I just love Chuck Green - JonBenet case full of myths, short on facts

heymom · Feb 3, 2007

Paradox said:

What Green commented on has never been publically disclosed. The DA has the power to stop the process before the GJ votes. The intent of the DA does not have to be stated or recorded or reported. To my knowledge, all the DA has to do is not request the GJ's opinion and the process stops.

The scuttlebutt here in Denver is What Green said is true, but it can't be proven because intent cannot be proven. "Not allowed to" is not the same thing as "not necessary".

This is one of the reasons Green is where he is today.

I for one think Hunter knew he would never let the GJ vote when he went to it. He played the same type of game that Lacy played with Karr; they use the time honored process knowing full well it's a dead end because they themselves are leading things to the dead end.

They both should be publically spanked.
Click to expand...

And it certainly appears that Lacy is doing it all over again with the Jason Midyette Grand Jury. She calls a GJ just to get the media off her case, and pretty soon, the parents will be off the hook (actually they've never even been on the hook). More than a spanking is called for - sounds like tar-and-feathering, riding-out-of-town-on-a-rail time to me.

sue · Feb 3, 2007

heymom said:

And it certainly appears that Lacy is doing it all over again with the Jason Midyette Grand Jury. She calls a GJ just to get the media off her case, and pretty soon, the parents will be off the hook (actually they've never even been on the hook). More than a spanking is called for - sounds like tar-and-feathering, riding-out-of-town-on-a-rail time to me.
Click to expand...

YES!
Calling a Grand Jury implies that you are doing something, but since the prosecutors are in the driver's seat as far as evidence presented, they can easily 'steer' it where ever they want it to go.

heymom · Feb 3, 2007

sue said:

YES!
Calling a Grand Jury implies that you are doing something, but since the prosecutors are in the driver's seat as far as evidence presented, they can easily 'steer' it where ever they want it to go.
Click to expand...

Like right off the road to justice and into a muddy ditch.

Show Me · Feb 3, 2007

heymom said:

And it certainly appears that Lacy is doing it all over again with the Jason Midyette Grand Jury. She calls a GJ just to get the media off her case, and pretty soon, the parents will be off the hook (actually they've never even been on the hook). More than a spanking is called for - sounds like tar-and-feathering, riding-out-of-town-on-a-rail time to me.
Click to expand...

Yeah and Lazy will even hire the Midyette's 'friends' or 'investigators' to work in her office to boot!!!

Lazy will not only refuse to take your case to court she'll form a permanent lasting bond with the main suspects.

heymom · Feb 4, 2007

Dug up this great thread from a long time ago...

http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3352&postcount=1

This wonderful post goes through the entire crime, bringing up all the conflicts and impossibilities of an intruder. Great stuff!

tylin · Feb 4, 2007

Heymom,
Thanks for linking to the old post by JL. Funny how the IDI's don't have an explanation for the UNFOLDED 3 page ransom note. :rs:
There is just no way a stranger could have written the note and not left fingerprints, a smudge or something on the War and Peace of ransom notes.
Has it ever been if the 3 page ransom note had any stains on it? Any creases? Anything?

heymom · Feb 4, 2007

tylin said:

Heymom,
Thanks for linking to the old post by JL. Funny how the IDI's don't have an explanation for the UNFOLDED 3 page ransom note. :rs:
There is just no way a stranger could have written the note and not left fingerprints, a smudge or something on the War and Peace of ransom notes.
Has it ever been if the 3 page ransom note had any stains on it? Any creases? Anything?
Click to expand...

I have never seen a mention of any crease, stain, print, or anything else. It is as if the "intruder" removed it from a page protector and laid it out on the staircase just as though it were staged. Hmmmmm....that alone, and no other evidence, should say to ANY investigator - "wha' happened here?" Then you look at the comparison to Patsy's handwriting, well, there's your answer. The only way she stayed out of jail is with the liars, er, lawyers working full-time. And she was lucky to have done this in Boulder, or even with the lawyers, her butt would have been in jail. Too bad for "that child."

tylin · Feb 4, 2007

heymom said:

I have never seen a mention of any crease, stain, print, or anything else. It is as if the "intruder" removed it from a page protector and laid it out on the staircase just as though it were staged. Hmmmmm....that alone, and no other evidence, should say to ANY investigator - "wha' happened here?" Then you look at the comparison to Patsy's handwriting, well, there's your answer. The only way she stayed out of jail is with the liars, er, lawyers working full-time. And she was lucky to have done this in Boulder, or even with the lawyers, her butt would have been in jail. Too bad for "that child."
Click to expand...

Absolutely. Seems like such a no brainer doesn't it? A little common sense could have taken this case a longgggggg way, imo.

Log in

I just love Chuck Green - JonBenet case full of myths, short on facts

heymom Member

sue Member

heymom Member

Show Me FFJ Senior Member

heymom Member

tylin Banned

heymom Member

tylin Banned

Log in

I just love Chuck Green - JonBenet case full of myths, short on facts

heymom Member

sue Member

heymom Member

Show Me FFJ Senior Member

heymom Member

tylin Banned

heymom Member

tylin Banned

Useful Searches