jameson, ya blooming idiot

Imon,

I have always been a fan of FFJ, before I became a member. I just didn't have the time to post in too many JonBenét sites with family commitments, grandchildren etc., but I left CN2000 last year because of a poster called "Rainsong" who I still think is Jameson herself. In keeping with the present situation here with WY posting to Jams, I wish that I could have posted that same post to Rainsong on CN2, but I would have been thrown off the board.

Rainsong and her mate RobertStJames - maybe this was Susan Stines, the bulldog (?)) - arrived in their full glory and bombarded the posters on CN2000. Hellbent on destruction! I was going through a very trying time with an illness in the family, and I didn't need the extra stress. Plus, I knew I would take my anger out on the wrong people, so I decided to call it quits over there, much to my regret, because it was my very first site, and I had met a lot of nice posters along the way. I did enjoy the research.


My friend Little from Crime and Justice invited me there, and I also came here because I had been in touch with Tricia too, and I have thoroughly enjoyed being here, and reading the intelligent posts.

I know we all joined the forums for a reason. Mine was because of little JonBenét, and it is unfortunate we have all met because of her death, but I think we have all helped each other by discussing this case, and Jameson and Candy have got no right slandering Forums For Justice.

Jams, if you're reading this, you're not the only one who takes notes. I do too! :

I noticed that RobertStJames signed in to CrimeNews 2000 on 18 July, 2003. Just two days after Rainsong. H-e-l-l-o-o-o-o! Is this a COINCIDENCE? I'd say it was! jmo of course!

Now just where did RobertStJames go? His/Her last post was
on 8/31/03.

Definitely planned. jmo of course!


robertstjames 7/18/03 last post - 8/31/03 02


Rainsong 7/16/03 last post - 2/4/04

I quite believe Jams that you've been very busy with this "libelling Burke" business to keep up the pretense of being rainsong, which you have denied, although you did edit her post
and signed it Jameson???

Maybe you might hurry along there and zap one in now that I have reminded you of it. I know all about your other hats coming and going. jmo of course!


ALL OF THE ABOVE IS JUST MY OPINION, OF COURSE, AND I'M NOT A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES

 

Rainsong is posting

at Purgatory right now, I believe.

I am not of the mind that we should be discussing, or dissing, other posters because of their views, EXCEPT for posters who have deliberately attempted and succeeded in making themselves part of the JBR case. And, EXCEPT for those who regularly practice defamation against FFJ and its posters.

Those include Susan Bennett (jameson), who by her own admission is a limited public figure; Mary Suma (mame/maddie) who inserted herself into the case and brought us the fraudulent Nancy Krebs story; Suma's slugs, Morgan (posting other hats including Cheekysodd, Mary99 - who seems to have disappeared from the radar screen but don't count on it, Holly, who I believe posts under different hats, and HoraceMills, who could be any of the above except mame/maddie or could be Susan Stine. It also includes Candy, who has been and continues to defame this forum and its posters.

Rainsong does not post here, obviously, and as yet I haven't seen any posts targeting FFJ or the posters here. However, I think she probably could use a good slap upside the head just for being stupid, so...

So posting about the above posters who have made themselves a part of the JBR case by their own behavior and therefore are a part of its history is fair game. In fact, to totally understand the history, one HAS to consider the impact these posters have had on the case if only the trouble they've caused with their interference. Though some think that influence has been little, consider the fact that Lou Smit and Susan Bennett aka jameson, by her own admission, spent considerable time together, either in person or on the phone. Consider Smit said Bennett has good information. Consider he used her faulty information in his own deliberations about the case, and consider that he went on television several times with this faulty information.

It's not only permissable to discuss this and to challenge the lies of these people, it is necessary to do so, and these threads are not by any stretch of the imagination for the purpose of simply discussing other posters. They are case subjects.

 

Doesn't "Rainsong" sound like a feminine hygiene product? You know, for those times when you're feeling "not so fresh?"

 

Leave it to you, BobC

hahahahahahaha.

 

Oh--coming from the author of the title "I'm a Liar and So Am I?"

 

Little

I've been meaning to tell you I've finished all of your book except for the very last few pages, which I will read soon. For those who haven't read Little's book, I can tell you it is a worthwhile read. It's a chatty book, with Little inserting comments here and there; but mostly it's a wealth of information and a goldmine for JBR researchers. For that alone I would recommend it. I read things in the book that I had never read before - articles and such.

You did a nice job, Little, and it's obvious you put a lot of hard work and research in the book. Also, thanks to ACR for her contributions. Just wanted to acknowledge your work. Thanks.

 

WY

What's the name of the book, and is it published, available as a manuscript, or other? Thanks.

 

Woo Hoo!

When the Hive's a rocking - Don't come knocking!

What did you say, Bob? Vinegar and water time again for the Swamp? Sigh........speaking for the petal fresh folks here, I can only say that it's about time.

Personally - I thought that it was hysterical to see jammy use Fly as a reference for her Burke libel BS thread. Who's next? Gem? Guppy?!

Back to work so I can make those child support payments to John and Patsy.............

RR

 

Re: WY

You can find "Journey Beyond Reason: here. Frank.


http://www.peggylakin.com/

 

Thanks, Elle

I didn't see Frankg's post until now.

