With all this DNA speak it came to me that somewhere deep in my memory banks (which are way overdrawn), there was, if remembering correctly, an UNFLUSHED toilet at the Ramsey house. I don't remember which toilet, but remember it was quite the talk at the time it was made public. Since I have NEVER heard it mentioned again, and since all the DNA talk is the current topic, do we know: Was it tested? Who did the contents of the unflushed toilet belong to? Where was this toilet? Is this one of those tidbits not yet released to the public? One would assume the contents of that unflushed toilet belonged to someone in the family. If not, one would hope that those contents were tested; plenty of DNA in there. If tested and it was NOT Ramsey, we would have heard that over and over again, so must we assume that the contents were Ramsey? Anyone remember or know?
I have wondered about this also. I THINK that Patsy said that one of Burke's friends had a bad habit of not flushing. I will have to go back and re-read her 98 interview.
Barbara, I seem to remember something about that too and can not remember where I read it. This is all I could find.
I do recall that "material from toilet" was taken into evidence. I remember reading about that unflushed toilet, and I think it was the one in JBR's bathroom.
Try this- scroll down- it's midway down the page on the Dec. 27th Page 6. http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-inventory.htm
Thank you all. I see they took liquid from the toilet, toilet tissue and the toilet seat itself. Also, some mention of the pipes themselves Are we to assume that all materials found belonged to JonBenet or one of the Ramseys? So if it all belonged to Ramsey, HENCE, once again, NO evidence of an intruder who by some accounts, wandered the house for hours to understand the layout yet never needed a restroom. Just one of the test results we never heard about. When that happens, it just tells me that ONLY Ramsey evidence was found.
Yes, Barbara- I agree. I think that is also the case with a LOT of the information about the case, anything that implicates the Rs is kept quiet, not released to the public. A "lie of omission", if you will.