While looking at the Stephany Flores case links in the latest Joran Van Der Sloot saga I came across a crime scene photo of a small abrasion under Stephany's chin. IMO it looks exactly like those abrasions on JonBenet that Lou Smit claimed were made by a stun gun. I would like to know if anyone else thinks the abrasion under Stephany's chin resembles those on JonBenet's body. I never believed the stun gun theory on JonBenet, and I have never heard it mentioned that Joran used a stun gun on Stephany or even had one available to him. I would love to know what causes those marks and put that stun gun theory to rest once and for all. http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10003848-2.html?tag=page
graphic photos Here is the link to photos of the marks on JonBenet that resemble the one under Stephany's chin. http://crimeshots.com/CrimeScene1.html
Yes, it does look like the same, small round "abrasion". What a pity the coroner didn't so a more thorough job of determining if they WERE stun gun marks. What a pity the DA didn't have the guts to order an exhumation (after the parents refused) to be sure. At that point, it could have been done. Stun guns make an electrical burn on the skin- very different from a typical abrasion, very different from a cigarette burn (which also makes a small, round mark).
I can't find the photo of Stephanys chin. What number is the picture? ok, gosh I'm sorry. I just went back and looked again and it is photo number 1. For some reason the site started me out with number 2 and I didn't see it. And yes, I agree. It does look the same. I wish the photo was more detailed though. I know Jonbenets wasn't a burn but we can see Joran and Stephany had cigarettes so if we had a clearer picture we might be able to see if it is different , as in a burn from a cigarrette, than an abrasion or stun gun burn.
I didn't see that. It looks like it could be a charm from a necklace or something like that. How sad.