Hahahaha, Candy strikes again

Good gawd this woman is nuttier than I thought. I am dead serious. I now truly believe she needs help.

 

My message to Candy at Cybersleuths ---->>>> :kmg:


ACandyRose
http://www.acandyrose.com

 

Whoa!

This sounds more severe than being put on NOTICE!

Candy is and has always tried to be A Candy Rose clone. Any good detective could figure that one out and so Steve did..........Fake Candy was flushed away to the sewer of NYC only to emmerge covered in chit. Hi Darnay.

With an "If you can't beat them, join them" loser attitude, Candy lives to share the pain of her unravelment, even to the extent of bringing her friend down with her. Hi Imoff.

So, take one down and pass it around - Hi Rachel - it's going to be menopausal this time. Ain't no amount of midol to control the Beast Within.

RR

 

If not for the ACandyRose website, I doubt I'd have ever known of the many faces of Susan Bennett aka jameson much less that there are forums who allow for differing thoughts. A kind and sincere thank you.

 

The mind-set of disliking the ACandyRose web site, IMO, is not all that different from those who advocated book burnings because they did not accept the content of the books.

ACandyRose simply records the history of the JonBenet case. Clearly she does not differentiate between that which she agrees with and that which she finds offensive. It's all there for the reader, the researcher, and the curious to view. They are free to make their own decisions about the content.

I would guess that those who don't want their flock to get their information from anyone but themselves do, in fact, find ACandyRose a house of horrors. Once people start thinking for themselves, they (the ones who control the flow of information) lose their luster, mystique, and credibility. That's a very scary place for a one-time, self-proclaimed expert to find themself.

 

Little,
In this case, it's more like a person advocating the burning of any book not written by him/herself.

 

I'd love to see the response Candy gets from the Fox attorneys and all...if they bother to answer such a ridiculous accusation.

What does Candy expect them to do? Come to Purg forum and tell ACR to quit posting public documents? :fishslap:

 

Yo

Candy ! If you get ahold of they people from Fox, please tell them to tell Greta hi from me, ok?

Thank you.

 

My gawd, what is wrong with this Candy woman? When did the JBR case become the Candy case?

First she chides everyone because she is the only one who "covers," or gets documents for ALL the cases discussed in the forums; then, she gets irate when ACR puts together a comprehensive compilation of the FOX court documents. She wants bragging rights and to speak to others with derision, and she becomes truly spiteful when someone upstages her, as if that were the motive behind anyone's presenting information.

There is Something Seriously Wrong with Candy. She is a pathetic creature, consumed with herself and with hatred for others.

Groo ought to be very proud of herself. She has thoroughly disgraced CS with her enablement of Candy's abusive and selfish personality and her delusions. But, maybe grooooo can't help it, either. From what I've observed, she seems to be as sick as Candy.

It actually embarrasses me to read Candy's awful ravings. I feel someone should step up to the plate and prevent this sick, sick woman from further public self humiliation.

 

FOX are clearly aware of ACR's Internet archive about the Ramsey case. It's a fantastic resource. Candy OTOH, has a reputation for being terribly unstable. She first hero-worships, then, when she perceives rejection, she turns on her heroes and attempts to destroy their reputations. No-one has a clue what her stance in the Ramsey case is because it changes according to whom she is attacking. She is consumed with hate for so many different people on both sides of the fence and in her attempts to distance herself from all of them she ends up making little or no sense.

Candy also confuses posters and threads on a regular basis. She gets things so muddled up at times that one cannot depend upon her accuracy at any time. She values "being first" more highly than anything else and woe-betide anyone who beats her to it or who brings news to the boards. She's clearly not a team player.

I sincerely hope the Ramseys are aware of her - especially if Burke goes to MSU.

I don't think for one minute that FOX will take her seriously - not if they do a little bit of research first (and they really won't have to look far).

 

Well, I'm quite sure that when Candy saw ACR's website with the FOX court documents, which anyone can access, she immediately wrote to FOX lawyers to inform them that CS has everything they need. Why, CS even has all the court documents for their Ramsey vs FOX lawsuit, just in case FOX needs them, hahahahahaha. Candy now believes FOX will be visiting CS. I'm embarrassed for CS. Candy is inviting ridicule by doing things like this.

You're right, Jayelles, Candy's posts are so convoluted, no one can make sense of what she is saying. I consider myself probably better than average in deciphering what someone is trying to say, but I have to admit she makes my brain hurt trying to understand what she is saying. Even then, it's impossible to know who is doing what to whom, who is the gutter at any given moment and who are the groupies. "They" seems to cover whomever Candy is mad at at the time, "hir" covers anyone Candy hates at the time.

FOX lawyers and the FOX personnel are light years ahead of freaky Candy. All they need is one look at CS and they will know they are dealing with a nutcase of major proportions. Candy is great at deluding herself into believing she is an important player in the JBR case. But, she's not. She's a nobody. And, that is the problem.

 

It's absolutely rabid!!! I'd say Candy is having a reality challenged episode. Incredibly she still thinks public documents are hers. HIR still doesn't get it thru hir gutter groupie mind, it's not about Candy...it's about justice for JonBenet.

I do feel sorry for Candy's coworkers...she's totally postal.

 

What I hope is that she didn't present herself as "Candy" of internet archival fame, and have them somehow presume (ahem) that she is one and the same as A Candy Rose.

I think a note ought to be written to FOX just to clear that little fact up. I don't want anyone to think that ACR is that fruitcake when she isn't archiving.

 

Lord I just went over there. She's becoming a bit scary don't ya think.
This telling on all the posters and forums to Fox Lawyers and Judges is mind boggling to normal adults.
She's a LE groupie.... defending with tooth and nail what she considers her catch and is livid at anyone who manages to draw the attention away from her. She has some possessive/stalking behavior of the kind we seen in criminal cases.

I sure hope she doesn't have the personal info of some of you posters because she is unstable to say the least and has rabid hatred for those of you she considers competition.

 

I'm serious........she's frikin psycho.

 

I couldn't stop myself.......I think I found her tho.......

<img src="http://216.77.188.54/coDataImages/p/Groups/205/205230/folders/158854/1239113images.jpeg" width="135" height="98">

 

This is a valid point. I think FOX should be notified that Candy and ACR are two entirely different characters.