Page 5 of 25 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 297
  1. #49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    The lawsuit says :-

    that plaintiff's reputation has been permanently damaged

    that he has suffered stress, emotional distress, mental pain and suffering and adverse physical consequences

    that he has suffered public hatred, contempt and ridicule

    that he has suffered a permanent impairment to his ability to obtain or maintain gainful employment


    I thought he was a bank manager or something? Surely he hasn't lost his job because of some whacko's nonsensical posts on the Internet?
    You know ... this whole thing is so STUPID.

    How many people read Undertheradar's posts at WS about Westmoreland? Maybe a few hundred?

    And how many of those people took it seriously? Zero.

    How in the world could that have affected Westmoreland's ability to obtain or maintain gainful employment?

    Okay, add in the people who read at Topix ... that STILL doesn't amount to permanent damage to Westmoreland's reputation. No one has taken Undertheradar's posts seriously. He's obviously a fruitcake.

    How very coincidental that Westmoreland's attorney just happens to be Lin Wood. There's a lot more to this than meets the eye.

  2. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    It was his actual initials Elle. He was a lawyer and I remember his surname was Cunningham because we had a discussion about his Scottish roots.
    Thanks Jay. I have also heard some more information from another friend. I may have been away when all of this was going on (?). I don't have time to visit the other JonBenét boards much. However, I enjoy reading about what's happening on all of these other boards.

    I was pleased to read Why_Nut's post, stating it was just an investigation of a poster, and that Tricia is not being sued.
    elle: The RST can't handle the truth!
    Just my opinion.

  3. #51

    Default

    Hmmm, undrtheradar had posted that he had sent his suspicions and theory to the DA and to the police department.

    To answer another posters question, Mjenn was the great poster who had met Pachaly and filled us in.

    This undrtheradar was so positive of Westmoreland's guilt, and desperate to post about it and tell the world, I have no doubt at all that he contacted Jameson. Of course, Woody wouldn't supeona Jammy Sue or the Double B, as he has WS and Topix, too much other info would come out. I KNOW for a fact I read his outrageous claims in the Open Forum at BB. Westmoreland was JR's Financial Advisor to answer another posters question.

  4. #52
    RiverRat's Avatar
    RiverRat is offline FFJ Sr. Member Extraordinaire (Pictured at Left is Patsy Ramsey)
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NoneYa Beessness
    Posts
    7,824

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    You know ... this whole thing is so STUPID.

    How many people read Undertheradar's posts at WS about Westmoreland? Maybe a few hundred?

    And how many of those people took it seriously? Zero.

    How in the world could that have affected Westmoreland's ability to obtain or maintain gainful employment?

    Okay, add in the people who read at Topix ... that STILL doesn't amount to permanent damage to Westmoreland's reputation. No one has taken Undertheradar's posts seriously. He's obviously a fruitcake.

    How very coincidental that Westmoreland's attorney just happens to be Lin Wood. There's a lot more to this than meets the eye.
    I know! In fact, this one may be easier to disprove that John Mark Karr was!

    And if Suma does decide to sue...... get it ready.
    "Don't play dumb with me, RR! You're no good at it." The Punisher

    "Although no one is anticipating a prompt resolution to this long and much-detoured case, perhaps - just perhaps - might we see one of those moments “when a chance arrow of history scores a perfect bullseye on a deserving target”? Steve Thomas 2009

    "Justice hasn't had a chance so far. Anyone who doesn't have this as their prime goal, we'll have a falling out with." Fleet White - Time Magazine

    "What happens is that evil comes in," Fleet says. "If you don't have truth, all you have are lies, then what comes in is evil. And evil just does its thing. In the Ramsey case, it just did its thing, and it's eaten up so many people."

  5. #53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tricia
    I am not suppose to comment but honest to God, Suma is so STUPID I had to say something.

    I, Tricia Griffith am NOT BEING SUED. Read the complaint.

    Waiting for Suma's huge and scary legal team to contact me.
    They can't read or comprehend. But they'd better get a clue really fast and stop crowing because what they are cheering is their own possible demise.

    What the suit is about is Westmoreland/Wood wanting the real name of the poster "Undertheradar." By naming WS and Topix, they hope to use discovery to find Undertheradar's name in order to take legal action against that person.

    The suit is about protecting internet identity. Some of Susan Bennett's foul-mouthed and libelous posters had better hope Westmoreland isn't successful.

  6. #54

    Default

    Hang on hang on..."Lies are prosecutable"...?

    Excuse me? I know I'm just not as smart as little miss gossip-monger, but...could someone tell me the law behind this "PROSECUTABLE" CRIME OF LYING?

    I mean...I can see that some lies, like if you lie to LE...those are prosecutable. But...I'm just in a fog here.

