Is Tracey Author of "Patricia Letters"?

My 'she' referred to Misty of course.

 

Yeah, and in true Ramsey fashion, they're as snakey as can be. :snake:

 

On the JBR forums where she posts, Sweet Sue just can't stop wearing hats form her large collection. When reading the Topix JBR board today and saw a poster named "questions" had written the last reply, I just KNEW it was Jameson even before I opened the thread and saw 'Hickory, NC' show up as the location.
When Jammy Sue realized she had made a mistake by forgetting to use her anonymous 'AOL' instead of her Hickory, NC location, she quickly added another post, this time using her Jameson hat (# 27):

Sure, Sue.

Stupid deception games are an integral part of Susan Bennett's mindset - a character trait she shares with the Patricia Letter writer. For what stands out in the letters is mostly their sheer stupidity.
The LW's attempt at deception are so ridiculoulsy blunt and obvious that they sometimes border on the comical.
All that constant whining of the LW (impersonating Patsy) that she would "put her family in harm's way" if she revealed her contacts with the mysterious man who might be the killer - anyone with half a brain can see that these letters are a lousily concocted hoax. Jameson can't do any better, since her decepton skills are not refined at all.

In June 2000, Misty and Delmar England published their analysis of the Patricia letters, coming to the conclusion that Jameson was the writer.

Jammy Sue is furious of course and decides to strike back by using another hoax. Posting under the hat "Foster", she suggests that there exists no Delmar England. Priceless.

Misty's comment:

Susan's bogus 'Foster' hat post was another blunt deception attempt with the purpose of discrediting the analyzers of the letters.

Interesting how Jameson, when getting caught in her lies, tries to downplay it all by giving them the euphemism "semantics games".

The LW played "semantics games" too - and thoroughly enjoyed them, just as Susan relishes hers.

On June 12, 2000, Jameson posted:

"A poster playing games". Right on, Sue! Now who comes to mind here?

 

From 'Patricia' to 'Nancy'

I just found this at Topix:

Capricorn's reply:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/jonbenet-ramsey/T0SM6S2IFAJDHE396

I haven't read it at the swamp yet - but is seems Sweet Sue is at it again - posting as "Nancy" who claims to have written the ransom note.

This sounds soo like "Patricia" who in some letters also made her corespondents believe she might be Patsy covering up for the killer or was the killer herself.

April, 24th, 1999 letter to Cheesy:

Those sick deception games play a huge role in Jammy Sue's life - she can't do without them. Therefore her habitual pattern of behavior will emerge over and over again.

 

Why aren't there more people besides this board who see this as the work of a seriously disturbed person? To pretend to have participated in the coverup of the murder of a 6-year-old girl in order to deflect guilt away from parents who are clearly guilty....it is sick on many levels.

 

Yes, Susan Bennett is a very disturbed individual in several ways.

As for the Patricia letters, they are a mixture of blunt Ramsey innocence promo and the LW getting carried away in her own fantasies about the killer.

 

Imo Karr can be also ruled out as the author of the Patricia letters because Gsquared received a letter from one of Patrica's email addresses while Karr was in prison in August 2006.

It said:

So, after seven years had passed since the last email sent by 'Patricia', the LW chose to 'speak' again. Eery.
A bit like Rumpelstilzkin smirking over the others' inability to discover his name ...

 

I think it can be assumed that the Patricia letter writer is someone among us who enjoys these little games--as we've so often seen among those who support the Ramseys. That a murdered child is at the heart of it all seems to mean nothing to these game players.