOI. It's a very important piece of this puzzle. It will blow you away! (you don't have to buy it, I can send you mine.)

  3. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    What a kind offer. Actually, they have it in my local Barnes & Nobel. But I won't spend good money on it; I'll just have a frappachino in the cafe while I read a chapter at a time when I make my weekly visit to the store.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  4. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    3,481

    Default

    Look for it in thrift stores and used book stores, or garage sales. I frequently find copies of all the books about JonBenet in Half Price Books. In fact, if anyone needs another copy of PMPT, or Steve's book, I can watch out for one. Usually about $6 or less.
    "We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis

    MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!

  5. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karen
    Hi DeeDee, I think the reason she canceled her book was because she would have to write what she testified to in the Grand Jury and she's not allowed to talk about it. So, no book. I think she even went to court to get them to drop the secrecy so she could write about her experiences but they said no. That is probably the resaon Linda A. hasn't come out with her book. It would be very hard for somone who testified at the Grand Jury to write a book and actually say anything interesting that anyone might want to read. Thats JMO.

    Oh and you've just GOT to read DOI. It's a very important piece of this puzzle. It will blow you away! (you don't have to buy it, I can send you mine.)
    Actually the Judge has given the witnesses permission to speak about their secret testimony.

    http://www.rense.com/general11/benet.htm

  6. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AMES
    Actually the Judge has given the witnesses permission to speak about their secret testimony.

    http://www.rense.com/general11/benet.htm
    When was that written? Recently? I hope so- I can't wait to see what comes out of it.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  7. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee
    When was that written? Recently? I hope so- I can't wait to see what comes out of it.
    No, not recently. It was written June 6, 2001. I just found it over at Topix, so I imagine that the posters that post here and also over there...read about it 7 years ago!

  8. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    I thought that date at the top indicated 2001...so in the past 7 years no one has taken the judge up on that. The R lawyers must have gotten to every person on that Grand Jury. They've already gotten to LHP.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  9. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee
    I thought that date at the top indicated 2001...so in the past 7 years no one has taken the judge up on that. The R lawyers must have gotten to every person on that Grand Jury. They've already gotten to LHP.
    I know..that is just strange. Looks like someone would have taken him up on that, long before now. I believe that the Ramsey's have and still have...."people". If you know what I mean...

  10. #34

    Default

    Thank you Ames. I didn't know about that. Well the the only answer has to be that because the Ramseys sue everyone who writes a book and win, except for the FOX suit, it has intimidated everyone. Linn Wood is a bully and he threatens everyone. I remember once Dominic Dunn wouldn't even discuss the Ramsey case on LKL because he said they're just suing everybody. I don't know legal things but I wonder if JR wins the election would he then not be able to sue someone for writing a book about the case?

  11. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karen
    Thank you Ames. I didn't know about that. Well the the only answer has to be that because the Ramseys sue everyone who writes a book and win, except for the FOX suit, it has intimidated everyone. Linn Wood is a bully and he threatens everyone. I remember once Dominic Dunn wouldn't even discuss the Ramsey case on LKL because he said they're just suing everybody. I don't know legal things but I wonder if JR wins the election would he then not be able to sue someone for writing a book about the case?
    You are welcome. Yep...I agree...I think that everybody is just afraid of being sued.

  12. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AMES
    You are welcome. Yep...I agree...I think that everybody is just afraid of being sued.
    It's the THREAT of being sued thats stops people, too. I was under the impression that you can't be sued for saying or writing anything that is true. So my guess would be that, as the only eyewitness(s) were also the killer/stager(s) that no one can really say or write the whole truth, but only opinions (which are also protected). Unless someone states a complete lie, even of they were sued, they'd win the case, but of course, at their own-possibly great- expense.
    This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.



Similar Threads

  1. Linda Arndt Deposition - March 8, 2000
    By Tricia in forum Transcripts: Ramsey murder case
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: September 27, 2010, 11:18 am, Mon Sep 27 11:18:22 UTC 2010
  2. Linda Arndt speaks (with forked tongue)
    By Watching You in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: June 29, 2006, 1:28 pm, Thu Jun 29 13:28:05 UTC 2006
  3. Globe and Linda Arndt/FFJ Article
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: December 10, 2004, 11:17 pm, Fri Dec 10 23:17:49 UTC 2004
  4. Linda Arndt's Deposition
    By Tricia in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: October 26, 2004, 11:32 pm, Tue Oct 26 23:32:36 UTC 2004
  5. RMN - Arndt Appeal
    By RiverRat in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 9, 2003, 3:28 am, Fri May 9 3:28:26 UTC 2003

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •