The NK interview tapes

Re: Hey BobC

If John "Ramsey Meat Puppet" Douglas said, it, I'm going to have to reevaluate my own assessment.

Perhaps satanists exist after all?

 

<I>I think she just gets off on lying and the attention she gets from it.</I>

I'm with you BobC, and we know people like her exist...we've watched lots of them on the forums for years. JMCPO also

 

Voyager, BobC, Tricia

Voyager,

It wouldn't do any good to email those jerks. LOL. They need cases to fit their preconcieved notions....truth doesn't fit their agendae.

BobC,

you could be right, but so could I. Neither of us has spent the years it would take with NK to be able to make that determination. But if you are right, why do YOU think Fleet White went after the newspapers instead of NK in his lawsuit?

Tricia, will the rest of the interview be put up soon?

 

Re: Maggie and JR.....

Voyager, if you are talking about Scott Peterson's Spin Team (SPST) they already know this. As for those who have worked so hard to perpetuate this scenario in other cases - they are so closed minded they wouldn't bother to read it anyway. IMH&CPO.

 

Satanists

Adrian Monk sez:
Perhaps satanists exist after all?

Oh, I'm positive that satanists exist. Satanism is essentially a black sheep branch of Christianity -- that is to say, in order to believe in Satan, one must have a fundemental belief in Christian theology. (This statement intends no disrespect for Christianity, as I hope you all know.)

What I doubt exists is the wide-spread Satanic cult that is allegedly responsible for wide-spread human sacrifice, yet are so crafty and clever in their conspiracy to cover it up that no evidence exists at all.

Ayeka

 

I don't think Krebs is

schizophrenic, either. For one thing, her therapist did not seem to be treating her for schizophrenia. That is made blatantly clear in the fact that Mary Bienkowski encouraged Nancy's behavior by supporting her in her trip to Boulder and thereafter. As far as I know, Bienkowski doesn't have the credentials to be dealing with a full-fledged schizoid in the first place.

In the second place, no doctor of psychology or psychiatry would ever support a patient's paranoia and delusions by going along with a stunt like NK pulled. Bienkowski was a therapist - a label placed on far too many these days who really don't have the proper credentials. Maybe a more honest label would be "counselor," but, then, we have no-name, inferior writers with no credentials at all claiming they are journalists, too, so go figure.

As far as FW is concerned, what we he sue Nancy for, her good looks? Can one even sue an incompetent? She may be a flake, but sociopath is more likely than schizophrenic. There are tons of sociopaths running around the country. You can find them on the forums if you pay attention. NK probably should see a qualified shrink and stop playing footsie with someone who doesn't know her pathos.

 

Re: Satanists

I have doubts of a similar flavor.

I think it may be possible for some small groups of abusers to use satanic imagery (and other imagery) as a part of pedophilic and pornographic activities, but for a widespread network of such people to exist would allow too much risk of their exposure, the real kind of exposure--the one that produces evidence. It also wouldn't be too bright for those in the official Satanic religions to partake in such abusive activities.

Would it be possible for "Uncle Johnny" Ramsey to don a KKK hood and/or a headdress of horns, or a High Priest's robe with satanic sigils on it, while garroting and abusing JonBenet? I'm sure it's theoretically possible, and adult porn of a similar nature is commonly produced and spread throughout the Internet. But adhering to theories with no consistent patterns of the evidence of the case would be more the province of imbeciles like Lou Smit and John Douglas, not real sleuths.

 

Re: Satanists

Ayeka, I don't think most of us doubt that satanists exist but they have nothing to do with the Ramsey and the Peterson case. It's all just more spin to create "reasonable doubt." It isn't working. IMH&CPO.

 

JR

Believe you me, I agree. I just wanted to point out there's a difference between a satanist and an alleged human-sacrificing satanic cult.

Ayeka

 

That's right, Ayeka. I am most of the way through the book "Sexual Personae" which traces all the Earth Cults and Earth Goddess cults back to their roots in earliest recorded history. Satan, in early, early Christianity had breasts and was the demonization of pagan Earth Goddesses. Paganism is seeing a resurgeance these days, and it really hasn't a thing to do with what modern Christians think of as Satan.

Satan, as most Westerners think of him today, is a wholly Christian concoction whose roots have long since been almost completely forgotten. So Paganism is only distantly related to today's "Satan."

I'll shut up now.

 

Just wanted to pop in to say Thank You to Watching You for transcribing Nancy's words that some other people leave out.