Re: Adrian and Purr Well... I'm not so sure about that. She did spell "business" as "bussiness" (sic), in that ransom note she wrote with her left hand (see page 406 of the Police Files book). Point being that otherwise "smart" people can goof up big time when the pressure's on. Precisely--more than one episode. This is more than just inappropriate potty-wiping we've got here. It would be astonishing to me if they tried to get this DNA entered into CODIS without first eliminating all possible donors who would have been at Fleet White's party, and all who had been known to be in contact with JBR in the month of December. What I'm thinking is, someone has been purposely left out of the initial cross-checking, and they're crossing their fingers and hoping he won't show up in CODIS. CODIS is a new danger to the integrity of the cover-up, but it temporarily saves face for the parents and gives Lin Wood new ammo to use in his piracy on a ship call Tort, sailing the Seven Seas of the U.S. media. Garrrrrrrr, maties! Hoist the Jolly Roger flag! That is a possibility, but getting a non-degraded sample from a degraded sample, to me sounds a little iffy. Well the staging DID include a thorough wipe-down. They probably tried to bleach it off too. If it's positively confirmed that the DNA material is not blood, then "innocent transfer" would remain a possibility. I personally wouldn't consider that a likelihood, but would accept it as possible. The thing that makes me shy away from "innocent transfer" is the assumption (which may be wrong) that known members of the Ramsey circle of acquaintances have already been checked against this DNA profile. How is JonBenet going to go grab some stranger's DNA into her fingernails, under innocent conditions? Remember, classmates at school wouldn't count, because these would have to already be eliminated. We're talking straight-up running up to some stranger, brushing her finger against his body in some way, and then later scratching her own itchy genitalia with it, presumably preserving the integrity of the transferred sample while the primary sample is degraded? In my mind, the thinness of that level of stretching just breaks the theory for me. And if the primary transfer was to the genitalia itself, then we're back to non-innocent transfer. And then we're back to my "creative writing" conspiracy theory of parental involvement with another party's molestation, and parental staging of the crime scene to cover up that involvement.