Investigating the mamebot mind

Here ya go Ilene-Sue

CIVIL CODE
SECTION 43-53

43.93. (a) For the purposes of this section the following
definitions are applicable:
(1) "Psychotherapy" means the professional treatment, assessment, or counseling of a mental or emotional illness, symptom, or condition.
(2) "Psychotherapist" means a physician and surgeon specializing in the practice of psychiatry, a psychologist, a psychological assistant, a marriage and family therapist, a registered marriage and family therapist intern or trainee, an educational psychologist, an associate clinical social worker, or a licensed clinical social worker.
(3) "Sexual contact" means the touching of an intimate part of
another person. "Intimate part" and "touching" have the same
meanings as defined in subdivisions (f) and (d), respectively, of
Section 243.4 of the Penal Code. For the purposes of this section,
sexual contact includes sexual intercourse, sodomy, and oral
copulation.
(4) "Therapeutic relationship" exists during the time the patient
or client is rendered professional service by the therapist.
(5) "Therapeutic deception" means a representation by a
psychotherapist that sexual contact with the psychotherapist is
consistent with or part of the patient's or former patient's
treatment.
(b) A cause of action against a psychotherapist for sexual contact exists for a patient or former patient for injury caused by sexual contact with the psychotherapist, if the sexual contact occurred under any of the following conditions:
(1) During the period the patient was receiving psychotherapy from the psychotherapist.
(2) Within two years following termination of therapy.
(3) By means of therapeutic deception.
(c) The patient or former patient may recover damages from a
psychotherapist who is found liable for sexual contact. It is not a
defense to the action that sexual contact with a patient occurred
outside a therapy or treatment session or that it occurred off the
premises regularly used by the psychotherapist for therapy or
treatment sessions. No cause of action shall exist between spouses within a marriage.
(d) In an action for sexual contact, evidence of the plaintiff's
sexual history is not subject to discovery and is not admissible as
evidence except in either of the following situations:
(1) The plaintiff claims damage to sexual functioning.
(2) The defendant requests a hearing prior to conducting discovery and makes an offer of proof of the relevancy of the history, and the court finds that the history is relevant and the probative value of the history outweighs its prejudicial effect.
The court shall allow the discovery or introduction as evidence
only of specific information or examples of the plaintiff's conduct
that are determined by the court to be relevant. The court's order
shall detail the information or conduct that is subject to discovery.

 

You guys are the best

Ilene-Sue, mamebot denies ever soliciting help for Nancy Krebs, but she's a damn liar, because I was on JW when it all came down, and she most certainly did cry poverty for Nancy at the time. I remember many people sent money and clothing and whatever else. I did not. I am not into sending money to people I don't know unless someone very trustworthy vouches for that person, and it's for a cause I believe in - like the Steve Thomas attorney fund. I did not know mamesuma other than on the forum, and I wasn't all the impressed with what I saw there. At any rate, I sure wasn't sending her or her protege money on mame's word.

 

Gee, I wonder if she got any size 7 Reeboks. I need some new shoes....