so why do you continue to skirt the real issues and spout your nonsense about Nancy Krebs? All of the posters whom you duped over the past three years are still waiting to hear why you targeted Fleet White, and are still targeting Fleet White, while giving John Ramsey a pass. How does Nancy Krebs feel about your posting on a pro-Ramsey forum after what she said John Ramsey did to her in the closet? How can you post at that forum and defend John Ramsey when Nancy clearly said it was he who raped and sodomized her and was the money man for the sex ring? Are you so self-absorbed that you don't see the contradiction in that? Does Nancy know that you are now saying "there isn't enough information for anyone to make a sound judgement in that regard." What do you mean, mame, when you say, "It is important to me that she be understood for what she is, not what she isn't. " What "isn't" she, mame? For that matter, what "is" she? Nobody thinks Krebs is "a crazy woman drooling in the corner." Neither does anyone believe your version that she is "a bright lovely woman with great amounts of dignity." What is obvious from her interviews is that she makes things up. It's called lying. And, what is this? You are now conceding she "could be wrong on some things...because "anyone who has withstood a lifetime of abuse is sure to recall and connect some things wrong along the way." And, of course, the things she "could be wrong on" concern John Ramsey, right, mame? You also continue to ignore the fact that Krebs' claims have been investigated and there is absolutely no evidence anyone ever sexually abused her except for the statutory rape charge against Mackey. But, because that investigation didn't reach the conclusion YOU wanted it to reach, you totally disregard that investigation and continue to say the charges should be investigated. Earth to Suma - grow a brain. You are so transparent, mame. She lied, and you aided and abetted her lies. I think in legal terms it's called fraud by deception or some such terms. You deceived, or at least you tried to deceive, posters on the JBR forums, by conveniently leaving out the incriminating parts about John Ramsey while you focused on damaging White's reputation. You can't justify it, no matter how you try. You can't justify the fact that you are supporting John Ramsey, the man Nancy said violently raped and sodomized her and was part of her ongoing abuse. You can't justify your obsession with Fleet White. You can't justify putting false information out there and defying anyone to question it. But, it doesn't stop you - you just keep peddling your BS. Nancy Krebs, we know you read here. How do you feel about mame's supporting John Ramsey, the man you said raped and sodomized you on an ongoing basis? Are you confused about whether Uncle Johnny is really John Ramsey? You were not confused about it in your interview with the BPD. Did your confusion come after someone pointed out to you that it was Fleet White you were supposed to be accusing? I suppose we could do as Susan Bennett does on her forum. She has invited Fleet White to post on her forum (as if). Perhaps we should put out an invitation to Nancy Krebs to post her thoughts on FFJ for the purpose of telling her story and clearing up any misconceptions. What say you, Nancy? I know Tricia will promise you full protection from flames. She cannot protect you, however, from the truth. Let us hear your story from you instead of through Mary Suma who has done nothing but make people suspicious of you.