Perhaps logic and reasoning defy the rabble, along with standardized (and legislated) morals and ethics. This said, they could easily become offended or contrary if one of us was to post, say, a theory about a killer which was differing in opinion as compared to the bought and paid for press. Of course, some, such as the JamAssOn poster, will be supportive of only those whose posts enhance her opinion. It is small of a person to divest those of opposing opinions of their rights to express said opinions. Further attacks upon the posters themselves would also be proof of a substandard intelligence quotient, reflecting an inability to logically defend one's opinion with fact rather than with shakily constructed postulation.