Comments to the FOX Analysis

[1000 Sparks]

EasyWriter... I applaud you.

Now if Fox is reading here, maybe you can work with them.

No joke here. Your interpretation of the truth can't be dismissed.

[Elle_1]

EasyWriter Wrote: These seven options are all that can be taken from the statement. Ergo, it is these seven options that are logically implied to be listed as Plaintiffs. I trust you see the problem. The options
resulting in the “or factor” as opposed to the “and factor” makes
it impossible to name a Plaintiff or Plaintiffs in correspondence
with the statement make by McKinley.

Thank you, Delmar for explaining about the seven options so thoroughly. I do see the problem and understand what you're saying here. I will now move on to part II. I hope this information you are posting reaches Fox News.

[JustChillun]

Has anyone called the Fox legal services dept. regarding this issue? They could be faxed this post.

[Elle_1]

Surely the Fox Attorneys will be aware of Wood's tactics, Delmar? If they miss this, what happens then? Maybe I'll find out in part III. (?). Lin Wood is really chancing his luck here. What an A-S-S!

[Show Me]

This is good....on to part 3.

[Show Me]

Awesome Easywriter! Thank you for taking the time to explain it in simple detail for us simple folk.

I do hope Fox's lawyers check out your post...might save them a lot of time!

[Elle_1]

EasyWriter :
Although some strangulation is possible, there is no mention of “tortured and then bludgeoned.” There is no autopsy conclusion of sequence of events. To falsely claim in a Complaint, an official legal document, that “tortured and then bludgeoned at or near the point of death” is stated or indicated by the autopsy report is either reckless and gross incompetence, or deliberate perjury.

I agree with what you have to say above, and I think Lou Smit should be taken to task for his incompetence.

Absolutely remarkable post, Delmar. Thank you again for taking the time to explain very thoroughly, what a fraudulent lawyer, Lin Wood is, and pointing out all the important facts. I hope Woody gets his "come uppance" through this Fox News lawsuit. I also hope as I stated before that Fox News is made aware of your posts here.

[Moab]

The Fox Threads have been combined

Comments to the Fox threads should be made here.

[EasyWriter]

Originally Posted by Moab

The Fox Threads have been combined

Comments to the Fox threads should be made here.

Thanks for doing the combining. I'm glad there are folks like you around who know a whole lot more about computers that I do. Thanks again. I reallly appreciate it.

[Watching You]

I didn't think it possible, EW, but you have outdone yourself. I agree the FOX lawyers should be reading your posts. Who knows? Maybe they are. One would hope they don't so arrogantly dismiss Internet posters as Lin Wood has made the mistake of doing in the past . I must say I do believe we have the cream of the crop right here at FFJ with EasyWriter and many other posters. EW's posts and Tricia's work could make the difference for FOX. I hope they read them.

[Elle_1]

Originally Posted by JustChillun

Has anyone called the Fox legal services dept. regarding this issue? They could be faxed this post.

Maybe Tricia could send it JC (?). Delmar has sent umpteen e-mails and information to the people concerned with no returns. I'm amazed at his patience to continue analyzing the way he does. He knows we are all grateful for the amount of time he takes to keep us informed.

I for one, would never have understood about the seven options mentioned above, and the craftiness of Lin Wood, to zone in on Burke to make it seem he is the only Ramsey member being pounced on, to suit his way of working.

Does anyone out there know anyone working at Fox News?

[Ginja]

Originally Posted by Show Me

I do hope Fox's lawyers check out your post...might save them a lot of time!

Do we have any email addys for the Fox attorneys? I mean, direct to them, not through Fox.