I've spoken to Little in a private message about the book. She realizes there are a few little things that probably only I would tell her about, because you all know how I am about grammar and such, but she has done a good job. I can be pretty critical when it comes to writing, and I say that in spite of the rare errors I found that no one else will probably even notice, I was quite impressed. For the record, I can almost always find a couple of errors even in books by best-selling authors. I'm a brat that way. The book is beautifully presented, covers quite a bit of information, the typeset is very nice, and the pictures are nice. It was a book she wrote not to make the New York Times best-selling list, but to have a record out there of the JBR case. All in all, I liked it.

 

WY,

I'm afraid having been a secretary for many years, grammar is also important to me too. Are you also a teacher, like Jayelle's?

With Little choosing to have her book published on the net, I'm unsure of what services were available for her at that time (?). I have always enjoyed reading Little's posts long before she wrote her book, so I knew I would enjoy it.

I feel that "Journey Beyond Reason" is a good reference book,
and I'm pleased to read that you think so too. I was pleased to see Little share the space in her book with the hard work of Delmar England and ACandyRose. Two very important contributors to the Justice for JonBenét. I'm sure Little sent a copy to Tom Bennett (?). I hope he reads it.

I'm sure your comments about the book will be much appreciated by, Little.

 

WY & Elle, your kind words mean the world to me.
WY wrote:

Exactly WY. Thank you.

Elle:

A lot of people contributed to the information in the book, however, without Delmar and ACandyRose there probably wouldn't have been one.

Little

 

Little,

You deserve the kudos!

 

Link to Little's book

Elle, thanks for the link. I'm looking forward to reading it. And Little.. no worries. Unlike Elle and WY, I was a math and science guy.. while everyone else was taking two languages, I was struggling with 1/2.

 

On jameson's Libelling Burke Thread

jameson says:-

And immediately discredited the whole thread in doing so.

Basically, she is telling posters that they need not show the quotes in context by copying the post in its entirety OR by posting the URLs.

I can only imagine she doesn't want the URLs posted because she doesn't want readers to follow them and read alternative interpretations of the facts and evidence.

She speaks of "Fair Use". It is Fair Use to be able to quote another person - but in doing so one should ALWAYS reference the quote and that includes telling the reader where they can find the quote and read it in context.

I have an abundance of quotes by jameson which would have a quite different meaning if I were to post them in isolation.

In academic work, it is essential to reference quotes for this very reason.

 

Thank you Frankg!! I'm glad I didn't have to do any math for this book except page counts.

Little

 

Not a teacher

No, Elles, I'm not a teacher. I think I was a famous writer in a previous life.

I think brains tend to be oriented one way or the other - either toward math and science or toward the language/literature side of things. Like FrankG is a mathematician/scientist type guy, writing and grammar and language are embedded in my genes. I have always loved to read, and though I was an average math/science student (more science than math, thank you very much), I excelled in English.

I'm not perfect, though. I make some of the more common mistakes, especially on the forums where I'm not as careful as I should be sometimes. I'm as picky about my own writing as I am others', but I don't think it's even that I'm picky. I just love to do it. I think I have an English gene.

Little, I am usually not fond of first-person accounts, but I liked your chatty thoughts in your book. It was as if you were carrying on a conversation with yourself, but it wasn't overdone. It added a personal touch to your book that was interesting. I like to see what makes others tick.

Jayelles, it's interesting jameson has so much sympathy for Burke, as in "poor Burke," considering the awful damage she did to another minor child, Ariana Pugh. She had no mercy on her. I haven't seen anyone slap a pornographic picture of a man and a minor boy on the internet and insist it was Burke and John Ramsey.

I don't know of anyone who would do that, nobody I know is that sick or destructive. Nobody here would attempt to hurt Burke that way. But, jameson had no qualms about hurting Ariana that way; in fact, she felt justified hurting her. I don't visit pornographic websites, but if I did, I suspect I could find a picture of a man and a young boy, block out their faces and, using the contrived excuse that I wanted to help that young boy, question if it were JR and Burke Ramsey.

That is exactly what jameson did, and it was despicable. But, that's what jameson Bennett does. She posts controversial pictures on her forum - pictures of a black man being hung by his neck, pornographic pictures of a young girl and a man. She makes insinuations that the girl in the porn looks like Ariana, sends that picture to the police; insinuates anyone who doesn't agree with her is part of the lynch mob.

jameson is not a nice person. She is self-centered, conscienceless, narcississtic to the bone, and black hearted as they come. She'll stab you in the back or the heart, makes no difference to her. There are a handful of posters who have established themselves as deviants and insider wannabees on these forums. jameson leads the pack, but the others aren't far behind.

 

Well Jayelles....

When speaking of swampthings, we ain't talkin' "academics"!

I think you'll find that in any other forum, posters are "academically inclined" in referencing their work, quotes or cites.

However, in order for Jameson and her like to process their lies, deception and misinformation, they NEED to take others' work out of context and twist it to fit their own warped perceptions of their twilight zone existence.

Like terrorists, you simply can't reason with the unreasonable or illogical misgivings of the unfortunates under Jameson's wing.

 

Ginja

Quite. My point is that referencing work is essential for the purposes of integrity and credibility - which is what academics strive for.

 

JammySue provides evidence...

and doesn't know it! At least that's how I read hir "comments" regarding Judith Phillips remarks about Burke. Judith stated:

JammySue's response is:

Judith provides "clues" to how the Ramseys behave. JammySue not only acknowledges Burke's reaction, but gives him kudos for standing up for himself. Without realizing it, JammySue links this Ramsey behavioral attitude of a meeting between Judith and Burke to the 911 call.

Recall John's response to Burke that morning when Burke asked what was going on. John's curt reply is "We aren't talking to you."

Like father, like son.