    And if lies are "prosecutable," I hope mame is packing her bags as I type. I don't know of ANYONE on the internet who has told more lies than she has. I have a post she wrote at the swamp JUST DAYS AGO, when she says the Whites HAVE A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE FOR YEARS. She said they are a "team." Yep, she posted it, and she didn't mince words. She also gave NO SOURCE for that little LIELIELIELIELIE.

    Since no less than SCORES of people have told mame PUBLICLY for YEARS and YEARS that Nancy Krebs is NOT a reliable source, since mame herself not only has had access to the very EVIDENCE of that in the form of the LE transcripts of Krebs' interviews with them, but SHE GOT THEM FIRST AND POSTED THEM ONLINE, and since mame KNOWS that Krebs' story was NOT BASED IN REALITY, and I have the 500 or so posts from Purgatory where she was in on a very long and detailed discussion OF THIS VERY FACT...I'd say mame is simply LYING when she makes such irresponsible statements about the Whites. Unless mame is going to plead she's NOT COMPETENT in trial herself. Well, she'd win that hands down....

    Oh, please, someone who actually knows these "laws making lying a criminally prosecutable offense" enlighten us. We needed this info FOR YEARS. All along, we thought that White was the one who needed to bring a suit. You mean, all we had to do was REPORT THE CRIME OF LYING?

    Wow. Now that's information that impresses me.... Who do we call?

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  7. #55

    Default

    You know the terms of what awful things those postings did to this Westmoreland are laughable. Did the man lose his job? Is he now destitute? On psychotropic drugs prescribed after the events? Seeing a psychiatrist now for the awful devastation of it all...?

    Hm. Sounds like something a PI could look into. Bedridden? Or on the golf course? Laughing in a tux? Or walking with a cane around the "rest haven"?

    I mean, here I thought the man was a wealthy, successful banker....

    NOW I think he's a BROKEN, SHELL of a man....

    And did underthewhatsit cause me to have that impression?

    NO! LIN WOOD'S COMPLAINT FILED ON HIS BEHALF DID!

    hahaha Maybe Westmoreland should sue WOOD!

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  8. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cherokee
    You know ... this whole thing is so STUPID.

    How many people read Undertheradar's posts at WS about Westmoreland? Maybe a few hundred?

    And how many of those people took it seriously? Zero.

    How in the world could that have affected Westmoreland's ability to obtain or maintain gainful employment?

    Okay, add in the people who read at Topix ... that STILL doesn't amount to permanent damage to Westmoreland's reputation. No one has taken Undertheradar's posts seriously. He's obviously a fruitcake.
    I wouldn't be surprised if the media ran with this. Undertheradar 's posts may end up getting far more publicity than they would have done otherwise.

    How very coincidental that Westmoreland's attorney just happens to be Lin Wood. There's a lot more to this than meets the eye.
    Well, one wonders if they actually suspect that UndertheRadar is someone they know. I've been trying to put myself in Rod Westmoreland's position.

    If some nutso stranger was posting garbage about me that people were taking seriously, then I'd be naturally concerned about shutting them up and clearing my name. However, if that person was posting garbage about me that no-one was taking seriously, I don't think I'd lose much sleep over it. IN fact, I'd take a great deal of comfort from the fact that people weren't taking the accusations seriously. Take for example the poster FreeFalling and her lunatic accusations about me bugging her phone and defrauding her credit card etc. Although they are irritating, I don't think I would take actions that would publicise the posts to a much greater extent than they already had been. HOWeVER.... if I suspected that the person posting them was someone known to me....someone that I really wanted to have caught and exposed... that might be a different matter.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  9. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Candyland
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shannon_2
    Hmmm, undrtheradar had posted that he had sent his suspicions and theory to the DA and to the police department.

    To answer another posters question, Mjenn was the great poster who had met Pachaly and filled us in.

    This undrtheradar was so positive of Westmoreland's guilt, and desperate to post about it and tell the world, I have no doubt at all that he contacted Jameson. Of course, Woody wouldn't supeona Jammy Sue or the Double B, as he has WS and Topix, too much other info would come out. I KNOW for a fact I read his outrageous claims in the Open Forum at BB. Westmoreland was JR's Financial Advisor to answer another posters question.
    If I remember correctly, jameson was one of the few posters who responded to Undertheradar's posts at Topix. I must see if any of those posts are cached in my computer. I have the history set high.
    This is my opinion and it may not be copied in whole or in part without my written permission

  10. #58

    Default

    Not to mention...how many people NOW are going to know about what only a FEW posters knew about before Wood got into it?



    We are not that gullible. This isn't about Westmoreland's rep nor about a few stupid posts by some unknown wingnut. Wood wanted to sue "some forums," and he got a shill for the Rams to help him, I'd bet.

