Results 25 to 36 of 42
-
October 25, 2010, 10:16 pm, Mon Oct 25 22:16:40 UTC 2010 #25
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- In the Federal Witness Protection Program
- Posts
- 1,311
-
October 26, 2010, 12:27 am, Tue Oct 26 0:27:06 UTC 2010 #26
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 8,381
Ditto! ALL OF THE ABOVE!
ex D.A. Mary Lacy will never live down being the No.1 idiot of the year when it comes to the fiasco of the John Mark Carr story. When is the movie being made?
elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
Just my opinion.
-
October 26, 2010, 2:22 pm, Tue Oct 26 14:22:54 UTC 2010 #27
I'm voting "All of the above."
Incompetent and corrupt is implied in "Bought off" and "A complete idiot", right?
"University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
FF: WRKJB?
-
October 27, 2010, 5:20 pm, Wed Oct 27 17:20:17 UTC 2010 #28
FFJ Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 2,096
Dee, Elle and KK...you got me. I have to agree...give me a D!
Lacy is...
A: Bought off
B: A complete idiot
C: Desperate for media attention
D: All of the above
3 for All of the above....and I'd like to change my vote. Make it 4 for all of the above.
-
October 28, 2010, 8:03 pm, Thu Oct 28 20:03:38 UTC 2010 #29
Poster of the EON - Fabulous Inimitable Transcript and Book Reviewer
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,435
You can have an agenda--say, for arguments sake--clearing the Ramseys because people in your political party are connected through business deals. That would be self-interest bordering on evil. But picking someone like Karr to pin it on? That is PURE STUPID. The sad thing is so much of the press immediately picked up on it and made it real.
-
October 29, 2010, 5:34 pm, Fri Oct 29 17:34:48 UTC 2010 #30
"University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
FF: WRKJB?
-
July 31, 2012, 1:19 pm, Tue Jul 31 13:19:01 UTC 2012 #31
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 650
I'm bumping this since I didn't want to start a new thread on this topic. I hope this wasn't addressed somewhere on one of threads concerning Kolar's book but:
Since Kolar was present at the cold case task force assembled after Garnett handed the case back to Boulder police, and since Kolar presented his theory,
can we conclude that Boulder police wanted to question Burke because of what Kolar presented?
-
July 31, 2012, 1:56 pm, Tue Jul 31 13:56:54 UTC 2012 #32
-
July 31, 2012, 4:22 pm, Tue Jul 31 16:22:37 UTC 2012 #33
Burke is a dead end (no pun intended). He could not have been prosecuted for the crime, assuming he did the initial head injury, since he was 9 years old. He is immune now - if he were innocent, and had information, he could choose to cooperate, but he is not compelled to cooperate. And if he is guilty, why in the world would the BPD think that he would answer any more questions?
"We're not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be." - C.S. Lewis
MY OPINIONS - DO NOT COPY THEM ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET!
-
August 2, 2012, 8:34 pm, Thu Aug 2 20:34:00 UTC 2012 #34
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- In the Federal Witness Protection Program
- Posts
- 1,311
-
August 2, 2012, 10:40 pm, Thu Aug 2 22:40:54 UTC 2012 #35
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 650
-
August 3, 2012, 2:18 am, Fri Aug 3 2:18:22 UTC 2012 #36
Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 674
I don't think we'll ever know if he left something more incriminating out but IMO what he presented in his book would be enough to warrant another meeting with Burke.
Even with all the evidence we have from ST's book and others and now Chief Kolars there is still more we don't know about. I wish he would have just given it all up especially since he knows there will never be a prosecution in this case but I suppose he would have gotten in big trouble if he did that.
Similar Threads
-
Burke Ramsey to be on Dr. Phil
By Moab in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 67Last Post: October 2, 2017, 10:47 am, Mon Oct 2 10:47:28 UTC 2017 -
Lin Wood regarding Burke recent refusal to answer detective's questions
By koldkase in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 17Last Post: October 29, 2010, 4:49 pm, Fri Oct 29 16:49:34 UTC 2010 -
Burke Ramsey graduates from Purdue - May 2010
By Cherokee in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 39Last Post: October 16, 2010, 8:49 pm, Sat Oct 16 20:49:03 UTC 2010 -
Recent Photos of Burke Ramsey
By wombat in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 62Last Post: September 28, 2006, 12:33 pm, Thu Sep 28 12:33:41 UTC 2006 -
Burke Ramsey... the missing link
By Kangatruth in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public ForumReplies: 197Last Post: September 23, 2006, 6:10 pm, Sat Sep 23 18:10:04 UTC 2006