Whackadoodle Evening2 - THREAD #2

Good. Lord. That thread you linked to, Jayelles, appears to me to name McReynold's having an interest in "gay" pornography "a secret", which jams now is OUTING. And what is the SOURCE for this SECRET? I don't see one named...just JAMS.

Sorry, I'm not using jams' GOSSIP as a source for anything but RST GOSSIP.

I'm still reading, but that is one doozer of a thread, so maybe I'll find a "source" other than the sudden left turn of the RST NOW ATTACKING MCREYNOLDS...again.

I thought mBm thought Karr was in on it with JAR or his friends? Last time I looked? So how did this certainty that McReynolds is THE PERP change without so much as a "clearing" by jams? Maybe I'm getting mBm mixed up with the rest of the RST there--so many wingnutz, so little time.... But in this thread Don Bradley, who loathes to name ANYONE a suspect other than mentally ill Oliva as "church mouse", is going with the McReynolds flow.

Oh wait, Karr showed up at the swamp as their STAR PERVERT after this, didn't he?

Well, I'm sure whackadoodles was in heaven. Seems she'd turned the worm, and they were all jumping on the "McReynolds did it" band wagon. Truly pathetic. AGAIN, his DNA did NOT match, but oh well, he had that FOREIGN FACTION with him, so no prob....

Where are they on this now? E2 left in a huff after jams said don't turn every thread into McReynold's did it. Karr came and went last year. Now E2 is back. Mame is back, too. What's the code six count there now?

What a bunch of total idiots.

 

Who knew E2 had published hundreds of articles and is known by her real name throughout the world? Heh. I sure didn't. She posted this at CL recently.

"I forgot to add, Jayelles. I TOO have published hundreds of articles all of which used the same name, my REAL name. I'm known BY that name throughout the world and had NO reason whatsoever to use another."


:beammeup:

 

Well, the suspense is nail-biting.

Does she mean she published hundreds of articles...online? If that's the standard of "publishing" she means, we've all published tens of thousands of "articles" online.

Or does she mean academic articles? Hm. Now what oh what is her area of specialty? Conspiracy theories? Or just libeling the McReynolds endlessly?

 

She certainly doesn't seem to want "that name" linked to her screen name.

 

Strange way to word this IMO. If someone publishes then they are a publisher. If someone has an article published that could mean a letter to the editor. Hundreds of articles? Articles? In newsprint? In magazines? In PTA newsletters?

Really strange.

Little

 

Hmmm. Yes, she posted that in response to a discussion about Janet McReynolds using pen names - something which I don't consider particulalry unusual but which she thinks is suspicious. I stated that like many other professional females, I have used my maiden name. I have colleagues who are known by their maiden name for professional purposes but are Mrs Hubby-Name for everything else. Writers often use different pen names for different genres of writing and have been doing so for centuries.

If E2 is writing articles under her own name then it's my guess that she is writing about something of which she has specialist knowledge or personal experience and which her name would be associated with in that respect. In such cases, a writer would tend to use his/her own name to add credence to the article.

Having seen the imaginative stuff she conjures up with regard to the Ramsey case, she clearly has a flair for fiction, but having had an insight into her talent for fabricating "facts", I wouldn't be interested in anything she had to say about a factual event.

Fiction writers often use pen names.

 

GO GIANTS!!!

Screw E2.

 

:rs:

Hilarious! :abnormal:

 

It was a great game! Yea GIANTS!!! :cheering:

 

I'm sorry folks but I have to do this....

SHANKER!

:floor:

(I learned a new word today )

 

It's a good one - thanks to Thor. Has a certain "je ne ce quoi". Don't you think?

 

So...have we learned yet what Miss WORLD-FAMOUS's nom de plume is yet?

Oh, wait, she doesn't use a nom de plume, but her REAL name in her WORLD-FAMOUS writings. Brilliant crime solver that she is, I would love to read her articles/work. Maybe she should at least let the BDA in on it. Then they might go ahead and arrest Janet McReynolds for her!

But I have to ask...if she's a WORLD-FAMOUS author, would that make her a PUBLIC FIGURE?

 

I think anyone could build a case against anyone using E2's logic. There are coincidence all over the place.

Some years ago I posted about how I'd encountered "Jameson" in umpteen different palces over the space of a weekend. It was on a whiskey bottle, a boat was called "Jameson", there was a pub called The Jameson Inn or something lke that.... Using E2's logic, I could see these as "clues" rather than rather irritating (nauseating?) coincidences.

 

I will have to give credit here. Jams went through the tedious job of watching the Lighthouse videos where he claims to NAME THE KILLER and summarizing them. Yes, it's the same old wacko Lighthouse using video on youtube to document his WILD AND CRAZY theory.

So to your point, Jayelles, Lighthouse has taken a long line of "connections" he gleans out of the ransom note, with dubious interpretations twisted into AHA! claims, and runs that out for hours into a case that the old prankster group PHONE LOSERS OF AMERICA murdered JonBenet! You remember them: they spammed the old Boulder News Forum to its demise, eventually, and harassed innumerable posters, creating a lot of the negative atmosphere still around today, I believe. It's amazing how people who dedicate themselves to such things create so much chaos.

But back to Lighthouse: I remember when Lighthouse was trying to get posters at forums to MEET with him in Boulder under real cloak and dagger conditions. We all vigorously encouraged some who were considering it NOT TO GO THERE. As his videos and convoluted theory certainly imply, Lighthouse is a few watts short of a beacon....

Yes, Lighthouse claims to have contacted Boulder LE repreatedly with his brilliant case solving. Anyone who has observed the number and dedication of the many case wingnutz we've seen through the years just on the JBR forums has to sympathize with LE on this point. And these are the "leads" the RST wingnutz demonize the BPD over, no less: THEY DIDN'T FOLLOW MY INFORMATION AND ARREST XYZ! THEY'RE SO INCOMPETENT! THEY NEVER INVESTIGATED ANYONE BUT THE RAMSEYS!

And how many of these wingnutz do you think are on Smit's 50+ page list of suspects? It'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

 

Thankfully, the Phone Losers were well before my time but I've heard the name.

I genuinely think these people should be writing fiction - think how convoluted the Da Vinci code is - they'd probably write really good stories with their fertile imaginations and all.