Results 13 to 24 of 138
Thread: Hi-Tec crime scene photos
-
September 29, 2009, 10:38 pm, Tue Sep 29 22:38:15 UTC 2009 #13
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
Depending on how this is going to be arranged. I see a child's footprints, plus the sole of an adult's boot or shoe(?). I also see Hi Tech imprinted from the sole of Hi Tech boots.
I do remember them talking about Burke having a pair of these Hi Tech boots, but what would be the significance of these?
Before the Ramseys moved into their home,many workmen were walking all over this house and probably in the basement, and I'm sure with wet cement around footprints must have been found, but it appears JonBenét and Burke may well have been playing down there at one time; who knows (?) maybe with wet cement, but I hardly think this would have been Christmas night(?)
Another odd thing which strikes me is the different colour of the child's shoe prints from a normal concrete impression (?). Have these been outlined in any way with photography die to make them stand out, or, are these the original shoe prints?Last edited by Elle_1; September 29, 2009, 11:53 pm at Tue Sep 29 23:53:43 UTC 2009.
elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
October 1, 2009, 7:58 am, Thu Oct 1 7:58:31 UTC 2009 #14
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
-
October 1, 2009, 3:43 pm, Thu Oct 1 15:43:00 UTC 2009 #15It's probably too late to get justice for JonBenét. Maybe it always was. But knowing where things went wrong is the first step to not going there again. **-- Alan Prendergast-Dec 21, 2006--**
______________________
Bring all our Missing Home www.usearchut.org
Prayers for our military who are protecting our freedom.
-
October 2, 2009, 9:55 pm, Fri Oct 2 21:55:45 UTC 2009 #16
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- In the Federal Witness Protection Program
- Posts
- 1,311
I thought that Hi-Tec print was left in the white mold on the floor, not in what was once wet cement.
That places it as recently left. Patsy had already admitted that she was in that room to wrap presents (didn't happen, believe me) and that LHP and her husband removed decorations and Christmas trees from that room. So several people walked around that room before the murder. If BR had left that print earlier, it would have been obliterated by that morning. No...that print was left at the time of the crime.This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.
-
October 2, 2009, 10:28 pm, Fri Oct 2 22:28:07 UTC 2009 #17
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
October 3, 2009, 7:26 pm, Sat Oct 3 19:26:19 UTC 2009 #18
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- In the Federal Witness Protection Program
- Posts
- 1,311
I don't think the kids were playing in that room at all. It was filthy, and not really much in there to play with. Paint cans, window screens, etc. There was mention of a small, bare child's footprint in the room also, but I have not seem were LE pushed forward with that, so I don't think it was true. If so, the coroner would have seen that white mold on the bottom of JB's bare feet at autopsy. It was not noted. And of course, her bare foot would have been matched to that print.
This is my Constitutionally protected OPINION. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.
-
October 5, 2009, 8:56 am, Mon Oct 5 8:56:37 UTC 2009 #19
Hey, Peeps. Just wanted to drop in quickly and say sorry I haven't been able to work on the photo collection project. Yes, I had some other stuff that came up, and today is busy, as well, but I will get to it as soon as I can.
"University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
FF: WRKJB?
-
October 5, 2009, 9:27 am, Mon Oct 5 9:27:30 UTC 2009 #20
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
I know what it's like trying to organize my own photos on my pc, and it is very time consuming transferring them to CD's etc. One needs a lot of time KK. You need a personal secretary for this huge task!
elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
October 5, 2009, 9:33 am, Mon Oct 5 9:33:18 UTC 2009 #21
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
It's more than obvious in the photos the "visible prints" were made by a child wearing shoes and not bare footed. They could have been there for a long time. I point blank refuse to believe Patsy Ramsey traipsed down to this basement room and wrapped her Christmas gifts there. Many of us don't believe this ever happened.elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
October 5, 2009, 9:02 pm, Mon Oct 5 21:02:43 UTC 2009 #22
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- In the Federal Witness Protection Program
- Posts
- 1,311
-
December 30, 2009, 1:12 pm, Wed Dec 30 13:12:42 UTC 2009 #23
I found a photo of the kind of Hi-Tec boots I think that Burke had: Columbus Hi-Tec boots. Note the compass on the laces. These boots are a size 4, about the size a sixth-grader might wear.
-
December 30, 2009, 1:30 pm, Wed Dec 30 13:30:23 UTC 2009 #24
Wow. Did we ever mention that you are awesome, fr brown? Well, just in case...YOU ARE AWESOME!!
Did you find those on ebay? Any way to date them?
I know way back when, lots of us looked high and low for photos of those boots. If you can date this pair, you may have provided us with the answer to a long time issue used by Team Ramsey to "prove" they had an intruder, no matter how many impeccable sources we provide for Burke and others in their immediate family/friend circle having owned Hi-Tecs.
"University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
FF: WRKJB?
Similar Threads
-
What do you see in JBR crime scene photos?
By INSIGHT in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 119Last Post: November 12, 2006, 3:50 pm, Sun Nov 12 15:50:34 UTC 2006 -
Crime scene pics--again
By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 25Last Post: August 5, 2006, 5:10 pm, Sat Aug 5 17:10:00 UTC 2006 -
Crime scene photos - Steven Jones - GRAPHIC CONTENT
By Moab in forum FIRE-In-The-HOLEReplies: 7Last Post: June 13, 2006, 9:06 am, Tue Jun 13 9:06:42 UTC 2006