    Will he include Dephi? Or is that outfit too big, with their own lawyers who know this stuff chapter and verse in their sleep?

    Well, if it becomes an issue of suing forums for what posters say on them, then the issue of freedom of speech will suffer a blow only equal to that Hitler would advocate. In the end, it's always about money, as poor people who can't afford lawyers will always lose against rich people who can.

    So it will be interesting. Sooner or later, the ACLU will have to get involved, otherwise, rich people will not only get away with murder, but they'll be the only ones talking about it.

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  11. #59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    I wouldn't be surprised if the media ran with this. Undertheradar 's posts may end up getting far more publicity than they would have done otherwise.
    Oh! Now there's an idea! Poor Westmoreland's reputation should be CLEARED OF THESE AWFUL, AWFUL LIES!

    Yeah, people should KNOW that he's NOT A BABY RAPER AND CHILD KILLER! People should KNOW that he's NOT A SUSPECT! EVERYONE should know that this innocent man is now SUFFERING A TERRIBLE FATE because of all these lies!


    Should we start emailing the media? Of course, Wood would be ALL FOR that, right? He LOVES the media! He'll get to go on LKL again! He can call and threaten more people who oppose him on TV!

    Guttah groupies? Crack ho's? What's the plan?

    "University of Colorado Law Professor Paul Campos declared the letter a 'reckless exoneration.' He went on to state, 'Everyone knows that relative immunity from criminal conviction is something money can buy.
    Apparently another thing it can buy is an apology for even being suspected of a crime you probably already would have been convicted of committing if you happened to be poor.'"
    FF: WRKJB?

    ~~~~~~~
    Bloomies underwear model:
    3 Dimensional

    ~~~~~~
    My opinions, nothing more.

  12. #60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    I wouldn't be surprised if the media ran with this. Undertheradar 's posts may end up getting far more publicity than they would have done otherwise.
    Isn't THAT the truth! A few hundred people MIGHT have read Undertheradar's posts, and even fewer would have remembered them. No one believed them. Now that Lin Wood has filed the suit on Westmoreland's behalf, and it's posted on TheSmokingGun, and released to the AP wire ... hundreds of thousands of people will read about it and eventually millions will know about it as it drags on. By bringing the suit, Westmoreland has created an audience Undertheradar could never have hoped to reach!


    Well, one wonders if they actually suspect that UndertheRadar is someone they know. I've been trying to put myself in Rod Westmoreland's position.

    If some nutso stranger was posting garbage about me that people were taking seriously, then I'd be naturally concerned about shutting them up and clearing my name. However, if that person was posting garbage about me that no-one was taking seriously, I don't think I'd lose much sleep over it. IN fact, I'd take a great deal of comfort from the fact that people weren't taking the accusations seriously. Take for example the poster FreeFalling and her lunatic accusations about me bugging her phone and defrauding her credit card etc. Although they are irritating, I don't think I would take actions that would publicise the posts to a much greater extent than they already had been. HOWeVER.... if I suspected that the person posting them was someone known to me....someone that I really wanted to have caught and exposed... that might be a different matter.
    Obviously, Undertheradar is a nutcase. Obviously, his/her mad rantings on the internet don't amount to a hill of beans. The lawsuit isn't about "damage" to Westmoreland's person or reputation. So what is it about?

    Is it some kind of payback from Lin Wood and the RST?

    Is Westmoreland trying to get the name of a person who is stalking him in real life?

    Is Lin Wood using Westmoreland to garner fame, attention and money since the Ramsey cash cow dried up?

    Does the high and mighty Westmoreland read at WS and Topix to know that Undertheradar was posting about him, or did someone alert Lin Wood who then sold Westmoreland on the idea of a lawsuit?

    Is it all of the above?

    This whole thing is so laughable and ludicrous.

    Yes, Westmoreland is now a pathetic shell of a man haunting the darkened alleyways of destitution because of the ridiculous and insignificant rants of an internet looney. Boy, Lin Wood must be hard up for work if this is the best lawsuit he can dredge up.



Similar Threads

  1. Did John find JonBenet's body at 11 a.m. and not 1 p.m.?
    By Learnin in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: August 30, 2012, 3:15 pm, Thu Aug 30 15:15:54 UTC 2012
  2. To The Poster Who Questioned WS!
    By shannon1233 in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: October 9, 2006, 10:32 pm, Mon Oct 9 22:32:47 UTC 2006
  3. Why hasn't Lin Wood Sued the real Pornographers?
    By Scarpetta in forum Justice for JonBenet Discussion - Public Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: November 14, 2003, 8:49 pm, Fri Nov 14 20:49:37 UTC 2003

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •